public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology()
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:45:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625034552.42365-2-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625034552.42365-1-me@linux.beauty>

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The #ifdeffery and the initializers in build_sched_topology() are just
disgusting. The SCHED_SMT #ifdef is also pointless because SCHED_SMT is
unconditionally enabled when SMP is enabled.

Statically initialize the domain levels in the topology array and let
build_sched_topology() invalidate the package domain level when NUMA in
package is available.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 45 +++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index fc78c2325fd29..7d202f9785362 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -478,43 +478,32 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
  */
 static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
 
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[6];
+#define DOMAIN(maskfn, flagsfn, dname) { .mask = maskfn, .sd_flags = flagsfn, .name = #dname }
 
-static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-	x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
-		cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
-	};
-#endif
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
+	DOMAIN(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
-	x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
-		cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CLS)
-	};
+	DOMAIN(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS),
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
-	x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
-		cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC)
-	};
+	DOMAIN(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC),
 #endif
-	/*
-	 * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
-	 * since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
-	 * domains based on the SLIT.
-	 */
-	if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
-		x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
-			cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(PKG)
-		};
-	}
+	DOMAIN(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG),
+	{ NULL },
+};
 
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
+{
 	/*
-	 * There must be one trailing NULL entry left.
+	 * When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
+	 * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
+	 * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology)-1);
+	if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+		unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
 
+		memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
+	}
 	set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  3:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-06-25  3:45 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-06-25  8:28   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30  0:21     ` Li Chen
2025-06-30 12:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-25  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-06-25  5:45   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25  8:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30  0:39     ` Li Chen
2025-06-25  8:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-30  0:29     ` Li Chen
2025-06-25  5:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250625034552.42365-2-me@linux.beauty \
    --to=me@linux.beauty \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox