From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Keir Fraser" <keirf@google.com>,
"Steven Moreland" <smoreland@google.com>,
"Frederick Mayle" <fmayle@google.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put()
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:20:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714152103.6949-4-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714152103.6949-1-will@kernel.org>
virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() only calls skb_put() if the length in the
packet header is not zero even though skb_put() handles this case
gracefully.
Remove the functionally redundant check from virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put()
and, on the assumption that this is a worthwhile optimisation for
handling credit messages, augment the existing length checks in
virtio_transport_rx_work() to elide the call for zero-length payloads.
Since the callers all have the length, extend virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put()
to take it as an additional parameter rather than fish it back out of
the packet header.
Note that the vhost code already has similar logic in
vhost_vsock_alloc_skb().
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 2 +-
include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 9 ++-------
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index 66a0f060770e..4c4a642945eb 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ vhost_vsock_alloc_skb(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
return NULL;
}
- virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(skb);
+ virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(skb, payload_len);
nbytes = copy_from_iter(skb->data, payload_len, &iov_iter);
if (nbytes != payload_len) {
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
index 36fb3edfa403..97465f378ade 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
@@ -47,14 +47,9 @@ static inline void virtio_vsock_skb_clear_tap_delivered(struct sk_buff *skb)
VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->tap_delivered = false;
}
-static inline void virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static inline void virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 len)
{
- u32 len;
-
- len = le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len);
-
- if (len > 0)
- skb_put(skb, len);
+ skb_put(skb, len);
}
static inline struct sk_buff *virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t mask)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index bd2c6aaa1a93..1af7723669cb 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -656,7 +656,9 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
continue;
}
- virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(skb);
+ if (payload_len)
+ virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(skb, payload_len);
+
virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
virtio_transport_recv_pkt(&virtio_transport, skb);
}
--
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 15:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Will Deacon
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] vhost/vsock: Avoid allocating arbitrarily-sized SKBs Will Deacon
2025-07-15 9:47 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-15 9:53 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-07-15 9:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a 4K page Will Deacon
2025-07-15 9:56 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_alloc_skb() Will Deacon
2025-07-15 9:56 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] vsock/virtio: Move SKB allocation lower-bound check to callers Will Deacon
2025-07-15 9:57 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large receive buffers Will Deacon
2025-07-15 10:00 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers Will Deacon
2025-07-15 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-15 15:05 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250714152103.6949-4-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=fmayle@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=smoreland@google.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).