From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: jarkko@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
jgg@ziepe.ca, stuart.yoder@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Change initcall level of ffa_init() to rootfs_initcall
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 07:03:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610060334.2149041-2-yeoreum.yun@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610060334.2149041-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
The Linux IMA (Integrity Measurement Architecture) subsystem used for secure
boot, file integrity, or remote attestation cannot be a loadable module
for few reasons listed below:
o Boot-Time Integrity: IMA’s main role is to measure and appraise files
before they are used. This includes measuring critical system files during
early boot (e.g., init, init scripts, login binaries). If IMA were a module,
it would be loaded too late to cover those.
o TPM Dependency: IMA integrates tightly with the TPM to record measurements
into PCRs. The TPM must be initialized early (ideally before init_ima()),
which aligns with IMA being built-in.
o Security Model: IMA is part of a Trusted Computing Base (TCB). Making it a
module would weaken the security model, as a potentially compromised system
could delay or tamper with its initialization.
IMA must be built-in to ensure it starts measuring from the earliest possible
point in boot which inturn implies TPM must be initialised and ready to use
before IMA.
To enable integration of tpm_event_log with the IMA subsystem, the TPM drivers
(tpm_crb and tpm_crb_ffa) also needs to be built-in. However with FF-A driver
also being initialised at device initcall level, it can lead to an
initialization order issue where:
- crb_acpi_driver_init() may run before tpm_crb_ffa_driver()_init and ffa_init()
- As a result, probing the TPM device via CRB over FFA is deferred
- ima_init() (called as a late initcall) runs before deferred probe completes,
IMA fails to find the TPM and logs the below error:
| ima: No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass!
Eventually it fails to generate boot_aggregate with PCR values.
Because of the above stated dependency, the ffa driver needs to initialised
before tpm_crb_ffa module to ensure IMA finds the TPM successfully when
present.
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
index fe55613a8ea9..1a690b8186df 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __init ffa_init(void)
kfree(drv_info);
return ret;
}
-module_init(ffa_init);
+rootfs_initcall(ffa_init);
static void __exit ffa_exit(void)
{
--
LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 6:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] fix failure of integration IMA with tpm_crb_ffa Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-10 6:03 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-06-10 6:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: manually register tpm_crb_ffa driver when it's built-in Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-10 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix failure of integration IMA with tpm_crb_ffa Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-06-10 13:18 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-10 13:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-06-10 14:38 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-10 14:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-06-10 15:22 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 16:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-06-11 17:36 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-12 10:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-06-12 13:25 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250610060334.2149041-2-yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stuart.yoder@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox