From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Ben Copeland <ben.copeland@linaro.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
<regressions@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<sagi@grimberg.me>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion after 06cae0e3f61c
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:58:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701155810.GE6278@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701132936.GA18807@lst.de>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 03:29:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:25:23PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I think the PRP handling is broken. At the very least, handling the last
> > element is wrong if it appears at the end of the list, so I think we
> > need something like this:
>
> Yeah.
>
> > But even that, the PRP setup doesn't match the teardown. We're calling
> > dma_map_page() on each PRP even if consecutive PRP's came from the same
> > dma mapping segment. So even if it had been coalesced, but if the device
> > doesn't support SGLs, then it would use the prp unmap path.
>
> Yes, that's broken, and I remember fixing it before. A little digging
> shows that my fixes disappeared between the oct 30 version of Leon's
> dma-split branch and the latest one somewhere.
Oct, 30 belongs to RFC/first version of patches.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250630075218epcas5p1f3d467fffa468cac0ccd012c193e94df@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-06-30 7:50 ` next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion after 06cae0e3f61c Ben Copeland
2025-06-30 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-30 19:51 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-01 19:43 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-30 20:25 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 0:54 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 13:05 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-01 14:20 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-01 15:58 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-07-01 21:00 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-03 9:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:29 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-03 15:13 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-03 5:54 ` Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701155810.GE6278@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ben.copeland@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox