From: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"David Laight" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: uaccess: do not do misaligned accesses in get/put_user()
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 21:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250602193918.868962-4-cleger@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250602193918.868962-1-cleger@rivosinc.com>
Doing misaligned access to userspace memory would make a trap on
platform where it is emulated. Latest fixes removed the kernel
capability to do unaligned accesses to userspace memory safely since
interrupts are kept disabled at all time during that. Thus doing so
would crash the kernel.
Such behavior was detected with GET_UNALIGN_CTL() that was doing
a put_user() with an unsigned long* address that should have been an
unsigned int*. Reenabling kernel misaligned access emulation is a bit
risky and it would also degrade performances. Rather than doing that,
we will try to avoid any misaligned accessed by using copy_from/to_user()
which does not do any misaligned accesses. This can be done only for
!CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and thus allows to only generate
a bit more code for this config.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 046de7ced09c..d472da4450e6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -169,8 +169,19 @@ do { \
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
+unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_to_user_sum_enabled(void __user *to,
+ const void *from, unsigned long n);
+unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_from_user_sum_enabled(void *to,
+ const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
+
#define __get_user_nocheck(x, __gu_ptr, label) \
do { \
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && \
+ !IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)__gu_ptr, sizeof(*__gu_ptr))) { \
+ if (__asm_copy_from_user_sum_enabled(&(x), __gu_ptr, sizeof(*__gu_ptr))) \
+ goto label; \
+ break; \
+ } \
switch (sizeof(*__gu_ptr)) { \
case 1: \
__get_user_asm("lb", (x), __gu_ptr, label); \
@@ -297,6 +308,13 @@ do { \
#define __put_user_nocheck(x, __gu_ptr, label) \
do { \
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && \
+ !IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)__gu_ptr, sizeof(*__gu_ptr))) { \
+ __inttype(x) val = (__inttype(x))x; \
+ if (__asm_copy_to_user_sum_enabled(__gu_ptr, &(val), sizeof(*__gu_ptr))) \
+ goto label; \
+ break; \
+ } \
switch (sizeof(*__gu_ptr)) { \
case 1: \
__put_user_asm("sb", (x), __gu_ptr, label); \
@@ -450,11 +468,6 @@ static inline void user_access_restore(unsigned long enabled) { }
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
} while (0)
-unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_to_user_sum_enabled(void __user *to,
- const void *from, unsigned long n);
-unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_from_user_sum_enabled(void *to,
- const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
-
#define unsafe_copy_to_user(_dst, _src, _len, label) \
if (__asm_copy_to_user_sum_enabled(_dst, _src, _len)) \
goto label;
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 19:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: misaligned: fix misaligned accesses handling in put/get_user() Clément Léger
2025-06-02 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: make unsafe user copy routines use existing assembly routines Clément Léger
2025-06-02 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: process: use unsigned int instead of unsigned long for put_user() Clément Léger
2025-06-04 11:55 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-06-02 19:39 ` Clément Léger [this message]
2025-06-04 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: uaccess: do not do misaligned accesses in get/put_user() Alexandre Ghiti
2025-06-02 21:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: misaligned: fix misaligned accesses handling in put/get_user() David Laight
2025-06-03 7:32 ` Clément Léger
2025-06-05 18:50 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250602193918.868962-4-cleger@rivosinc.com \
--to=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox