From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dw@davidwei.uk, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netdevsim: implement peer queue flow control
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 14:07:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702140712.55570adf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701-netdev_flow_control-v1-1-240329fc91b1@debian.org>
On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 11:10:56 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> +static void nsim_wake_queue(struct net_device *net, struct netdev_queue *txq, void *unused)
> +{
> + if (!(netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)))
> + return;
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> +}
> +
> +static void nsim_wake_all_queues(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *peer_dev)
> +{
> + netdev_for_each_tx_queue(peer_dev, nsim_wake_queue, NULL);
> + netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, nsim_wake_queue, NULL);
I think you can use netif_tx_wake_all_queues() directly in the caller
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t unlink_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct netdevsim *nsim, *peer;
> @@ -367,6 +380,9 @@ static ssize_t unlink_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf,
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(nsim->peer, NULL);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(peer->peer, NULL);
>
> + synchronize_net();
> + nsim_wake_all_queues(dev, peer->netdev);
> +
> out_put_netns:
> put_net(ns);
> rtnl_unlock();
> -static int nsim_napi_rx(struct nsim_rq *rq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static void nsim_start_peer_tx_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct nsim_rq *rq)
> +{
> + struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct net_device *peer_dev;
> + struct netdevsim *peer_ns;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + u16 idx;
> +
> + idx = rq->napi.index;
> + peer_ns = rcu_dereference(ns->peer);
> + if (!peer_ns)
> + return;
> +
> + /* TX device */
> + peer_dev = peer_ns->netdev;
> +
> + if (dev->real_num_tx_queues != peer_dev->num_rx_queues)
> + return;
> +
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(peer_dev, idx);
> + if (!(netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)))
> + return;
> +
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> +}
> +
> +static void nsim_stop_peer_tx_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct nsim_rq *rq,
> + u16 idx)
> +{
> + struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct net_device *peer_dev;
> + struct netdevsim *peer_ns;
> +
> + peer_ns = rcu_dereference(ns->peer);
> + if (!peer_ns)
> + return;
> +
> + /* TX device */
> + peer_dev = peer_ns->netdev;
For the wake we need to find the peer, that's true. But stop happens in
the Tx path IOW we're coming from nsim_start_xmit() which had the
right Tx device already, right? The peer we'll get here was the original
dev that was padded to nsim_start_xmit(), we just need to pass it into
nsim_napi_rx().
> + /* If different queues size, do not stop, since it is not
> + * easy to find which TX queue is mapped here
> + */
> + if (dev->real_num_tx_queues != peer_dev->num_rx_queues)
> + return;
> +
> + netif_subqueue_try_stop(peer_dev, idx,
> + NSIM_RING_SIZE - skb_queue_len(&rq->skb_queue),
> + NSIM_RING_SIZE / 2);
> +}
> +
> +static int nsim_napi_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct nsim_rq *rq,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (skb_queue_len(&rq->skb_queue) > NSIM_RING_SIZE) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + nsim_stop_peer_tx_queue(dev, rq, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> return NET_RX_DROP;
> }
> @@ -51,7 +106,7 @@ static int nsim_napi_rx(struct nsim_rq *rq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> static int nsim_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct nsim_rq *rq)
> {
> - return __dev_forward_skb(dev, skb) ?: nsim_napi_rx(rq, skb);
> + return __dev_forward_skb(dev, skb) ?: nsim_napi_rx(dev, rq, skb);
> }
>
> static netdev_tx_t nsim_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> @@ -351,6 +406,9 @@ static int nsim_rcv(struct nsim_rq *rq, int budget)
> dev_dstats_rx_dropped(dev);
> }
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + nsim_start_peer_tx_queue(dev, rq);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return i;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: f6e98f17ad6829c48573952ede3f52ed00c1377f
> change-id: 20250630-netdev_flow_control-2b2d37965377
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 18:10 [PATCH net-next] netdevsim: implement peer queue flow control Breno Leitao
2025-07-01 22:26 ` David Wei
2025-07-02 8:12 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-02 21:07 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702140712.55570adf@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox