The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix channel lookup in syscalib functions
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 13:31:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250727133135.385fa7c5@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250726-iio-adc-ad7124-fix-channel-lookup-in-syscalib-v1-1-b9d14bb684af@baylibre.com>

On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:28:48 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:

> Fix possible incorrect channel lookup in the syscalib functions by using
> the correct channel address instead of the channel number.
> 
> In the ad7124 driver, the channel field of struct iio_chan_spec is the
> input pin number of the positive input of the channel. This can be, but
> is not always the same as the index in the channels array. The correct
> index in the channels array is stored in the address field (and also
> scan_index). We use the address field to perform the correct lookup.
> 
> Fixes: 47036a03a303 ("iio: adc: ad7124: Implement internal calibration at probe time")
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Seems fine to me and i'll queue it up, but I would welcome another set of
eyes on this one.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> index 9808df2e92424283a86e9c105492c7447d071e44..4d8c6bafd1c3171054c72a0d2b13d6b1afc4e51a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ enum {
>  static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan_spec *chan)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &st->sd.spi->dev;
> -	struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->channel];
> +	struct ad7124_channel *ch = &st->channels[chan->address];
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (ch->syscalib_mode == AD7124_SYSCALIB_ZERO_SCALE) {
> @@ -865,8 +865,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %d after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> -			chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "offset for channel %lu after zero-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> +			chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_offset);
>  	} else {
>  		ch->cfg.calibration_gain = st->gain_default;
>  
> @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int ad7124_syscalib_locked(struct ad7124_state *st, const struct iio_chan
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %d after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> -			chan->channel, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "gain for channel %lu after full-scale calibration: 0x%x\n",
> +			chan->address, ch->cfg.calibration_gain);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static int ad7124_set_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  {
>  	struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode = mode;
> +	st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode = mode;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int ad7124_get_syscalib_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  {
>  	struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	return st->channels[chan->channel].syscalib_mode;
> +	return st->channels[chan->address].syscalib_mode;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct iio_enum ad7124_syscalib_mode_enum = {
> 
> ---
> base-commit: e4d9886ad25adae72f38f2b12f41649b101581ae
> change-id: 20250726-iio-adc-ad7124-fix-channel-lookup-in-syscalib-e28c933ead2a
> 
> Best regards,


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-27 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-26 16:28 [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix channel lookup in syscalib functions David Lechner
2025-07-27 12:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-28  9:12   ` Nuno Sá

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250727133135.385fa7c5@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox