From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: phasta@kernel.org
Cc: schalla@marvell.com, vattunuru@marvell.com,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Shijith Thotton" <sthotton@marvell.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Satha Rao" <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vdpa/octeon_ep: Control PCI dev enabling manually
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 07:28:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515072724-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6e5e4c0f32f8ecb3be71181042082d2d8a9533b.camel@mailbox.org>
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:14:22AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-08 at 10:51 +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > PCI region request functions such as pci_request_region() currently
> > have
> > the problem of becoming sometimes managed functions, if
> > pcim_enable_device() instead of pci_enable_device() was called. The
> > PCI
> > subsystem wants to remove this deprecated behavior from its
> > interfaces.
> >
> > octeopn_ep enables its device with pcim_enable_device() (for VF. PF
> > uses
> > manual management), but does so only to get automatic disablement.
> > The
> > driver wants to manage its PCI resources for VF manually, without
> > devres.
> >
> > The easiest way not to use automatic resource management at all is by
> > also handling device enable- and disablement manually.
> >
> > Replace pcim_enable_device() with pci_enable_device(). Add the
> > necessary
> > calls to pci_disable_device().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
>
> Hi again,
>
> this is the last of 12 drivers blocking me from removing a few hundred
> lines of broken code from PCI. Would be great if it could be sent to
> Linus next merge window.
>
> Can someone take this patch in?
>
> Thx
> P.
I intend to, working on packing things up for -next as we speak.
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - s/AF/PF
> > - Add Vamsi's AB
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Only call pci_disable_device() for the PF version. For AF it
> > would
> > cause a WARN_ON because pcim_enable_device()'s callback will also
> > try to disable.
> > ---
> > drivers/vdpa/octeon_ep/octep_vdpa_main.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/octeon_ep/octep_vdpa_main.c
> > b/drivers/vdpa/octeon_ep/octep_vdpa_main.c
> > index f3d4dda4e04c..9b49efd24391 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/octeon_ep/octep_vdpa_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/octeon_ep/octep_vdpa_main.c
> > @@ -454,6 +454,9 @@ static void octep_vdpa_remove_pf(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev)
> > octep_iounmap_region(pdev, octpf->base,
> > OCTEP_HW_MBOX_BAR);
> >
> > octep_vdpa_pf_bar_expand(octpf);
> > +
> > + /* The pf version does not use managed PCI. */
> > + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > }
> >
> > static void octep_vdpa_vf_bar_shrink(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > @@ -825,7 +828,7 @@ static int octep_vdpa_probe_pf(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev)
> > struct octep_pf *octpf;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
> > + ret = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable device\n");
> > return ret;
> > @@ -834,15 +837,17 @@ static int octep_vdpa_probe_pf(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev)
> > ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "No usable DMA configuration\n");
> > - return ret;
> > + goto disable_pci;
> > }
> > octpf = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*octpf), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!octpf)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + if (!octpf) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto disable_pci;
> > + }
> >
> > ret = octep_iomap_region(pdev, octpf->base,
> > OCTEP_HW_MBOX_BAR);
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto disable_pci;
> >
> > pci_set_master(pdev);
> > pci_set_drvdata(pdev, octpf);
> > @@ -856,6 +861,8 @@ static int octep_vdpa_probe_pf(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev)
> >
> > unmap_region:
> > octep_iounmap_region(pdev, octpf->base, OCTEP_HW_MBOX_BAR);
> > +disable_pci:
> > + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 8:51 [PATCH v4] vdpa/octeon_ep: Control PCI dev enabling manually Philipp Stanner
2025-05-15 7:14 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-15 11:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515072724-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
--cc=sthotton@marvell.com \
--cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).