From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FFB1A76DA for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 02:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753324849; cv=none; b=S7r0PoHWDgT1cV129qHLu4lowU4PEeRPB0jSCdSZDF1P+MI2SXW1VPgPa4SXPUn9eAZGeCz24nYEdqdxua+19KIG5n8vWRgXIt8hw3DgePtbNaxio6eVkJnNEF5TMda4RU6qqZJRiLMiYGvJCVDgktiUmY6DNFvAioszUNmO9s4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753324849; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IfmxGFwXAOPgwm5Aeu9KgzFUl7eGC8GZ29NIYXgZojA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=QjQz8SyQe+IDdL+hrIbCxOgBbwt75tY3UXo9rQUH2R7IIYeOX9apeSJIfsz5uEBFl1xjSKeQvAggwSpD5jbpi9Jeh8bp46/+2lciLQjSW+6+GdCVVyVi3d2MjbGwzcdaT82G3bDz4255vc2o6qXsoBRQKjO0znp1BkedTk/7J1s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b=IrPzbTt/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b="IrPzbTt/" Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2349f096605so4967225ad.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 19:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1753324846; x=1753929646; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XMDqjQQCjg3m1Fdvyg+HpLMuE8v9dmDLtXOuYMQG03A=; b=IrPzbTt/0W4S+ePWCr2Px6P8UySqd0Te7WCQ22VYmeKlLNZ7NHtMoGbGuqofIEJ6pI nHerTeALUCi4vnsceiN9/vIN6Klg01hCkVc4nkbkrx1NqTe59ckoDEZzt8b3Fr0HQOWp 2XBo56FxBpBIWEp0ywSdHnaOoUf+BYvuE6V2nrHUA4WUVx2G9zo8niI2UoHaR0Ox2kB0 Ilz9OwD5SD3nNSmZbdYhZ6WOTw1JrYwXXww7Z2CMOMqXSoXDby7nn+corTcMBZ5l31mA NIhDqfuskg+tzfVdKpYxihwIcjh0mbDZje3Sg3GQ6wqp0JcSg19UIeajQ5THP9oD1ZqD 8FrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753324846; x=1753929646; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XMDqjQQCjg3m1Fdvyg+HpLMuE8v9dmDLtXOuYMQG03A=; b=D2q5IdXJbYt/bIQyVcsY8W4dKj3AN4wdDOwvdWDlnMqaSDWlNy/mcRvCQ3DaPvN+E7 ybiKEgHrrwT1TUN0LlARr/+GCC9YCBntsKdfhMArdD5NH3mdPx81iwsTmvAGZkDd3ul8 Ckl7kjWJ+lcOT4YEKW7xgoU4aVABwkRvmqowDRgzEDEyMNWLHOcjuz4dl9sZ+ld8Xr5O GtAdupGJQha28bWzezS+BpJ312Vl/luOb1+E8IaNu0mbdZI8vw1DMqJuWq5+E4wQqQuj uZ5fNbg+ceKwJtniP4g6KH8hlSVDFbz1208F16WHsC0+Ou8ieOpnwj0f1Z2BixWErQX9 r3Nw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWMyee5P/sM1LtqL+p8DQ0vwIad3M6Z2iiPnrgWV0YjijahhF5xQUilknKBCayVwehK8tn8rgDsK5OBTss=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPWAG8auCwhhIRWWcHeX1E2JVtbItVrBYuRUcRRErUdTmVlyXX ux8lEe0OshWDBZiA5cp/HLKvDBRApALLiFTtiiGd1e7HjAPZPoUm5pjhhsY5t24ekUM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctVn2hcPbsFQMUa0mljC3bYSPSdp+Hq9k7hOur/71OmrHkHwMEA5O1E+0Piix6 kyhBYUOSsgT301KZaOxpL1uORYiCMQU/J6zbEZtASyqAdI+iJmVSOz8pjdF728XH4c5/uRciXeG wBMR73mMYMP3mL9SDriDiDgXNl3p5RfpDxh5M9Ds+mccnajaIxFunk6/tmWIA/W/T5Fhx5ilc9W LnvVLNYIZrxKA/kuWdXIN3h/tTy3Ny2hmLr2UArLBUVkO0V/Yx7mVlI070L79mU+G+f3XEHjZ7z zR2PizrGzPaNOokZASaayYLcTmU4tSKBkCT2fPTnWo40DHC50Cf35hqzb9CkuF4ZjUgdQdFyowa nOwHp0GwYWy3k7PeW0pRhoBpj8haSdCmO/q1JyuqS+g7KwyEsaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBkFOJwOonnV0vdCxfjovFfviZCegG5ZM8HrGSCts+SkehAeNf110hY1sWS/eW0Y0itTjfPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1ac8:b0:234:b123:b4ff with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23f9814759dmr90270625ad.21.1753324846233; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 19:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.208.189.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-23fa48fa164sm3321195ad.172.2025.07.23.19.40.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Jul 2025 19:40:45 -0700 (PDT) From: lizhe.67@bytedance.com To: farman@linux.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lizhe.67@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_pin_pages_remote() Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:40:38 +0800 Message-ID: <20250724024038.75436-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:41:34 -0400, farman@linux.ibm.com wrote: > On Wed, 2025-07-23 at 15:09 +0800, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 12:32:59 -0400, farman@linux.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 16:53 +0800, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote: > > > > From: Li Zhe > > > > > > > > When vfio_pin_pages_remote() is called with a range of addresses that > > > > includes large folios, the function currently performs individual > > > > statistics counting operations for each page. This can lead to significant > > > > performance overheads, especially when dealing with large ranges of pages. > > > > Batch processing of statistical counting operations can effectively enhance > > > > performance. > > > > > > > > In addition, the pages obtained through longterm GUP are neither invalid > > > > nor reserved. Therefore, we can reduce the overhead associated with some > > > > calls to function is_invalid_reserved_pfn(). > > > > > > > > The performance test results for completing the 16G VFIO IOMMU DMA mapping > > > > are as follows. > > > > > > > > Base(v6.16-rc4): > > > > ------- AVERAGE (MADV_HUGEPAGE) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.047 s (340.2 GB/s) > > > > ------- AVERAGE (MAP_POPULATE) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.280 s (57.2 GB/s) > > > > ------- AVERAGE (HUGETLBFS) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.052 s (310.5 GB/s) > > > > > > > > With this patch: > > > > ------- AVERAGE (MADV_HUGEPAGE) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.027 s (602.1 GB/s) > > > > ------- AVERAGE (MAP_POPULATE) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.257 s (62.4 GB/s) > > > > ------- AVERAGE (HUGETLBFS) -------- > > > > VFIO MAP DMA in 0.031 s (517.4 GB/s) > > > > > > > > For large folio, we achieve an over 40% performance improvement. > > > > For small folios, the performance test results indicate a > > > > slight improvement. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhe > > > > Co-developed-by: Alex Williamson > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson > > > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand > > > > --- > > > > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Our CI started flagging some crashes running vfio-ccw regressions on the -next kernel beginning with > > > next-20250717, and bisect points to this particular commit. > > > > > > I can reproduce by cherry-picking this series onto 6.16-rc7, so it's not something else lurking. > > > Without panic_on_warn, I get a handful of warnings from vfio_remove_dma() (after starting/stopping > > > guests with an mdev attached), before eventually triggering a BUG() in vfio_dma_do_unmap() running a > > > hotplug test. I've attached an example of a WARNING before the eventual BUG below. I can help debug > > > this if more doc is needed, but admit I haven't looked at this patch in any detail yet. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eric > > > > > > [ 215.671885] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 215.671893] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 6210 at drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:1204 > > > vfio_remove_dma+0xda/0xf0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 215.671902] Modules linked in: vhost_vsock vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock vhost > > > vhost_iotlb algif_hash af_alg kvm nft_masq nft_ct nft_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv4 nft_reject act_csum > > > cls_u32 sch_htb nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables pkey_pckmo > > > s390_trng pkey_ep11 pkey_cca zcrypt_cex4 zcrypt eadm_sch rng_core vfio_ccw mdev vfio_iommu_type1 > > > vfio drm sch_fq_codel i2c_core drm_panel_orientation_quirks dm_multipath loop nfnetlink ctcm fsm > > > zfcp scsi_transport_fc mlx5_ib diag288_wdt mlx5_core ghash_s390 prng aes_s390 des_s390 libdes > > > sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 sha1_s390 sha_common rpcrdma sunrpc rdma_ucm rdma_cm > > > configfs iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua pkey autofs4 > > > [ 215.671946] CPU: 10 UID: 107 PID: 6210 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.16.0- > > > rc7-00005-g4ff8295d8d61 #79 NONE > > > [ 215.671950] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M05 780 (LPAR) > > > [ 215.671951] Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000002482f7ee55e (vfio_remove_dma+0xde/0xf0 > > > [vfio_iommu_type1]) > > > [ 215.671956] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 > > > [ 215.671959] Krnl GPRS: 006d010100000000 000000009d8a4c40 000000008f3b1c80 0000000092ffad20 > > > [ 215.671961] 0000000090b57880 006e010100000000 000000008f3b1c80 000000008f3b1cc8 > > > [ 215.671963] 0000000085b3ff00 000000008f3b1cc0 000000008f3b1c80 0000000092ffad20 > > > [ 215.671964] 000003ff867acfa8 000000008f3b1ca0 000001c8b36c3be0 000001c8b36c3ba8 > > > [ 215.671972] Krnl Code: 000002482f7ee550: c0e53ff9fcc8 brasl %r14,00000248af72dee0 > > > 000002482f7ee556: a7f4ffcf brc 15,000002482f7ee4f4 > > > #000002482f7ee55a: af000000 mc 0,0 > > > >000002482f7ee55e: a7f4ffa9 brc 15,000002482f7ee4b0 > > > 000002482f7ee562: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7ee564: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7ee566: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7ee568: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > [ 215.672006] Call Trace: > > > [ 215.672008] [<000002482f7ee55e>] vfio_remove_dma+0xde/0xf0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 215.672013] [<000002482f7f03de>] vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group+0x3de/0x5f0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 215.672016] [<000002482f7d4c4e>] vfio_group_detach_container+0x5e/0x180 [vfio] > > > [ 215.672023] [<000002482f7d2ce0>] vfio_group_fops_release+0x50/0x90 [vfio] > > > [ 215.672027] [<00000248af25e1ee>] __fput+0xee/0x2e0 > > > [ 215.672031] [<00000248aef19f18>] task_work_run+0x88/0xd0 > > > [ 215.672036] [<00000248aeef559a>] do_exit+0x18a/0x4e0 > > > [ 215.672042] [<00000248aeef5ab0>] do_group_exit+0x40/0xc0 > > > [ 215.672045] [<00000248aeef5b5e>] __s390x_sys_exit_group+0x2e/0x30 > > > [ 215.672048] [<00000248afc81e56>] __do_syscall+0x136/0x340 > > > [ 215.672054] [<00000248afc8da7e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90 > > > [ 215.672058] Last Breaking-Event-Address: > > > [ 215.672059] [<000002482f7ee4aa>] vfio_remove_dma+0x2a/0xf0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 215.672062] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > [ 219.861940] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > > > > ... > > > > > > [ 241.164333] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 241.164340] kernel BUG at drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:1480! > > > [ 241.164358] monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1]SMP > > > [ 241.164363] Modules linked in: vhost_vsock vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock vhost > > > vhost_iotlb algif_hash af_alg kvm nft_masq nft_ct nft_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv4 nft_reject act_csum > > > cls_u32 sch_htb nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables pkey_pckmo > > > s390_trng pkey_ep11 pkey_cca zcrypt_cex4 zcrypt eadm_sch rng_core vfio_ccw mdev vfio_iommu_type1 > > > vfio drm sch_fq_codel i2c_core drm_panel_orientation_quirks dm_multipath loop nfnetlink ctcm fsm > > > zfcp scsi_transport_fc mlx5_ib diag288_wdt mlx5_core ghash_s390 prng aes_s390 des_s390 libdes > > > sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 sha1_s390 sha_common rpcrdma sunrpc rdma_ucm rdma_cm > > > configfs iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua pkey autofs4 > > > [ 241.164399] CPU: 14 UID: 107 PID: 6581 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W > > > 6.16.0-rc7-00005-g4ff8295d8d61 #79 NONE > > > [ 241.164403] Tainted: [W]=WARN > > > [ 241.164404] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M05 780 (LPAR) > > > [ 241.164406] Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 000002482f7f132a (vfio_dma_do_unmap+0x4aa/0x4b0 > > > [vfio_iommu_type1]) > > > [ 241.164413] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 > > > [ 241.164415] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 000000000000000b 0000000040000000 000000008cfdcb40 > > > [ 241.164418] 0000000000001001 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000040000000 > > > [ 241.164419] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001fbe7f140 000000008cfdcb40 > > > [ 241.164421] 000003ff97dacfa8 0000000000000000 00000000871582c0 000001c8b4177cd0 > > > [ 241.164428] Krnl Code: 000002482f7f131e: a7890000 lghi %r8,0 > > > 000002482f7f1322: a7f4feeb brc 15,000002482f7f10f8 > > > #000002482f7f1326: af000000 mc 0,0 > > > >000002482f7f132a: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7f132c: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7f132e: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 > > > 000002482f7f1330: c0040000803c brcl 0,000002482f8013a8 > > > 000002482f7f1336: eb6ff0480024 stmg %r6,%r15,72(%r15) > > > [ 241.164458] Call Trace: > > > [ 241.164459] [<000002482f7f132a>] vfio_dma_do_unmap+0x4aa/0x4b0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 241.164463] [<000002482f7f1d08>] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0x1c8/0x370 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 241.164466] [<00000248af27704e>] vfs_ioctl+0x2e/0x70 > > > [ 241.164471] [<00000248af278610>] __s390x_sys_ioctl+0xe0/0x100 > > > [ 241.164474] [<00000248afc81e56>] __do_syscall+0x136/0x340 > > > [ 241.164477] [<00000248afc8da7e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90 > > > [ 241.164481] Last Breaking-Event-Address: > > > [ 241.164482] [<000002482f7f1238>] vfio_dma_do_unmap+0x3b8/0x4b0 [vfio_iommu_type1] > > > [ 241.164486] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops > > > > Thanks for the report. After a review of this commit, it appears that > > only the changes to vfio_find_vpfn() could plausibly account for the > > observed issue (I cannot be absolutely certain). Could you kindly test > > whether the issue persists after applying the following patch? > > Hi Zhe, > > Thank you for the quick patch! I applied this and ran through a few cycles of the previously- > problematic tests, and things are holding up great. > > It's probably a fixup to the commit here, but FWIW: > > Tested-by: Eric Farman > > Thanks, > Eric Thank you for your feedback. Also I anticipate that this fix-up patch will leave the optimizations introduced in the original submission essentially unaffected. Thanks, Zhe > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static struct vfio_pfn *vfio_find_vpfn_range(struct vfio_dma *dma, > > > > static inline struct vfio_pfn *vfio_find_vpfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova) > > { > > - return vfio_find_vpfn_range(dma, iova, iova + PAGE_SIZE); > > + return vfio_find_vpfn_range(dma, iova, iova + 1); > > }