From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/retbleed: Check for AUTO in all cases
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 10:42:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250522174219.75uajbghvnnnvcmk@desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250522112730.GFaC8KIk7jbj4EyoV7@fat_crate.local>
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 01:27:30PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 07:44:22PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > When none of mitigation option is selected, AUTO gets converted to NONE.
> > This is currently only being done for Intel. The check is useful in
> > general, make it common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > index 7f94e6a5497d9a2d312a76095e48d6b364565777..19ff705b3128eacad5659990ed345d7a19bcb0f4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > @@ -1294,15 +1294,15 @@ static void __init retbleed_update_mitigation(void)
> > if (retbleed_mitigation != RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF)
> > pr_err(RETBLEED_INTEL_MSG);
> > }
> > - /* If nothing has set the mitigation yet, default to NONE. */
> > - if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_AUTO)
> > - retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* If nothing has set the mitigation yet, default to NONE. */
> > + if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_AUTO)
> > + retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
> > out:
> > pr_info("%s\n", retbleed_strings[retbleed_mitigation]);
> > }
>
> So, the way I see it is, AUTO means user didn't select anything so we will
> select the default thing.
>
> And we do that in the select function.
>
> But then in the update function we bring back AUTO from the dead again,
> forcing us to having to deal with it, well, again.
>
> So can we simply set to RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE in the retbleed + its = stuff
> option when SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE not selected?
That can be done.
> This'll get rid of the AUTO crap.
Yup.
> For that, the select function should probably select something else from AUTO
> on Intel too.
>
> My point is, let's deal with AUTO in the select functions only and then forget
> it from then on...
>
> Right?
Yes, makes sense to me.
This is how it is looking:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index ad04da8711b2..156fee146228 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -1264,6 +1264,13 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void)
retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB;
else
retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
+ } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED))
+ retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_EIBRS;
+ else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS))
+ retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBRS;
+ else
+ retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
}
}
@@ -1272,9 +1279,6 @@ static void __init retbleed_update_mitigation(void)
if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_RETBLEED) || cpu_mitigations_off())
return;
- if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE)
- goto out;
-
/* ITS can also enable stuffing */
if (its_mitigation == ITS_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE_STUFF)
retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF;
@@ -1282,7 +1286,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_update_mitigation(void)
if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF &&
!cdt_possible(spectre_v2_enabled)) {
pr_err("WARNING: retbleed=stuff depends on retpoline\n");
- retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_AUTO;
+ retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
}
/*
@@ -1305,10 +1309,6 @@ static void __init retbleed_update_mitigation(void)
}
}
- /* If nothing has set the mitigation yet, default to NONE. */
- if (retbleed_mitigation == RETBLEED_MITIGATION_AUTO)
- retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE;
-out:
pr_info("%s\n", retbleed_strings[retbleed_mitigation]);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 2:44 [PATCH v2 0/7] eIBRS fixes Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/retbleed: Check for AUTO in all cases Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 9:52 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-05-22 11:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-22 17:42 ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2025-05-22 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/retbleed: Simplify the =stuff checks Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 10:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-05-22 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-22 18:02 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/bugs: Exit early if return thunk is already set Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 10:22 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-05-22 10:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-05-22 18:03 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/its: Use switch/case to apply mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 11:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-05-22 18:04 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] x86/retbleed: Introduce cdt_possible() Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/its: Remove =stuff dependency on retbleed Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86/its: Allow stuffing in eIBRS+retpoline mode also Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250522174219.75uajbghvnnnvcmk@desk \
--to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox