From: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
changwoo@igalia.com, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw,
yphbchou0911@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] sched_ext: Clean up and standardize #if/#else/#endif markers in sched/ext.c
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 21:54:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611135404.13851-2-yphbchou0911@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611135404.13851-1-yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Simplify the scheduler by making formerly SMP-only primitives and data
structures unconditional.
Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 26 +-------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 2c41c78be61e..55702b7a72e2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1792,12 +1792,10 @@ static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
process_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static void deferred_bal_cb_workfn(struct rq *rq)
{
run_deferred(rq);
}
-#endif
static void deferred_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)
{
@@ -1820,7 +1818,6 @@ static void schedule_deferred(struct rq *rq)
{
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If in the middle of waking up a task, task_woken_scx() will be called
* afterwards which will then run the deferred actions, no need to
@@ -1838,7 +1835,7 @@ static void schedule_deferred(struct rq *rq)
deferred_bal_cb_workfn);
return;
}
-#endif
+
/*
* No scheduler hooks available. Queue an irq work. They are executed on
* IRQ re-enable which may take a bit longer than the scheduler hooks.
@@ -2542,7 +2539,6 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/**
* move_remote_task_to_local_dsq - Move a task from a foreign rq to a local DSQ
* @p: task to move
@@ -2709,11 +2705,6 @@ static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p,
return false;
}
}
-#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
-static inline void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags, struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq) { WARN_ON_ONCE(1); }
-static inline bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, bool enforce) { return false; }
-static inline bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *p, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *task_rq) { return false; }
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/**
* move_task_between_dsqs() - Move a task from one DSQ to another
@@ -2886,9 +2877,7 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
{
struct rq *src_rq = task_rq(p);
struct rq *dst_rq = container_of(dst_dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct rq *locked_rq = rq;
-#endif
/*
* We're synchronized against dequeue through DISPATCHING. As @p can't
@@ -2902,7 +2891,6 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
return;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (src_rq != dst_rq &&
unlikely(!task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, dst_rq, true))) {
dispatch_enqueue(sch, find_global_dsq(p), p,
@@ -2962,9 +2950,6 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
raw_spin_rq_unlock(locked_rq);
raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
}
-#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
- BUG(); /* control can not reach here on UP */
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
}
/**
@@ -3288,10 +3273,8 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
static enum scx_cpu_preempt_reason
preempt_reason_from_class(const struct sched_class *class)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (class == &stop_sched_class)
return SCX_CPU_PREEMPT_STOP;
-#endif
if (class == &dl_sched_class)
return SCX_CPU_PREEMPT_DL;
if (class == &rt_sched_class)
@@ -3304,14 +3287,12 @@ static void switch_class(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
struct scx_sched *sch = scx_root;
const struct sched_class *next_class = next->sched_class;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Pairs with the smp_load_acquire() issued by a CPU in
* kick_cpus_irq_workfn() who is waiting for this CPU to perform a
* resched.
*/
smp_store_release(&rq->scx.pnt_seq, rq->scx.pnt_seq + 1);
-#endif
if (!(sch->ops.flags & SCX_OPS_HAS_CPU_PREEMPT))
return;
@@ -3508,8 +3489,6 @@ bool scx_prio_less(const struct task_struct *a, const struct task_struct *b,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-
static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
{
struct scx_sched *sch = scx_root;
@@ -3639,7 +3618,6 @@ static void rq_offline_scx(struct rq *rq)
rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_ONLINE;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static bool check_rq_for_timeouts(struct rq *rq)
{
@@ -4299,14 +4277,12 @@ DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(ext) = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_scx,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_scx,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_scx,
.task_woken = task_woken_scx,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_scx,
.rq_online = rq_online_scx,
.rq_offline = rq_offline_scx,
-#endif
.task_tick = task_tick_scx,
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 13:54 [PATCH 0/4] sched_ext: Standardize preprocessor comment markers Cheng-Yang Chou
2025-06-11 13:54 ` Cheng-Yang Chou [this message]
2025-06-11 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched_ext: Clean up and standardize #if/#else/#endif markers in sched/ext.h Cheng-Yang Chou
2025-06-11 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Clean up and standardize #if/#else/#endif markers in sched/ext_idle.c Cheng-Yang Chou
2025-06-14 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-11 13:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched_ext: Clean up and standardize #if/#else/#endif markers in sched/ext_idle.h Cheng-Yang Chou
2025-06-14 0:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched_ext: Standardize preprocessor comment markers Tejun Heo
2025-06-14 8:06 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250611135404.13851-2-yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
--to=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox