From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Ronak Doshi <ronak.doshi@broadcom.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Guolin Yang <guolin.yang@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vmxnet3: correctly report gso type for UDP tunnels
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 16:33:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529163354.1d85c025@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP1Q3XQcYD3nGdojPWS7K4fczNYsNzv0S0O4P8DJvQtRM9Ef1g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 29 May 2025 14:55:20 -0700 Ronak Doshi wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:10 AM Ronak Doshi <ronak.doshi@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:30 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If otherwise the traffic goes into the UDP tunnel rx path, such
> > > processing will set the needed field correctly and no issue could/should
> > > be observed AFAICS.
> > >
> > > @Ronak: I think the problem pre-exists this specific patch, but since
> > > you are fixing the relevant offload, I think it should be better to
> > > address the problem now.
> > >
> > Can we apply this fix which unblocks one of our customer case and address this
> > concern as a separate patch as it has been there for a while and it
> > has a workaround
> > of enabling tnl segmentation on the redirected interface? I think it
> > might require quite
> > some change in vmxnet3 to address this concern and can be done as a
> > different patch.
> > Meanwhile, I will raise an internal (broadcom) PR for recreating this
> > specific issue.
> >
> Hello Jakub,
> Any update on this? Can you help apply this patch?
You put Paolo in the To: field, so I assumed your messages are directed
to him. I'm not entirely sure what you're proposing, to apply this
patch as is? Whether your driver supports segmentation or not - it
should not send mangled skbs into the stack. Maybe send a v2 and
explain next steps in the commit message, less guessing the better..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 21:05 [PATCH net] vmxnet3: correctly report gso type for UDP tunnels Ronak Doshi
2025-05-15 14:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 20:38 ` Ronak Doshi
2025-05-15 21:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 23:38 ` Ronak Doshi
2025-05-19 7:32 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-05-19 7:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-05-27 16:10 ` Ronak Doshi
2025-05-29 21:55 ` Ronak Doshi
2025-05-29 23:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-05-30 0:50 ` Ronak Doshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250529163354.1d85c025@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guolin.yang@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ronak.doshi@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).