From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add control driver for ST M24LR RFID/NFC EEPROM chips
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 17:50:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025060109-renderer-revisable-a135@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250601153022.2027919-1-abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 03:30:18PM +0000, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
> This patch series adds support for the control interface of STMicroelectronics
> M24LR RFID/NFC EEPROM devices, such as the M24LR04E-R. The chip exposes two
> I2C addresses and two distinct address spaces: one for the system parameter
> sector and another for the EEPROM memory. These address spaces overlap (both
> start at address 0). Due to this overlap, the chip cannot be represented by a
> single Device Tree node and handled by the standard at24 driver.
>
> While it might be possible to model the system parameter sector and EEPROM
> as two separate DT nodes, each handled by the standard at24 driver, this
> leads to synchronization problems. For example, if a multi-page EEPROM write
> is in progress and a control command (e.g., a i2c write lock) is issued
> concurrently, it can result in incomplete or inconsistent writeing.
>
> To overcome these issues, while maintaining a clean architecture and ensuring
> synchronization, the chip is managed by two drivers:
>
> 1- The first driver exposes the system parameter sector and acts as an I2C mux
> (gate) for EEPROM access. Using an I2C mux solves the synchronization issue.
> This patch series implements this driver.
> 2- The second is the standard at24 driver, which handles the EEPROM.
>
> Tested on: M24LR04E-R using Yocto on Raspberry Pi 4
>
> Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
>
> Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi (3):
> dt-bindings: eeprom: Add ST M24LR control interface
> misc: add sysfs control driver for ST M24LR series RFID/NFC chips
> ABI: sysfs: document control attributes for ST M24LR
>
> .../testing/sysfs-bus-i2c-devices-m24lr_ctl | 96 +++
> .../devicetree/bindings/eeprom/st,m24lr.yaml | 72 ++
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 15 +
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/m24lr_ctl.c | 677 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 861 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i2c-devices-m24lr_ctl
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/st,m24lr.yaml
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/m24lr_ctl.c
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-01 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-01 15:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add control driver for ST M24LR RFID/NFC EEPROM chips Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-01 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: eeprom: Add ST M24LR control interface Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-01 15:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-02 3:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Add Device Tree binding for " Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-02 6:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-02 17:23 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-02 18:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-02 17:47 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-01 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: eeprom: Add " Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-06-03 5:40 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-03 6:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-01 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] misc: add sysfs control driver for ST M24LR series RFID/NFC chips Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-01 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ABI: sysfs: document control attributes for ST M24LR Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2025-06-01 15:50 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025060109-renderer-revisable-a135@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=abd.masalkhi@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).