From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, kpsingh@kernel.org,
mattbobrowski@google.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] kernfs: Add __kernfs_xattr_get for RCU protected access
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:33:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025061917-unrushed-overtake-e4ef@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619-kaulquappen-absagen-27377e154bc0@brauner>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:37:36PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Existing kernfs_xattr_get() locks iattr_mutex, so it cannot be used in
> > RCU critical sections. Introduce __kernfs_xattr_get(), which reads xattr
> > under RCU read lock. This can be used by BPF programs to access cgroupfs
> > xattrs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/kernfs/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/kernfs.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/inode.c b/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > index b83054da68b3..0ca231d2012c 100644
> > --- a/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > @@ -302,6 +302,20 @@ int kernfs_xattr_get(struct kernfs_node *kn, const char *name,
> > return simple_xattr_get(&attrs->xattrs, name, value, size);
> > }
> >
> > +int __kernfs_xattr_get(struct kernfs_node *kn, const char *name,
> > + void *value, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + struct kernfs_iattrs *attrs;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> > +
> > + attrs = rcu_dereference(kn->iattr);
> > + if (!attrs)
> > + return -ENODATA;
>
> Hm, that looks a bit silly. Which isn't your fault. I'm looking at the
> kernfs code that does the xattr allocations and I think that's the
> origin of the silliness. It uses a single global mutex for all kernfs
> users thus serializing all allocations for kernfs->iattr. That seems
> crazy but maybe I'm missing a good reason.
>
> I'm appending a patch to remove that mutex. @Greg, @Tejun, can you take
> a look whether that makes sense to you. Then I can take that patch and
> you can build yours on top of the series and I'll pick it all up in one
> go.
Looks sane to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 23:37 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Song Liu
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] kernfs: Add __kernfs_xattr_get for RCU protected access Song Liu
2025-06-19 10:01 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-19 10:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-06-19 15:33 ` Song Liu
2025-06-21 2:38 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-19 13:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr to read xattr of kernfs nodes Song Liu
2025-06-19 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Mark cgroup_subsys_state->cgroup RCU safe Song Liu
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Song Liu
2025-06-19 0:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Tejun Heo
2025-06-19 8:48 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-19 15:31 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025061917-unrushed-overtake-e4ef@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).