linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 25/26] ipv6: Switch to higher-level SHA-1 functions
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 16:23:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250712232329.818226-26-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250712232329.818226-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

There's now a proper SHA-1 API that follows the usual conventions for
hash function APIs: sha1_init(), sha1_update(), sha1_final(), sha1().
The only remaining user of the older low-level SHA-1 API,
sha1_init_raw() and sha1_transform(), is ipv6_generate_stable_address().
I'd like to remove this older API, which is too low-level.

Unfortunately, ipv6_generate_stable_address() does in fact skip the
SHA-1 finalization for some reason.  So the values it computes are not
standard SHA-1 values, and it sort of does want the low-level API.

Still, it's still possible to use the higher-level functions sha1_init()
and sha1_update() to get the same result, provided that the resulting
state is used directly, skipping sha1_final().

So, let's do that instead.  This will allow removing the low-level API.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index d0e5b94c10af4..a4d47044f4557 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -3336,12 +3336,11 @@ static bool ipv6_reserved_interfaceid(struct in6_addr address)
 static int ipv6_generate_stable_address(struct in6_addr *address,
 					u8 dad_count,
 					const struct inet6_dev *idev)
 {
 	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
-	static __u32 digest[SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS];
-	static __u32 workspace[SHA1_WORKSPACE_WORDS];
+	static struct sha1_ctx sha_ctx;
 
 	static union {
 		char __data[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE];
 		struct {
 			struct in6_addr secret;
@@ -3353,36 +3352,40 @@ static int ipv6_generate_stable_address(struct in6_addr *address,
 
 	struct in6_addr secret;
 	struct in6_addr temp;
 	struct net *net = dev_net(idev->dev);
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(data.__data) != sizeof(data));
-
 	if (idev->cnf.stable_secret.initialized)
 		secret = idev->cnf.stable_secret.secret;
 	else if (net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->stable_secret.initialized)
 		secret = net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->stable_secret.secret;
 	else
 		return -1;
 
 retry:
 	spin_lock_bh(&lock);
 
-	sha1_init_raw(digest);
+	sha1_init(&sha_ctx);
+
 	memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
-	memset(workspace, 0, sizeof(workspace));
 	memcpy(data.hwaddr, idev->dev->perm_addr, idev->dev->addr_len);
 	data.prefix[0] = address->s6_addr32[0];
 	data.prefix[1] = address->s6_addr32[1];
 	data.secret = secret;
 	data.dad_count = dad_count;
+	sha1_update(&sha_ctx, (const u8 *)&data, sizeof(data));
 
-	sha1_transform(digest, data.__data, workspace);
-
+	/*
+	 * Note that the SHA-1 finalization is omitted here, and the digest is
+	 * pulled directly from the internal SHA-1 state (making it incompatible
+	 * with standard SHA-1).  Unusual, but technically okay since the data
+	 * length is fixed and is a multiple of the SHA-1 block size.
+	 */
+	static_assert(sizeof(data) % SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE == 0);
 	temp = *address;
-	temp.s6_addr32[2] = (__force __be32)digest[0];
-	temp.s6_addr32[3] = (__force __be32)digest[1];
+	temp.s6_addr32[2] = (__force __be32)sha_ctx.state.h[0];
+	temp.s6_addr32[3] = (__force __be32)sha_ctx.state.h[1];
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&lock);
 
 	if (ipv6_reserved_interfaceid(temp)) {
 		dad_count++;
-- 
2.50.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-12 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-12 23:22 [PATCH 00/26] SHA-1 library functions Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 01/26] crypto: x86/sha1 - Rename conflicting symbol Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 02/26] lib/crypto: sha1: Rename sha1_init() to sha1_init_raw() Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 03/26] lib/crypto: sha1: Add SHA-1 library functions Eric Biggers
2025-07-13 15:05   ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2025-07-13 16:54     ` Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 04/26] lib/crypto: sha1: Add HMAC support Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 05/26] crypto: sha1 - Wrap library and add " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 06/26] crypto: sha1 - Use same state format as legacy drivers Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 07/26] lib/crypto: arm/sha1: Migrate optimized code into library Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:22 ` [PATCH 08/26] lib/crypto: arm64/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 09/26] lib/crypto: mips/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 10/26] lib/crypto: powerpc/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 11/26] lib/crypto: s390/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 12/26] lib/crypto: sparc/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 13/26] lib/crypto: x86/sha1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 14/26] crypto: sha1 - Remove sha1_base.h Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 15/26] lib/crypto: tests: Add KUnit tests for SHA-1 and HMAC-SHA1 Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 16/26] bpf: Use sha1() instead of sha1_transform() in bpf_prog_calc_tag() Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 17/26] sctp: Use HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-SHA256 library functions Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 18/26] ipv6: sr: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 19/26] tee: Use SHA-1 library instead of crypto_shash Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 20/26] lib/digsig: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 21/26] drm/bridge: it6505: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 22/26] nfc: s3fwrn5: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 23/26] ppp: mppe: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 24/26] KEYS: trusted_tpm1: " Eric Biggers
2025-07-12 23:23 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-07-12 23:23 ` [PATCH 26/26] lib/crypto: sha1: Remove low-level functions from API Eric Biggers
2025-07-14  5:22 ` [PATCH 00/26] SHA-1 library functions Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-18 17:24 ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250712232329.818226-26-ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).