public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com,
	Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 next 00/10] Implement mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup()
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:59:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250614125915.65c77f87@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250614102717.GK2278213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:27:17 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:53:36AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > The pwm-stm32.c code wants a 'rounding up' version of mul_u64_u64_div_u64().
> > This can be done simply by adding 'divisor - 1' to the 128bit product.
> > Implement mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, c, d) = (a * b + c)/d based on the
> > existing code.
> > Define mul_u64_u64_div_u64(a, b, d) as mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, 0, d) and
> > mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup(a, b, d) as mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, d-1, d).  
> 
> Another way to achieve the same would to to expose the remainder of
> mul_u64_64_div_u64(), no?

The optimised paths for small products don't give the remainder.
And you don't want to do the multiply again to generate it.

As well as the conditional increment you'd also need another test
for the quotient overflowing.

Adding 'c' to the product is cheap.

	David

      reply	other threads:[~2025-06-14 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-14  9:53 [PATCH v3 next 00/10] Implement mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup() David Laight
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 01/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() rename parameter 'c' to 'd' David Laight
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 02/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() Use WARN_ONCE() for divide errors David Laight
2025-06-14 15:17   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14 21:26     ` David Laight
2025-06-14 22:23       ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 03/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() simplify check for a 64bit product David Laight
2025-06-14 14:01   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 04/10] lib: Add mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64() and mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup() David Laight
2025-06-14 14:06   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 05/10] lib: Add tests for mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup() David Laight
2025-06-14 15:19   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-17  4:30   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-09-18 14:00     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-09-18 21:06       ` David Laight
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 06/10] lib: test_mul_u64_u64_div_u64: Test both generic and arch versions David Laight
2025-06-14 15:25   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18  1:39     ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 07/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() optimise multiply on 32bit x86 David Laight
2025-06-14 15:31   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 08/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() Separate multiply to a helper for clarity David Laight
2025-06-14 15:37   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14 21:30     ` David Laight
2025-06-14 22:27       ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 09/10] lib: mul_u64_u64_div_u64() Optimise the divide code David Laight
2025-06-17  4:16   ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18  1:33     ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18  9:16       ` David Laight
2025-06-18 15:39         ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18 16:42           ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18 17:54           ` David Laight
2025-06-18 20:12             ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-18 22:26               ` David Laight
2025-06-19  2:43                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-06-19  8:32                   ` David Laight
2025-06-26 21:46       ` David Laight
2025-06-27  3:48         ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-07-09 14:24   ` David Laight
2025-07-10  9:39     ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-10 10:35       ` David Laight
2025-07-11 21:17     ` David Laight
2025-07-11 21:40       ` Nicolas Pitre
2025-07-14  7:06         ` David Laight
2025-06-14  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 next 10/10] lib: test_mul_u64_u64_div_u64: Test the 32bit code on 64bit David Laight
2025-06-14 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 next 00/10] Implement mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-14 11:59   ` David Laight [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250614125915.65c77f87@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npitre@baylibre.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox