From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com (out-188.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F7A2E54B5 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 13:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752067426; cv=none; b=gODU3uKEG/4gVtf/IyCEvVrDLKT71mkzUPZpFc+MiaJUzM3A11UAEGL1M4FzMfVgNKKbG8FkfBlGSkx5wiu5cJkkR3X0h9hUwExGskvt9+G4LpRQ5E3/I2P5ICSw6BypEM3cfVb7969xSVYBZbDL+siexXg5IlQckPbpLYkVOAQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752067426; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S2JBHxE2A0fF5iG6RyVzhdwcE1CqCzzD/2/R8qpHEAA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=AAOuFmmSHRv2GjISZ0KBRP8+TZeMHjKNTEaf//RIDrwGH/3jH7dzFkQy0CAb44SWEJ4/t7t3T3gSrXcrxdrftRU5aB32LNY54oZgH/nN+LIjFs4aSEobJnHdYvyVk7UGOL3fQ4xyjDraD3zHEM9EumqiWbFsrA6t1wf0RXJnsho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=xmn443zN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="xmn443zN" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1752067411; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h3oB83QFgAXtjWOjOKu/2nsCUQVsRZtax03o5JAM6Y8=; b=xmn443zN8ZCqi+yE0svYjy3EEAA/aL5PrNO+deNCU4758v55UA1ZIGh2qzcJDL6VwXCYuQ 7Cg73xcyw68fomcZXRgcV/1tHzS8jwhbSn/L8yw9IqISeMngjRo4dbwDCwIm/vyqQw1Ikh 5OjIghyN/8GXcP0LCmco4LiJjC0ofu2LWkgLgb7vkomlE4krN+mxwE257oEVjBCTJ0sIqJ dhzCK3XfNcj3AdAZaHjMd/duHBDxdeIzgnpk13qA3lMimKlydMg9XjCnQVbWLTAMHXSZDk xtQHNDL+lQp1yTQv/HaIT2z2LrpA/bYiS/U4crmLUrJafCGviL+zkOyZXCKuVw== From: Diederik de Haas To: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner Cc: Dragan Simic , Quentin Schulz , Johan Jonker , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Diederik de Haas Subject: [PATCH v4 00/10] rockchip: Fix several DTB validation issues Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:15:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20250709132323.128757-1-didi.debian@cknow.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT This patch set fixes several DTB validation issues and consists of 2 parts: 1) dsi refactoring 2) various low-hanging fruit ad 1) The display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml binding had: - #address-cells - #size-cells My guess is that those properties were added for panel(s) which could be connected. While convenient, it caused DTB validation issues when a panel was not defined on a board. So add the #address/#size-cells properties to the board dts[i] file where there is a panel and then remove the properties from the SoC dtsi file. Also remove the properties from this binding as they were already defined in "dsi-controller.yaml". ad 2) There were a number of issues which were obvious to me how to fix, so I fixed those as well. One of those was the addition of port(s) or endpoints, but for that the context (ie parent nodes) got redefined ... to the same values they had in the SoC dsi node. The SoC dsi node already defined the structure where each port got a label/phandle. That allows for a simplification of the port/endpoint by referencing that label/phandle. My changes were based Heiko's v6.17-armsoc/dts64 branch at commit 7f9509791507 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add DTs for Firefly ROC-RK3588S-PC") Then applied the following patches: 86491c2b99e5 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions") 6f446bbe412a ("dt-bindings: gpu: mali-utgard: Add Rockchip RK3528 compatible") ab9be0b75af5 ("dt-bindings: display: himax-hx8394: Add Huiling hl055fhav028c") 8358102806c6 ("dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add support for RK3528") 233eda069994 ("dt-bindings: rockchip: pmu: Add compatible for RK3528") And then validated it with W=1 using dtschema-2025.6.1. The validation log file sizes: - base: 99.9 KiB - dsi: 82.2 KiB - low-hanging-fruit: 69.0 KiB I then checked whether dmesg wouldn't indicate problem on these boards: - Rock64 (rk3328) - RockPro64 (rk3399) - PineTab2 (rk3566) And I didn't find any. I don't have any px30 or rk3399-gru-* based boards, so I couldn't test with those. Changes in v2: - Move refactoring of port/endpoint definition to its own patch (Quentin) - Move re-ordering of nodes to its own patch (Quentin) Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250627152645.740981-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/ Changes in v3: - Fix syntax error in RP64 screen dtso (kernel test robot) Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250628144915.839338-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/ Changes in v4: - Fix commit message in patch 3 wrt dt-bindings (Rob) Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250629123840.34948-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/ Cheers, Diederik Diederik de Haas (10): arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to px30 boards arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to rk3399 boards dt-bindings: display: rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi: Drop address/size cells arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify VOP port definition on rk3328 arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify edp endpoints on several rk3399 boards arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify mipi_out endpoint on rk3399 RP64 dtso arm64: dts: rockchip: Move mipi_out node on rk3399 haikou demo dtso arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix LCD panel port on rk3566-pinetab2 arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop unneeded address+size-cells on px30 arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop regulator-compatible property on rk3399 .../rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml | 6 ----- .../rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts | 2 ++ .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts | 2 ++ .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts | 2 ++ .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts | 2 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts | 2 ++ .../rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts | 2 ++ .../dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts | 2 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 6 ----- .../dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi | 2 ++ .../dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts | 2 ++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi | 2 ++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 6 +---- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi | 4 ---- .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi | 15 ++++--------- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi | 4 +++- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts | 2 -- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts | 15 ++++--------- .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts | 2 ++ .../rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso | 12 +++++----- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts | 2 -- .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso | 22 ++++++------------- .../rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts | 16 ++++---------- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi | 6 ++--- 24 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) -- 2.50.0