From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
gustavold@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: add netpoll basic functionality test
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:38:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250624093824.4c0dd380@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFq1z0BS6RCUCNwa@gmail.com>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:27:27 +0100 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > + try:
> > > + for key, value in config_data.items():
> > > + if DEBUG:
> > > + ksft_pr(f"Setting {key} to {value}")
> > > + with open(
> > > + f"{NETCONSOLE_CONFIGFS_PATH}/{target_name}/{key}",
> >
> > Could be personal preference but I think that using temp variable to
> > store the argument looks better than breaking out the function call
> > over 5 lines..
>
> I was not able to get what you mean here, sorry.
>
> We have config_data, which is a dictionary that stores the netconsole
> keys (as in configfs) and their value, which will be set in the code below.
>
> What would this temp variable look like, and how it would look like?
path = f"{NETCONSOLE_CONFIGFS_PATH}/{target_name}/{key}"
with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
...
> > > +def test_netpoll(cfg: NetDrvEpEnv, netdevnl: NetdevFamily) -> None:
> > > + """
> > > + Test netpoll by sending traffic to the interface and then sending
> > > + netconsole messages to trigger a poll
> > > + """
> > > +
> > > + target_name = generate_random_netcons_name()
> > > + ifname = cfg.dev["ifname"]
> > > + traffic = None
> > > +
> > > + try:
> > > + set_single_rx_tx_queue(ifname)
> > > + traffic = GenerateTraffic(cfg)
> > > + check_traffic_flowing(cfg, netdevnl)
> >
> > Any reason to perform this check? GenerateTraffic() already waits for
> > traffic to ramp up. Do we need to adjust the logic there, or make some
> > methods public?
>
> Not really. I can just remove this code, in fact, given
> GenerateTraffic() already waits for the code. Or, I can add under DEBUG.
Let's not put functional changes under DEBUG, just prints.
It could make it so that the test fails without DEBUG and passes with.
> As we discussed in the RFC thread, I will add support for bpftrace in
> the v2.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 9:38 [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: add netpoll basic functionality test Breno Leitao
2025-06-24 1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-24 14:27 ` Breno Leitao
2025-06-24 16:38 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250624093824.4c0dd380@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).