linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	willy@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kernel_team@skhynix.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, harry.yoo@oracle.com,
	hawk@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, toke@redhat.com,
	tariqt@nvidia.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, david@redhat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, vishal.moola@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] page_pool: use netmem APIs to access page->pp_magic in page_pool_page_is_pp()
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 17:14:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250528081403.GA28116@system.software.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4ff25cb-e31f-4ed7-a3b9-867b861b17bd@gmail.com>

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/26/25 03:23, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:21:17AM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:26 PM Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > To simplify struct page, the effort to seperate its own descriptor from
> > > > struct page is required and the work for page pool is on going.
> > > > 
> > > > To achieve that, all the code should avoid accessing page pool members
> > > > of struct page directly, but use safe APIs for the purpose.
> > > > 
> > > > Use netmem_is_pp() instead of directly accessing page->pp_magic in
> > > > page_pool_page_is_pp().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   include/linux/mm.h   | 5 +----
> > > >   net/core/page_pool.c | 5 +++++
> > > >   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > index 8dc012e84033..3f7c80fb73ce 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > @@ -4312,10 +4312,7 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status);
> > > >   #define PP_MAGIC_MASK ~(PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK | 0x3UL)
> > > > 
> > > >   #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
> > > > -static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page)
> > > > -{
> > > > -       return (page->pp_magic & PP_MAGIC_MASK) == PP_SIGNATURE;
> > > > -}
> > > 
> > > I vote for keeping this function as-is (do not convert it to netmem),
> > > and instead modify it to access page->netmem_desc->pp_magic.
> > 
> > Once the page pool fields are removed from struct page, struct page will
> > have neither struct netmem_desc nor the fields..
> > 
> > So it's unevitable to cast it to netmem_desc in order to refer to
> > pp_magic.  Again, pp_magic is no longer associated to struct page.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Once the indirection / page shrinking is realized, the page is
> supposed to have a type field, isn't it? And all pp_magic trickery
> will be replaced with something like
> 
> page_pool_page_is_pp() { return page->type == PAGE_TYPE_PP; }

Agree, but we need a temporary solution until then.  I will use the
following way for now:

   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250528051452.GB59539@system.software.com/

	Byungchul
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-28  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23  3:25 [PATCH 00/18] Split netmem from struct page Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 01/18] netmem: introduce struct netmem_desc struct_group_tagged()'ed on struct net_iov Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  9:01   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-26  0:56     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-23 17:00   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-26  1:15     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-27  2:50   ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-27 20:03     ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-28  1:21       ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  3:47         ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-28  5:03           ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  7:43             ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-28  8:17               ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  7:38         ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 02/18] netmem: introduce netmem alloc APIs to wrap page alloc APIs Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 03/18] page_pool: use netmem alloc/put APIs in __page_pool_alloc_page_order() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 04/18] page_pool: rename __page_pool_alloc_page_order() to __page_pool_alloc_large_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 05/18] page_pool: use netmem alloc/put APIs in __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 06/18] page_pool: rename page_pool_return_page() to page_pool_return_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  3:18   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 07/18] page_pool: use netmem put API in page_pool_return_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 08/18] page_pool: rename __page_pool_release_page_dma() to __page_pool_release_netmem_dma() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 09/18] page_pool: rename __page_pool_put_page() to __page_pool_put_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 10/18] page_pool: rename __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow() to __page_pool_alloc_netmems_slow() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 11/18] mlx4: use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 12/18] page_pool: use netmem APIs to access page->pp_magic in page_pool_page_is_pp() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  8:58   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-23 17:21   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-26  2:23     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26  2:36       ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26  8:40         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-26  9:43           ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26  9:54             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-26 10:01               ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  5:14               ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  7:35                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-28  8:15                   ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  7:51       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-28  8:14         ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2025-05-28  9:07           ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-28  9:14             ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  9:20               ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-28  9:33                 ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  9:51                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-28 10:44                     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28 10:54                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 13/18] mlx5: use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool Byungchul Park
2025-05-23 17:13   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-26  3:08     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26  8:12       ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26 18:00         ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 14/18] netmem: use _Generic to cover const casting for page_to_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23 17:14   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 15/18] netmem: remove __netmem_get_pp() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 16/18] page_pool: make page_pool_get_dma_addr() just wrap page_pool_get_dma_addr_netmem() Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 17/18] netdevsim: use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool Byungchul Park
2025-05-23  3:26 ` [PATCH 18/18] mm, netmem: remove the page pool members in struct page Byungchul Park
2025-05-23 17:16   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-23 17:55   ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-26  1:37     ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-26 16:58       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-26 17:33         ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-27  1:02         ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-27  1:31           ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-27  5:30           ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-27 17:38             ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-28  1:31               ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-28  7:21               ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-23  6:20 ` [PATCH 00/18] Split netmem from " Taehee Yoo
2025-05-23  7:47   ` Byungchul Park
2025-05-23 17:47 ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-26  1:16   ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250528081403.GA28116@system.software.com \
    --to=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).