linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Keir Fraser" <keirf@google.com>,
	"Steven Moreland" <smoreland@google.com>,
	"Frederick Mayle" <fmayle@google.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put()
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:20:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714152103.6949-3-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714152103.6949-1-will@kernel.org>

When receiving a vsock packet in the guest, only the virtqueue buffer
size is validated prior to virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(). Unfortunately,
virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() uses the length from the packet header as the
length argument to skb_put(), potentially resulting in SKB overflow if
the host has gone wonky.

Validate the length as advertised by the packet header before calling
virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put().

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index f0e48e6911fc..bd2c6aaa1a93 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -624,8 +624,9 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	do {
 		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
 		for (;;) {
+			unsigned int len, payload_len;
+			struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
 			struct sk_buff *skb;
-			unsigned int len;
 
 			if (!virtio_transport_more_replies(vsock)) {
 				/* Stop rx until the device processes already
@@ -642,12 +643,19 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			vsock->rx_buf_nr--;
 
 			/* Drop short/long packets */
-			if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr) ||
+			if (unlikely(len < sizeof(*hdr) ||
 				     len > virtio_vsock_skb_len(skb))) {
 				kfree_skb(skb);
 				continue;
 			}
 
+			hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
+			payload_len = le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
+			if (payload_len > len - sizeof(*hdr)) {
+				kfree_skb(skb);
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(skb);
 			virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
 			virtio_transport_recv_pkt(&virtio_transport, skb);
-- 
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 15:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Will Deacon
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] vhost/vsock: Avoid allocating arbitrarily-sized SKBs Will Deacon
2025-07-15  9:47   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-07-15  9:53   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put() Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-15  9:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a 4K page Will Deacon
2025-07-15  9:56   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_alloc_skb() Will Deacon
2025-07-15  9:56   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] vsock/virtio: Move SKB allocation lower-bound check to callers Will Deacon
2025-07-15  9:57   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large receive buffers Will Deacon
2025-07-15 10:00   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers Will Deacon
2025-07-15 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-15 15:05   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250714152103.6949-3-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=fmayle@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=smoreland@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).