From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, clm@meta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] sched: Change ttwu_runnable() vs sched_delayed
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:49:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702121159.535226098@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250702114924.091581796@infradead.org
Change how TTWU handles sched_delayed tasks.
Currently sched_delayed tasks are seen as on_rq and will hit
ttwu_runnable(), which treats sched_delayed tasks the same as other
on_rq tasks, it makes them runnable on the runqueue they're on.
However, tasks that were dequeued (and not delayed) will get a
different wake-up path, notably they will pass through wakeup
balancing.
Change ttwu_runnable() to dequeue delayed tasks and report it isn't
on_rq after all, ensuring the task continues down the regular wakeup
path.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3793,8 +3793,10 @@ static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_str
return 0;
update_rq_clock(rq);
- if (p->se.sched_delayed)
- enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_DELAYED);
+ if (p->se.sched_delayed) {
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK | DEQUEUE_DELAYED | DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ return 0;
+ }
if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
/*
* When on_rq && !on_cpu the task is preempted, see if
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 11:49 [PATCH v2 00/12] sched: Address schbench regression Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] sched/psi: Optimize psi_group_change() cpu_clock() usage Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-15 19:11 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-16 6:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-16 6:53 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-16 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 14:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-07-16 16:27 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-23 4:16 ` Aithal, Srikanth
2025-07-25 5:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-02 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2025-07-10 12:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 22:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] " Mel Gorman
2025-07-15 14:55 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-16 18:19 ` Mel Gorman
2025-07-30 9:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-07-30 9:46 ` Juri Lelli
2025-07-30 10:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-08-05 22:03 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-08-05 23:04 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] sched: Optimize ttwu() / select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 16:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-14 22:59 ` Mel Gorman
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] sched: Use lock guard in ttwu_runnable() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 16:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-14 23:00 ` Mel Gorman
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] sched: Add ttwu_queue controls Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 16:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-14 23:14 ` Mel Gorman
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] sched: Introduce ttwu_do_migrate() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 16:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] psi: Split psi_ttwu_dequeue() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-17 23:59 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-18 18:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched: Re-arrange __ttwu_queue_wakelist() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] sched: Clean up ttwu comments Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] sched: Use lock guard in sched_ttwu_pending() Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 16:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-07-02 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] sched: Add ttwu_queue support for delayed tasks Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 16:00 ` Phil Auld
2025-07-03 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 17:11 ` Phil Auld
2025-07-14 13:57 ` Phil Auld
2025-07-04 6:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-04 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-08 12:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-07-08 18:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-08 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-23 5:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-02 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] sched: Address schbench regression Chris Mason
2025-07-07 9:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-07 9:38 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-16 13:46 ` Phil Auld
2025-07-17 17:25 ` Phil Auld
2025-07-07 18:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-08 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-09 16:46 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-14 17:54 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-21 19:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-22 20:20 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-24 18:23 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-08 15:09 ` Chris Mason
2025-07-08 17:29 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-17 13:04 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-17 16:57 ` Beata Michalska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702121159.535226098@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).