From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: "Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää" <hannelotta@gmail.com>
Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Improve test output grammar, code style
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:56:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515165629d521d4a2@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515162249.29510-1-hannelotta@gmail.com>
Hello,
On 15/05/2025 19:22:49+0300, Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää wrote:
> Add small grammar fixes in perf events and Real Time Clock tests'
> output messages.
>
> Include braces around a single if statement, when there are multiple
> statements in the else branch, to align with the kernel coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää <hannelotta@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/watermark_signal.c | 7 ++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/watermark_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/watermark_signal.c
> index 49dc1e831174..6176afd4950b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/watermark_signal.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/watermark_signal.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,9 @@ TEST(watermark_signal)
>
> child = fork();
> EXPECT_GE(child, 0);
> - if (child == 0)
> + if (child == 0) {
> do_child();
> + }
This change seems unrelated.
> else if (child < 0) {
> perror("fork()");
> goto cleanup;
> @@ -75,7 +76,7 @@ TEST(watermark_signal)
> if (waitpid(child, &child_status, WSTOPPED) != child ||
> !(WIFSTOPPED(child_status) && WSTOPSIG(child_status) == SIGSTOP)) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> - "failed to sycnhronize with child errno=%d status=%x\n",
> + "failed to synchronize with child errno=%d status=%x\n",
> errno,
> child_status);
> goto cleanup;
> @@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ TEST(watermark_signal)
> fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, child, -1, -1,
> PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
> if (fd < 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "failed opening event %llx\n", attr.config);
> + fprintf(stderr, "failed to setup performance monitoring %llx\n", attr.config);
> goto cleanup;
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> index be175c0e6ae3..8fd4d5d3b527 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> @@ -138,10 +138,10 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, date_read_loop, READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC + 2) {
> rtc_read = rtc_time_to_timestamp(&rtc_tm);
> /* Time should not go backwards */
> ASSERT_LE(prev_rtc_read, rtc_read);
> - /* Time should not increase more then 1s at a time */
> + /* Time should not increase more than 1s per read */
> ASSERT_GE(prev_rtc_read + 1, rtc_read);
>
> - /* Sleep 11ms to avoid killing / overheating the RTC */
> + /* Sleep 11ms to avoid overheating the RTC */
> nanosleep_with_retries(READ_LOOP_SLEEP_MS * 1000000);
>
> prev_rtc_read = rtc_read;
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_alm_set) {
> if (alarm_state == RTC_ALARM_DISABLED)
> SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
> if (alarm_state == RTC_ALARM_RES_MINUTE)
> - SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms has only minute granularity.");
> + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms have only minute granularity.");
I guess the proper fix is to remove the s in alarms as there is only one
alarm.
>
> rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
> ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set) {
> if (alarm_state == RTC_ALARM_DISABLED)
> SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms are not supported.");
> if (alarm_state == RTC_ALARM_RES_MINUTE)
> - SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms has only minute granularity.");
> + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since alarms have only minute granularity.");
>
> rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time);
> ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (access(rtc_file, R_OK) == 0)
> ret = test_harness_run(argc, argv);
> else
> - ksft_exit_skip("[SKIP]: Cannot access rtc file %s - Exiting\n",
> + ksft_exit_skip("Cannot access RTC file %s - exiting\n",
> rtc_file);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.39.5
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 16:22 [PATCH] selftests: Improve test output grammar, code style Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää
2025-05-15 16:56 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2025-05-16 8:44 ` Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515165629d521d4a2@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=hannelotta@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).