From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology()
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:45:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625034552.42365-2-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625034552.42365-1-me@linux.beauty>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The #ifdeffery and the initializers in build_sched_topology() are just
disgusting. The SCHED_SMT #ifdef is also pointless because SCHED_SMT is
unconditionally enabled when SMP is enabled.
Statically initialize the domain levels in the topology array and let
build_sched_topology() invalidate the package domain level when NUMA in
package is available.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 45 +++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index fc78c2325fd29..7d202f9785362 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -478,43 +478,32 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
*/
static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[6];
+#define DOMAIN(maskfn, flagsfn, dname) { .mask = maskfn, .sd_flags = flagsfn, .name = #dname }
-static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
-{
- int i = 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
- x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
- };
-#endif
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
+ DOMAIN(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
- x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CLS)
- };
+ DOMAIN(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
- x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC)
- };
+ DOMAIN(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC),
#endif
- /*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
- * since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
- * domains based on the SLIT.
- */
- if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
- x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
- cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
- };
- }
+ DOMAIN(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG),
+ { NULL },
+};
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
+{
/*
- * There must be one trailing NULL entry left.
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
+ * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
+ * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
*/
- BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology)-1);
+ if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+ unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
+ memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
+ }
set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 3:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-06-25 3:45 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-06-25 8:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30 0:21 ` Li Chen
2025-06-30 12:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-25 3:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-06-25 5:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30 0:39 ` Li Chen
2025-06-25 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30 0:29 ` Li Chen
2025-06-25 5:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625034552.42365-2-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox