From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] rcutorture: Remove SRCU-lite scenarios
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:23:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702002330.1074433-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2994ade2-bd06-4ba7-bcc9-be4d0d15ea0c@paulmck-laptop>
This commit prepares for the removal of SRCU-Lite by removing the SRCU-L
rcutorture scenario that tests it.
Both SRCU-lite and SRCU-fast provide faster readers by dropping the
smp_mb() call from their lock and unlock primitives, but incur a pair
of added RCU grace periods during the SRCU grace period. There is a
trivial mapping from the SRCU-lite API to that of SRCU-fast, so there
should be no transition issues.
[ paulmck: Apply Christoph Hellwig feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST | 1 -
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L | 10 ----------
.../selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L.boot | 3 ---
3 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L.boot
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST
index 45f572570a8c3..98b6175e5aa09 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ TREE04
TREE05
TREE07
TREE09
-SRCU-L
SRCU-N
SRCU-P
SRCU-T
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b4fa8dbef8a9..0000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=n
-CONFIG_SMP=y
-CONFIG_NR_CPUS=6
-CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
-CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
-CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n
-CONFIG_PREEMPT=n
-#CHECK#CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=n
-CONFIG_KPROBES=n
-CONFIG_FTRACE=n
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L.boot
deleted file mode 100644
index 0207b3138c5be..0000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/SRCU-L.boot
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-rcutorture.torture_type=srcu
-rcutorture.reader_flavor=0x4
-rcutorture.fwd_progress=3
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 16:13 [PATCH 0/5] Remove SRCU-lite in favor of SRCU-fast Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-24 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] rcutorture: Remove SRCU-lite scenarios Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-24 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcutorture: Remove support for SRCU-lite Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-24 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] srcu: Remove SRCU-lite implementation Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-24 16:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] checkpatch: Remove SRCU-lite deprecation Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <20250624161400.867880-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
2025-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-26 10:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-26 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-26 14:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-02 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove SRCU-lite in favor of SRCU-fast Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-02 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-02 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-07-02 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] srcu: Remove SRCU-lite implementation Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-02 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] checkpatch: Remove SRCU-lite deprecation Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702002330.1074433-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).