From: Onur <work@onurozkan.dev>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
longman@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org,
a.hindborg@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu,
dakr@kernel.org, thatslyude@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] implement `ww_mutex` abstraction for the Rust tree
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 17:33:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619173344.6c72c48a@nimda.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619141401.GI1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:14:01 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 05:06:56PM +0300, Onur Özkan wrote:
> > +bool rust_helper_ww_mutex_is_locked(struct ww_mutex *lock)
> > +{
> > + return ww_mutex_is_locked(lock);
> > +}
>
> Do we really need this? In general I dislike all the _is_locked()
> functions and would ideally like to remove them.
>
> Pretty much the only useful pattern for any of the _is_locked()
> functions is:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!foo_is_locked(&foo));
>
> Any other use is dodgy as heck.
>
>
It's an abstraction of `ww_mutex_is_locked`. Since this is an
abstraction module, as long as `ww_mutex_is_locked` exists I think
we should keep it. FWIW it's also quite useful for tests.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 14:06 [PATCH V3] implement `ww_mutex` abstraction for the Rust tree Onur Özkan
2025-06-19 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 14:33 ` Onur [this message]
2025-06-19 14:44 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-19 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 18:59 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 14:42 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-21 10:32 ` Onur
2025-06-19 14:43 ` Benno Lossin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250619173344.6c72c48a@nimda.home \
--to=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thatslyude@gmail.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).