From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/10] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250704-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v4-4-9289d8758243@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250704-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v4-0-9289d8758243@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
We don't use any fields from struct device in gpio_sysfs_request_irq(),
gpio_sysfs_free_irq() and gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(). We only use the
dev argument to get the associated struct gpiod_data pointer with
dev_get_drvdata().
To make the transition to not using dev_get_drvdata() across line
callbacks for sysfs attributes easier, pass gpiod_data directly to
these functions instead of having it wrapped in struct device.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 39e9ca31f034e20abd08fb5e9b4eecf24f127d5e..0cfa73e92b47fd089b973e96b5062694b7f8abd3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -162,9 +162,8 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_sysfs_irq(int irq, void *priv)
}
/* Caller holds gpiod-data mutex. */
-static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned char flags)
+static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct gpiod_data *data, unsigned char flags)
{
- struct gpiod_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct gpio_desc *desc = data->desc;
unsigned long irq_flags;
int ret;
@@ -223,9 +222,8 @@ static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned char flags)
* Caller holds gpiod-data mutex (unless called after class-device
* deregistration).
*/
-static void gpio_sysfs_free_irq(struct device *dev)
+static void gpio_sysfs_free_irq(struct gpiod_data *data)
{
- struct gpiod_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct gpio_desc *desc = data->desc;
CLASS(gpio_chip_guard, guard)(desc);
@@ -278,12 +276,12 @@ static ssize_t edge_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
return size;
if (data->irq_flags)
- gpio_sysfs_free_irq(dev);
+ gpio_sysfs_free_irq(data);
if (!flags)
return size;
- status = gpio_sysfs_request_irq(dev, flags);
+ status = gpio_sysfs_request_irq(data, flags);
if (status)
return status;
@@ -294,9 +292,8 @@ static ssize_t edge_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(edge);
/* Caller holds gpiod-data mutex. */
-static int gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(struct device *dev, int value)
+static int gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(struct gpiod_data *data, int value)
{
- struct gpiod_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned int flags = data->irq_flags;
struct gpio_desc *desc = data->desc;
int status = 0;
@@ -309,8 +306,8 @@ static int gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(struct device *dev, int value)
/* reconfigure poll(2) support if enabled on one edge only */
if (flags == GPIO_IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING ||
flags == GPIO_IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING) {
- gpio_sysfs_free_irq(dev);
- status = gpio_sysfs_request_irq(dev, flags);
+ gpio_sysfs_free_irq(data);
+ status = gpio_sysfs_request_irq(data, flags);
}
gpiod_line_state_notify(desc, GPIO_V2_LINE_CHANGED_CONFIG);
@@ -345,7 +342,7 @@ static ssize_t active_low_store(struct device *dev,
guard(mutex)(&data->mutex);
- return gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(dev, value) ?: size;
+ return gpio_sysfs_set_active_low(data, value) ?: size;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(active_low);
@@ -814,7 +811,7 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
* edge_store.
*/
if (data->irq_flags)
- gpio_sysfs_free_irq(dev);
+ gpio_sysfs_free_irq(data);
}
put_device(dev);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-04 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 12:58 [PATCH v4 00/10] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] gpio: sysfs: use gpiod_is_equal() to compare GPIO descriptors Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-04 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-13 8:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-14 1:38 ` Kent Gibson
2025-07-16 8:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-07-16 12:45 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-07-16 8:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250704-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v4-4-9289d8758243@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).