From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix channel lookup in syscalib functions
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 13:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250727133135.385fa7c5@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250726-iio-adc-ad7124-fix-channel-lookup-in-syscalib-v1-1-b9d14bb684af@baylibre.com>
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:28:48 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Fix possible incorrect channel lookup in the syscalib functions by using
> the correct channel address instead of the channel number.
>
> In the ad7124 driver, the channel field of struct iio_chan_spec is the
> input pin number of the positive input of the channel. This can be, but
> is not always the same as the index in the channels array. The correct
> index in the channels array is stored in the address field (and also
> scan_index). We use the address field to perform the correct lookup.
>
> Fixes: 47036a03a303 ("iio: adc: ad7124: Implement internal calibration at probe time")
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Seems fine to me and i'll queue it up, but I would welcome another set of
eyes on this one.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> index 9808df2e92424283a86e9c105492c7447d071e44..4d8c6bafd1c3171054c72a0d2b13d6b1afc4e51a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ enum {
> static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan_spec *chan)
> {
> struct device *dev = &st->sd.spi->dev;
> - struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->channel];
> + struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->address];
> int ret;
>
> if (ch->syscalib_mode == AD7124_SYSCALIB_ZERO_SCALE) {
> @@ -865,8 +865,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %d after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> - chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %lu after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> + chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
> } else {
> ch->cfg.calibration_gain = st->gain_default;
>
> @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %d after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> - chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %lu after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> + chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static int ad7124_set_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> {
> struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> - st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode = mode;
> + st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode = mode;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int ad7124_get_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> {
> struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> - return st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode;
> + return st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode;
> }
>
> static const struct iio_enum ad7124_syscalib_mode_enum = {
>
> ---
> base-commit: e4d9886ad25adae72f38f2b12f41649b101581ae
> change-id: 20250726-iio-adc-ad7124-fix-channel-lookup-in-syscalib-e28c933ead2a
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-27 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-26 16:28 [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix channel lookup in syscalib functions David Lechner
2025-07-27 12:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-28 9:12 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250727133135.385fa7c5@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox