From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched: Remove a preempt-disable section in rt_mutex_setprio()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:54:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611095400.g8lgs-Tq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611090306.GA2273038@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
rt_mutex_setprio() has only one caller: rt_mutex_adjust_prio(). It
expects that task_struct::pi_lock and rt_mutex_base::wait_lock are held.
Both locks are raw_spinlock_t and are acquired with disabled interrupts.
Nevertheless rt_mutex_setprio() disables preemption while invoking
__balance_callbacks() and raw_spin_rq_unlock(). Even if the possible
balance callbacks unlock the rq they must not enable interrupts as I
doubt that they also unlock rt_mutex_base::wait_lock.
Therefore interrupts should remain disabled and disabling preemption is
not needed.
Commit 4c9a4bc89a9cc ("sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()")
adds a preempt-disable section to rt_mutex_setprio() and
__sched_setscheduler(). In __sched_setscheduler() the preemption is
disabled before rq is unlocked and interrupts enabled but I don't see
why it makes a difference in rt_mutex_setprio().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
v2…v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250610144700.uBK6RS95@linutronix.de/
- Add a comment why IRQs are still disabled.
v1…v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250513142954.ZM5QSQNc@linutronix.de/
- Repost without RFC
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index dce50fa57471d..537212b33fd84 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7292,14 +7292,11 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *pi_task)
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
out_unlock:
- /* Avoid rq from going away on us: */
- preempt_disable();
+ /* Caller holds task_struct::pi_lock, IRQs are still disabled */
rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf);
__balance_callbacks(rq);
raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
-
- preempt_enable();
}
#endif
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 14:47 [PATCH v2] sched: Remove a preempt-disable section in rt_mutex_setprio() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-06-11 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-11 9:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-06-11 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250611095400.g8lgs-Tq@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox