From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1EC18859B; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 12:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752323853; cv=none; b=Fhig7ncE8A/LGR/RD5jLRRuCxzv9xCDK/u3/h0oEXQLBOUOTBrdFVq4Kj13lPDDqrWQoEj7mtjZHr4HzfIj0EBbvQDkgP4LGfe4JJq5edVhDVnBHamLgcxzIAbXoELdviEhyWj+FQ6QLknjXHkh5Sw4NfwdPsdVdofInL77XD54= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752323853; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+B4pE4dPACPvrddD2Ei3j45oBk2lkONau3fiIFlOTWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MUkEY+4zQFE6i0Mn6GaX/pMO1LMA8Ud0m7+7z3OEeeI4EPBPv1qk6NgLAlQd1cshP1D3ZvDo9yNxzskUg+396nC0/T2Xdobr2M9qBNWYNgd/Paf0D//4WRfNrEie+5hBWrxg7Tfdo5dusTu0CxsBeyIrBqlIA12gAKWtwpdNnCg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=mfA4wt2k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="mfA4wt2k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CDBDC4CEEF; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 12:37:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1752323853; bh=+B4pE4dPACPvrddD2Ei3j45oBk2lkONau3fiIFlOTWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mfA4wt2kfvaw9KFDRqoWo9nY/gTI0b/+bFgWspJN38/b025K6pEt9SWN0SL4goAep GNblOSw7ixQZhYR35BQPpmKumj0qkWBdyqw2mti+nXpTfjJilKmt2vpqTcX7FMx6Pd bDy2X5GMhglVtsre4TYPFV7NGJwWX3yL76+friOM= Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 14:37:30 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Martin Blumenstingl Cc: Guenter Roeck , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/411] 5.15.186-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025071238-decency-backboard-09dd@gregkh> References: <20250623130632.993849527@linuxfoundation.org> <70823da1-a24d-4694-bf8a-68ca7f85e8a3@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:05:14PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 8:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 03:02:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.186 release. > > > There are 411 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:51 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > ... > > > Martin Blumenstingl > > > drm/meson: use unsigned long long / Hz for frequency types > > > > > > > This patch triggers: > > > > Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed > > -------------- > > Error log: > > drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c:399:17: error: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90 [-Werror] > > 399 | .pll_freq = 2970000000, > > > > and other similar problems. This is with gcc 13.4.0. > Sorry to hear that this is causing issues. > Are you only seeing this with the backport on top of 5.15 or also on > top of mainline or -next? > > If it's only for 5.15 then personally I'd be happy with just skipping > this patch (and the ones that depend on it). It's already merged, and I see these errors in the Android build reports now. I think they've just disabled the driver entirely to get around it :( > 5.15 is scheduled to be sunset in 16 months and I am not aware of many > people running Amlogic SoCs with mainline 5.15. Great, can we send a "CONFIG_BROKEN" patch for this then? thanks, greg k-h