linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order
@ 2025-06-19 12:27 ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-20 12:33   ` Hiago De Franco
  2025-06-23  9:34   ` Marek Szyprowski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2025-06-19 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Marek Szyprowski, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Aradhya Bhatia,
	Dmitry Baryshkov
  Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, Hiago De Franco, Francesco Dolcini,
	Tomi Valkeinen

The commit c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain
pre-enable and post-disable") changed the order of enable/disable calls.
Previously the calls (on imx8mm) were:

mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()

now the order is:

samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()

On imx8mm (possibly on imx8mp, and other platforms too) this causes two
issues:

1. The DSI PLL setup depends on a refclk, but the DSI driver does not
set the rate, just uses it with the rate it has. On imx8mm this refclk
seems to be related to the LCD controller's video clock. So, when the
mxsfb driver sets its video clock, DSI's refclk rate changes.

Earlier this mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable() set the video clock, so the PLL
refclk rate was set (and didn't change) in the DSI enable calls. Now the
rate changes between DSI's pre_enable() and enable(), but the driver
configures the PLL in the pre_enable().

Thus you get a black screen on a modeset. Doing the modeset again works,
as the video clock rate stays the same.

2. The image on the screen is shifted/wrapped horizontally. I have not
found the exact reason for this, but the documentation seems to hint
that the LCD controller's pixel stream should be enabled first, before
setting up the DSI. This would match the change, as now the pixel stream
starts only after DSI driver's pre_enable().

The main function related to this issue is samsung_dsim_init() which
will do the clock and link configuration. samsung_dsim_init() is
currently called from pre_enable(), but it is also called from
samsung_dsim_host_transfer() to set up the link if the peripheral driver
wants to send a DSI command.

This patch fixes both issues by moving the samsung_dsim_init() call from
pre_enable() to enable().

However, to deal with the case where the samsung_dsim_init() has already
been called from samsung_dsim_host_transfer() and the refclk rate has
changed, we need to make sure we re-initialize the DSI with the new rate
in enable(). This is achieved by clearing the DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED
flag and uninitializing the clocks and irqs before calling
samsung_dsim_init().

Fixes: c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable")
Reported-by: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
index f2f666b27d2d..cec383d8946d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
@@ -1473,22 +1473,31 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	}
 
 	dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
-
-	/*
-	 * For Exynos-DSIM the downstream bridge, or panel are expecting
-	 * the host initialization during DSI transfer.
-	 */
-	if (!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type)) {
-		ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
-		if (ret)
-			return;
-	}
 }
 
 static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 				       struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct samsung_dsim *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * The DSI bridge may have already been initialized in
+	 * samsung_dsim_host_transfer(). It is possible that the refclk rate has
+	 * changed after that due to the display controller configuration, and
+	 * thus we need to reinitialize the DSI bridge to ensure the correct
+	 * clock settings.
+	 */
+
+	if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED) {
+		dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED;
+		samsung_dsim_disable_clock(dsi);
+		samsung_dsim_disable_irq(dsi);
+	}
+
+	ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
 
 	samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
 	samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);

---
base-commit: 7872997c048e989c7689c2995d230fdca7798000
change-id: 20250619-samsung-dsim-fix-58c8ec8193e9

Best regards,
-- 
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order
  2025-06-19 12:27 ` [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order Tomi Valkeinen
@ 2025-06-20 12:33   ` Hiago De Franco
  2025-06-23  9:34   ` Marek Szyprowski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hiago De Franco @ 2025-06-20 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen
  Cc: Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Marek Szyprowski, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Aradhya Bhatia,
	Dmitry Baryshkov, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Francesco Dolcini,
	Hiago De Franco

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 03:27:18PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> The commit c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain
> pre-enable and post-disable") changed the order of enable/disable calls.
> Previously the calls (on imx8mm) were:
> 
> mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
> 
> now the order is:
> 
> samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
> 
> On imx8mm (possibly on imx8mp, and other platforms too) this causes two
> issues:
> 
> 1. The DSI PLL setup depends on a refclk, but the DSI driver does not
> set the rate, just uses it with the rate it has. On imx8mm this refclk
> seems to be related to the LCD controller's video clock. So, when the
> mxsfb driver sets its video clock, DSI's refclk rate changes.
> 
> Earlier this mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable() set the video clock, so the PLL
> refclk rate was set (and didn't change) in the DSI enable calls. Now the
> rate changes between DSI's pre_enable() and enable(), but the driver
> configures the PLL in the pre_enable().
> 
> Thus you get a black screen on a modeset. Doing the modeset again works,
> as the video clock rate stays the same.
> 
> 2. The image on the screen is shifted/wrapped horizontally. I have not
> found the exact reason for this, but the documentation seems to hint
> that the LCD controller's pixel stream should be enabled first, before
> setting up the DSI. This would match the change, as now the pixel stream
> starts only after DSI driver's pre_enable().
> 
> The main function related to this issue is samsung_dsim_init() which
> will do the clock and link configuration. samsung_dsim_init() is
> currently called from pre_enable(), but it is also called from
> samsung_dsim_host_transfer() to set up the link if the peripheral driver
> wants to send a DSI command.
> 
> This patch fixes both issues by moving the samsung_dsim_init() call from
> pre_enable() to enable().
> 
> However, to deal with the case where the samsung_dsim_init() has already
> been called from samsung_dsim_host_transfer() and the refclk rate has
> changed, we need to make sure we re-initialize the DSI with the new rate
> in enable(). This is achieved by clearing the DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED
> flag and uninitializing the clocks and irqs before calling
> samsung_dsim_init().
> 
> Fixes: c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable")
> Reported-by: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

Tested-by: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com> # Verdin iMX8MP

Best regards,
Hiago.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index f2f666b27d2d..cec383d8946d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -1473,22 +1473,31 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	}
>  
>  	dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * For Exynos-DSIM the downstream bridge, or panel are expecting
> -	 * the host initialization during DSI transfer.
> -	 */
> -	if (!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type)) {
> -		ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return;
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  				       struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct samsung_dsim *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The DSI bridge may have already been initialized in
> +	 * samsung_dsim_host_transfer(). It is possible that the refclk rate has
> +	 * changed after that due to the display controller configuration, and
> +	 * thus we need to reinitialize the DSI bridge to ensure the correct
> +	 * clock settings.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED) {
> +		dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED;
> +		samsung_dsim_disable_clock(dsi);
> +		samsung_dsim_disable_irq(dsi);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return;
>  
>  	samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
>  	samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 7872997c048e989c7689c2995d230fdca7798000
> change-id: 20250619-samsung-dsim-fix-58c8ec8193e9
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order
  2025-06-19 12:27 ` [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order Tomi Valkeinen
  2025-06-20 12:33   ` Hiago De Franco
@ 2025-06-23  9:34   ` Marek Szyprowski
  2025-06-23 10:02     ` Francesco Dolcini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-06-23  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen, Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Aradhya Bhatia,
	Dmitry Baryshkov
  Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, Hiago De Franco, Francesco Dolcini

On 19.06.2025 14:27, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> The commit c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain
> pre-enable and post-disable") changed the order of enable/disable calls.
> Previously the calls (on imx8mm) were:
>
> mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
>
> now the order is:
>
> samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
>
> On imx8mm (possibly on imx8mp, and other platforms too) this causes two
> issues:
>
> 1. The DSI PLL setup depends on a refclk, but the DSI driver does not
> set the rate, just uses it with the rate it has. On imx8mm this refclk
> seems to be related to the LCD controller's video clock. So, when the
> mxsfb driver sets its video clock, DSI's refclk rate changes.
>
> Earlier this mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable() set the video clock, so the PLL
> refclk rate was set (and didn't change) in the DSI enable calls. Now the
> rate changes between DSI's pre_enable() and enable(), but the driver
> configures the PLL in the pre_enable().
>
> Thus you get a black screen on a modeset. Doing the modeset again works,
> as the video clock rate stays the same.
>
> 2. The image on the screen is shifted/wrapped horizontally. I have not
> found the exact reason for this, but the documentation seems to hint
> that the LCD controller's pixel stream should be enabled first, before
> setting up the DSI. This would match the change, as now the pixel stream
> starts only after DSI driver's pre_enable().
>
> The main function related to this issue is samsung_dsim_init() which
> will do the clock and link configuration. samsung_dsim_init() is
> currently called from pre_enable(), but it is also called from
> samsung_dsim_host_transfer() to set up the link if the peripheral driver
> wants to send a DSI command.
>
> This patch fixes both issues by moving the samsung_dsim_init() call from
> pre_enable() to enable().
>
> However, to deal with the case where the samsung_dsim_init() has already
> been called from samsung_dsim_host_transfer() and the refclk rate has
> changed, we need to make sure we re-initialize the DSI with the new rate
> in enable(). This is achieved by clearing the DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED
> flag and uninitializing the clocks and irqs before calling
> samsung_dsim_init().
>
> Fixes: c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable")
> Reported-by: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

Seems to be working fine on all my Exynos based boards:

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>


BTW, it was a long discussion how to handle the dsim initialization and 
we agreed to keep calling samsung_dsim_init() on first dsi transfer for 
Exynos case and from pre-enable for others:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221209152343.180139-11-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/

I'm not sure if changing this won't break again something, especially 
the boards with DSI bridge or panel controlled via I2C instead of the 
DSI commands. This has to be tested on the all supported variants of 
this hardware.


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index f2f666b27d2d..cec383d8946d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -1473,22 +1473,31 @@ static void samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   	}
>   
>   	dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_ENABLED;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * For Exynos-DSIM the downstream bridge, or panel are expecting
> -	 * the host initialization during DSI transfer.
> -	 */
> -	if (!samsung_dsim_hw_is_exynos(dsi->plat_data->hw_type)) {
> -		ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return;
> -	}
>   }
>   
>   static void samsung_dsim_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   				       struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>   {
>   	struct samsung_dsim *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The DSI bridge may have already been initialized in
> +	 * samsung_dsim_host_transfer(). It is possible that the refclk rate has
> +	 * changed after that due to the display controller configuration, and
> +	 * thus we need to reinitialize the DSI bridge to ensure the correct
> +	 * clock settings.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED) {
> +		dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED;
> +		samsung_dsim_disable_clock(dsi);
> +		samsung_dsim_disable_irq(dsi);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = samsung_dsim_init(dsi);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return;
>   
>   	samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(dsi);
>   	samsung_dsim_set_display_enable(dsi, true);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 7872997c048e989c7689c2995d230fdca7798000
> change-id: 20250619-samsung-dsim-fix-58c8ec8193e9
>
> Best regards,

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order
  2025-06-23  9:34   ` Marek Szyprowski
@ 2025-06-23 10:02     ` Francesco Dolcini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Dolcini @ 2025-06-23 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Szyprowski
  Cc: Tomi Valkeinen, Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
	Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Aradhya Bhatia,
	Dmitry Baryshkov, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Hiago De Franco,
	Francesco Dolcini

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:34:34AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 19.06.2025 14:27, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > The commit c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain
> > pre-enable and post-disable") changed the order of enable/disable calls.
> > Previously the calls (on imx8mm) were:
> >
> > mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> > samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> > samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
> >
> > now the order is:
> >
> > samsung_dsim_atomic_pre_enable()
> > mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable()
> > samsung_dsim_atomic_enable()
> >
> > On imx8mm (possibly on imx8mp, and other platforms too) this causes two
> > issues:
> >
> > 1. The DSI PLL setup depends on a refclk, but the DSI driver does not
> > set the rate, just uses it with the rate it has. On imx8mm this refclk
> > seems to be related to the LCD controller's video clock. So, when the
> > mxsfb driver sets its video clock, DSI's refclk rate changes.
> >
> > Earlier this mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable() set the video clock, so the PLL
> > refclk rate was set (and didn't change) in the DSI enable calls. Now the
> > rate changes between DSI's pre_enable() and enable(), but the driver
> > configures the PLL in the pre_enable().
> >
> > Thus you get a black screen on a modeset. Doing the modeset again works,
> > as the video clock rate stays the same.
> >
> > 2. The image on the screen is shifted/wrapped horizontally. I have not
> > found the exact reason for this, but the documentation seems to hint
> > that the LCD controller's pixel stream should be enabled first, before
> > setting up the DSI. This would match the change, as now the pixel stream
> > starts only after DSI driver's pre_enable().
> >
> > The main function related to this issue is samsung_dsim_init() which
> > will do the clock and link configuration. samsung_dsim_init() is
> > currently called from pre_enable(), but it is also called from
> > samsung_dsim_host_transfer() to set up the link if the peripheral driver
> > wants to send a DSI command.
> >
> > This patch fixes both issues by moving the samsung_dsim_init() call from
> > pre_enable() to enable().
> >
> > However, to deal with the case where the samsung_dsim_init() has already
> > been called from samsung_dsim_host_transfer() and the refclk rate has
> > changed, we need to make sure we re-initialize the DSI with the new rate
> > in enable(). This is achieved by clearing the DSIM_STATE_INITIALIZED
> > flag and uninitializing the clocks and irqs before calling
> > samsung_dsim_init().
> >
> > Fixes: c9b1150a68d9 ("drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable")
> > Reported-by: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> Seems to be working fine on all my Exynos based boards:
> 
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> 
> 
> BTW, it was a long discussion how to handle the dsim initialization and 
> we agreed to keep calling samsung_dsim_init() on first dsi transfer for 
> Exynos case and from pre-enable for others:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221209152343.180139-11-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/
> 
> I'm not sure if changing this won't break again something, especially 
> the boards with DSI bridge or panel controlled via I2C instead of the 
> DSI commands. This has to be tested on the all supported variants of 
> this hardware.

FWIW, DSI bridges (LT8912B and SN65DSI83) controlled over I2C were
tested fine with this patch on both NXP i.MX8MP and 8MM (see Hiago
tested-by).


Francesco


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-23 10:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CGME20250619122746eucas1p149ff73e78cb82dc06c19960a2bbd3d89@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2025-06-19 12:27 ` [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix init order Tomi Valkeinen
2025-06-20 12:33   ` Hiago De Franco
2025-06-23  9:34   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-23 10:02     ` Francesco Dolcini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).