The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Eddie James <eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: occ: fix unaligned accesses
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:25:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610092553.2641094-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Passing a pointer to an unaligned integer as a function argument is
undefined behavior:

drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c:492:27: warning: taking address of packed member 'accumulator' of class or structure 'power_sensor_2' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
  492 |   val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->accumulator,
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c:493:13: warning: taking address of packed member 'update_tag' of class or structure 'power_sensor_2' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
  493 |            &power->update_tag);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Move the get_unaligned() calls out of the function and pass these
through argument registers instead.

Fixes: c10e753d43eb ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
index 9029ad53790b..b3694a4209b9 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
@@ -459,12 +459,10 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_1(struct device *dev,
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", val);
 }
 
-static u64 occ_get_powr_avg(u64 *accum, u32 *samples)
+static u64 occ_get_powr_avg(u64 accum, u32 samples)
 {
-	u64 divisor = get_unaligned_be32(samples);
-
-	return (divisor == 0) ? 0 :
-		div64_u64(get_unaligned_be64(accum) * 1000000ULL, divisor);
+	return (samples == 0) ? 0 :
+		mul_u64_u32_div(accum, 1000000UL, samples);
 }
 
 static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev,
@@ -489,8 +487,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev,
 				  get_unaligned_be32(&power->sensor_id),
 				  power->function_id, power->apss_channel);
 	case 1:
-		val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->accumulator,
-				       &power->update_tag);
+		val = occ_get_powr_avg(get_unaligned_be64(&power->accumulator),
+				       get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag));
 		break;
 	case 2:
 		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
@@ -527,8 +525,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u_system\n",
 				  get_unaligned_be32(&power->sensor_id));
 	case 1:
-		val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->system.accumulator,
-				       &power->system.update_tag);
+		val = occ_get_powr_avg(get_unaligned_be64(&power->system.accumulator),
+				       get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag));
 		break;
 	case 2:
 		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) *
@@ -541,8 +539,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u_proc\n",
 				  get_unaligned_be32(&power->sensor_id));
 	case 5:
-		val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->proc.accumulator,
-				       &power->proc.update_tag);
+		val = occ_get_powr_avg(get_unaligned_be64(&power->proc.accumulator),
+				       get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag));
 		break;
 	case 6:
 		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) *
@@ -555,8 +553,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u_vdd\n",
 				  get_unaligned_be32(&power->sensor_id));
 	case 9:
-		val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->vdd.accumulator,
-				       &power->vdd.update_tag);
+		val = occ_get_powr_avg(get_unaligned_be64(&power->vdd.accumulator),
+				       get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag));
 		break;
 	case 10:
 		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) *
@@ -569,8 +567,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u_vdn\n",
 				  get_unaligned_be32(&power->sensor_id));
 	case 13:
-		val = occ_get_powr_avg(&power->vdn.accumulator,
-				       &power->vdn.update_tag);
+		val = occ_get_powr_avg(get_unaligned_be64(&power->vdn.accumulator),
+				       get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag));
 		break;
 	case 14:
 		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
-- 
2.39.5


             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10  9:25 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-06-10 20:52 ` [PATCH] hwmon: occ: fix unaligned accesses Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610092553.2641094-1-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox