linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mikołaj Lenczewski" <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: yang@os.amperecomputing.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	david@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	jsnitsel@redhat.com, mshavit@google.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:51:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619115155.GB20673@e133081.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c6f1c91-176c-4382-b631-79948e8de16f@arm.com>

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 19/06/2025 09:57, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:07:41PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> >> On 17/06/2025 10:51, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PAN
> >>>  static void cpu_enable_pan(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> >>>  {
> >>> @@ -2980,6 +3015,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> >>>  		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> >>>  		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, EVT, IMP)
> >>>  	},
> >>> +	{
> >>> +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_BBML2_NOABORT,
> >>> +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_EARLY_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
> >>> +		.matches = has_bbml2_noabort,
> >>
> >> Is there a reason you have removed the .desc from this? Without it, the kernel
> >> won't print a "detected" line when it enables the feature. Previously you had:
> >>
> >> 		.desc = "BBM Level 2 without conflict abort",
> >>
> >>> +	},
> >>>  	{
> >>>  		.desc = "52-bit Virtual Addressing for KVM (LPA2)",
> >>>  		.capability = ARM64_HAS_LPA2, 
> >>
> > 
> > Damn it! I completely forgot to birng that back. Yet another remenant of
> > the NO_BBML2_NOABORT version we had discussed in v6, because a
> > description field would have been confusing due to the double negation:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/83d1f7af-3dc7-45f9-94f3-8a0917c051d2@arm.com/
> > 
> > Thank you very much for spotting this Ryan! Ill return the description,
> > and respin on Monday (unless it is possible to do this as a RESEND or
> > similar, but I doubt it since this is technically a functional change) :/
> > 
> 
> I think probably just send out a new version.
> 

ACK

-- 
Kind regards,
Mikołaj Lenczewski

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17  9:51 [PATCH v7 0/4] Initial BBML2 support for contpte_convert() Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: cpufeature: Introduce MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS capability type Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17 10:20   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17 10:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-18 14:07   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-19  8:57     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19  9:20       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-19 11:51         ` Mikołaj Lenczewski [this message]
2025-06-19 11:05   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 11:51     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 13:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 14:46         ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] iommu/arm: Add BBM Level 2 smmu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 11:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] arm64/mm: Elide tlbi in contpte_convert() under BBML2 Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 19:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 19:47     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-20 16:10     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-25 13:07       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-25 13:37         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-25 14:16           ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250619115155.GB20673@e133081.arm.com \
    --to=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).