From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Split up ttwu_runnable()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:45:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520101727.732703833@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250520094538.086709102@infradead.org
Split up ttwu_runnable() in preparation for more changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3765,6 +3765,25 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct t
#endif
}
+static int __ttwu_runnable(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
+{
+ if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
+ return 0;
+
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
+ if (p->se.sched_delayed)
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_DELAYED);
+ if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
+ /*
+ * When on_rq && !on_cpu the task is preempted, see if
+ * it should preempt the task that is current now.
+ */
+ wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags);
+ }
+ ttwu_do_wakeup(p);
+ return 1;
+}
+
/*
* Consider @p being inside a wait loop:
*
@@ -3792,28 +3811,8 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct t
*/
static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
{
- struct rq_flags rf;
- struct rq *rq;
- int ret = 0;
-
- rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
- if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
- update_rq_clock(rq);
- if (p->se.sched_delayed)
- enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_DELAYED);
- if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
- /*
- * When on_rq && !on_cpu the task is preempted, see if
- * it should preempt the task that is current now.
- */
- wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags);
- }
- ttwu_do_wakeup(p);
- ret = 1;
- }
- __task_rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
-
- return ret;
+ CLASS(__task_rq_lock, guard)(p);
+ return __ttwu_runnable(guard.rq, p, wake_flags);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1831,6 +1831,11 @@ task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct tas
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf->flags);
}
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(__task_rq_lock, struct task_struct,
+ _T->rq = __task_rq_lock(_T->lock, &_T->rf),
+ __task_rq_unlock(_T->rq, &_T->rf),
+ struct rq *rq; struct rq_flags rf)
+
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(task_rq_lock, struct task_struct,
_T->rq = task_rq_lock(_T->lock, &_T->rf),
task_rq_unlock(_T->rq, _T->lock, &_T->rf),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2025-06-13 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-09 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-06-13 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2025-05-20 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 15:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-11 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-06-06 16:18 ` Phil Auld
2025-06-16 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 7:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-06-13 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 8:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-28 19:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Try and address some recent-ish regressions Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 1:41 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-14 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-16 0:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-29 10:18 ` Beata Michalska
2025-05-30 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-30 10:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-06-02 4:44 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-13 3:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-14 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250520101727.732703833@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).