From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: selftests: add checksum mode support and SW checksum handling
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 18:48:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516184849.27d795c1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515083100.2653102-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, 15 May 2025 10:30:59 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> +enum net_test_checksum_mode {
> + NET_TEST_CHECKSUM_COMPLETE,
Why COMPLETE? that means skb has checksum of the complete data.
If packet requires no checksumming you should probably use CHECKSUM_NONE
> + switch (iph->protocol) {
> + case IPPROTO_TCP:
> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb,
> + transport_offset + sizeof(struct tcphdr)))
Why are you so diligently checking if you can pull for the SW sum but
not for the HW sum? Both of them update the same header fields :)
> +static int net_test_setup_hw_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iphdr *iph)
> +{
> + u16 csum_offset;
> +
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> + skb->csum = 0;
> +
> + switch (iph->protocol) {
> + case IPPROTO_TCP:
> + if (!tcp_hdr(skb))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + tcp_hdr(skb)->check = 0;
this filed should be filled with pseudo header checksum for HW offload,
not with 0, like the existing code did
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-17 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 8:30 [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: selftest: improve test string formatting and checksum handling Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-15 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: selftests: drop test index from net_selftest_get_strings() Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-15 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: selftests: prepare for detailed error handling in net_test_get_skb() Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-15 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: selftests: add checksum mode support and SW checksum handling Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-16 12:57 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-17 1:48 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-05-15 8:31 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: selftests: add PHY loopback tests with HW checksum offload Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-17 1:45 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: selftest: improve test string formatting and checksum handling Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-20 10:53 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-21 13:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-23 11:45 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-23 17:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-24 8:26 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-24 16:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-25 5:07 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-06-25 20:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-11 8:42 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-07-11 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250516184849.27d795c1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).