linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	aik@amd.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	yilun.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:33:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711213323.GH1951027@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHEnnesvLL5te5rf@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:02:53PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > With one nit:
> > 
> > > -	while (!xa_empty(&ictx->objects)) {
> > > +	for (;;) {

Actually just leave this, if xa_empty does work out then the loop
exits quickly, otherwise the break will deal with the tombstones
 it.

> > >  		unsigned int destroyed = 0;
> > >  		unsigned long index;
> > > +		bool empty = true;
> > >  
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * xa_for_each() will not return tomestones (zeroed entries),
> > > +		 * which prevent the xarray being empty. So use an empty flags
> > 
> > Since the first "empty" and the second "empty" are different things,
> > 
> > > +		 * instead of xa_empty() to indicate all entries are either
> > > +		 * NULLed or tomestoned.
> > > +		 */
> > 
> > let's write something like this (correcting typos too):
> > 
> > 		/*
> > 		 * We can't use xa_empty(), as a tombstone (NULLed entry) would
>                                                             ^
> > 		 * prevent it returning true, unlike xa_for_each() ignoring the
> > 		 * NULLed entries. So use an empty flag instead of xa_empty() to
>                    ^
> s/NULLed/zeroed, are they?

Maybe:

 We can't use xa_empty() to end the loop as the tombstones are stored
 as XA_ZERO_ENTRY in the xarray. However xa_for_each() automatically
 converts them to NULL and skips them causing xa_empty() to be kept
 false. Thus once xa_for_each() finds no further !NULL entries the
 loop is done.

?

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-09  4:02 [PATCH v4 0/7] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iommufd/viommu: Roll back to use iommufd_object_alloc() for vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  7:32   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 18:26   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  7:35   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 19:08   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 15:02     ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 19:39       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 21:33       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-11 22:04         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 17:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iommufd: Add a pre_destroy() op for objects Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  7:40   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 17:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11  3:16       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-11  9:38         ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 22:09   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  8:03   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12  2:22   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-12 17:47     ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-14 16:40       ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-14 16:53         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-14 17:34           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 18:03             ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-12  2:26   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  8:04   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12  2:27   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  8:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12  2:39   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09  4:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
2025-07-10  8:10   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10  9:25     ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11  3:12       ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250711213323.GH1951027@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).