From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38AC239E9E; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749738601; cv=none; b=YOdjIo3Y6bMBK+OoUrlQy2kCtiHU8KS8L4GY4ho72nT6o7W8dkdW5wmRRz5xy7j6ddh8LjU7Ppp0k11rXHB62k4Z0ZZphn+LNd0BBC0vG9Aw1Vrx9d+4v8W5h8Z1lzw9qtBE/txpJMJO+0JNmDV02QH3gNenrYibjblR5/d+JBQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749738601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=29yOxaK9p38k0aPrPa8VqKFwIrBVus6+IDqlxrTtKTI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WgBD6Ho+yKZAvMwHQeeBp4a1V+q9x3dtwuCTJnkggtsR9jFV6/irp3ADvsT296sHnSQB1hf1WDKpuohyIMNztmPx9vXxg5+xUBmFM8xi5qXXl6BFvIbjXGSVBBLo7JH55YtKiazZpOVY4KrMRwmTkk06dgZav45Qpx8VTpBvAX4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Sf++W1Qx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Sf++W1Qx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3C06C4CEEA; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:30:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749738601; bh=29yOxaK9p38k0aPrPa8VqKFwIrBVus6+IDqlxrTtKTI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sf++W1Qx0TxhCH+KhNrnHX0hTBpX+/2RCoA6MvUUgbzyRD96alhenO9ZRM2efIZIY zbq13ej8blySQdPH2vMRnZn+POBRUx33omcQBp6PzYDdOTRRXOvjhWeJ1HMBP933+0 Ow0A7oEsdzS/4aYuy3TlrZo2cv3Lxgiag/NrNI0VYrvlz+tLtVUCcpz5gYyCZAF58M i6jf0LR25NpD3//GU8wBOKTexJD+jm/SWsi7NfUMRvt4nA+A0pXyOMxy0jzW01RsE8 lMAYhHf03TOZ3t0nq6AM2Xt32736kfsc6sKAJnAlscOsjLohCXovwsC+fTv6QqcY0V zvoAbf6SCl7ow== Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:29:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ruben Kelevra Cc: Charalampos Mitrodimas , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: pfcp: fix typo in message_priority field name Message-ID: <20250612072959.431b9385@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250610160612.268612-1-rubenkelevra@gmail.com> <87cybbzbe3.fsf@posteo.net> <20250611145144.2bc0a7b7@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:38:20 +0200 Ruben Kelevra wrote: > I hit it while building an out-of-tree module that reads hdr->message_pri= ority. > Cross-compiling for a big-endian target failed for me, because of it. >=20 > That=E2=80=99s the only reason for the patch; net-next is fine, no need f= or stable. I see, please go ahead and repost with [PATCH net-next], no stable cc and no fixes tag. Would also be good to mention in the commit message that it does not currently cause kernel build issues, but is clearly incorrect.