From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Ingo Saitz <ingo@hannover.ccc.de>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hardening fixes for v6.16-rc1
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 22:42:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202505312229.DE917E6D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjktqa94u_=++YX7XxUr57iLAs1GqtHPOY-o-N0z7wyeA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 07:35:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2025 at 18:06, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea. I had noticed a bunch of my trees were refusing to have sane merges.
>
> The rebased history would explain that, but the reason I'm upset about
> it is that I don't even see how that rebasing could possibly happen
> "by mistake".
>
> Any normal git merge rebasing should re-write the committer. So to get
> the kinds of rewritten history that I saw, it almost has to be
> intentional. I don't see how that has happened by mistake.
>
> At a minimum there is some truly effed up scripting going on.
Well, I didn't do it on purpose. I think I have an established track
record of asking you first before I intentionally do stupid things with
git (like the recent prefix collision PoC[1] that I privately emailed
you about).
I'm trying to figure it out now. I must have shot myself in the foot
somewhere, since I had a number of "by hand" things going on this week.
My current guess (while AFK) was that something went sideways while
trying to rebase my for-next/hardening vs my for-linus/hardening trees,
since I had, at one point, based my for-next on
9d7a0577c9db35c4cc52db90bc415ea248446472 (1 commit past v6.15-rc3) since
I was still working on -Wunterminated-string-initialization patches.
(Normally I exclusively base on -rc2.) Then I had my SSD failure, but
things seemed okay after that, but then when I built the
for-linus/hardening tree I rebased patches that were on top of for-next
over on to latest "master" because basing it on 1 past rc3 seemed weird.
It was around here that I started having problems.
But like I said, I'll see if I can reproduce it. I have a lot of
scripting to sanity check my pushes, and I (stupidly) overrode them
because normally they get angry when I'm not basing on rc2, etc. But
I've never had anything like this happen.
-Kees
[1] https://people.kernel.org/kees/colliding-with-the-sha-prefix-of-linuxs-initial-git-commit
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-01 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-31 15:00 [GIT PULL] hardening fixes for v6.16-rc1 Kees Cook
2025-05-31 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-31 19:21 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-05-31 19:57 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-05-31 21:36 ` Al Viro
2025-06-01 1:06 ` Kees Cook
2025-06-01 2:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-01 2:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-01 5:42 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-06-01 7:42 ` Kees Cook
2025-06-01 14:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-06-01 15:38 ` Kees Cook
2025-06-01 17:58 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-06-01 18:56 ` Kees Cook
2025-06-03 12:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-01 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-01 17:49 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-06-01 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-03 12:42 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202505312229.DE917E6D@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=ingo@hannover.ccc.de \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox