From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] auxiliary: Automatically generate id
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:11:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729111130.GI402218@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBOHCWV2QIAT.EEGEBRGQ60LX@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 12:01 PM CEST, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 11:36:27AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >> On Mon Jul 28, 2025 at 11:10 PM CEST, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> > As it turns out, ids are not allowed to have semantic meaning. Their
> >> > only purpose is to prevent sysfs collisions. To simplify things, just
> >> > generate a unique id for each auxiliary device. Remove all references to
> >> > filling in the id member of the device.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > drivers/base/auxiliary.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> > include/linux/auxiliary_bus.h | 26 ++++++++------------------
> >> > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
> >> > index dba7c8e13a53..f66067df03ad 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
> >> > @@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ static const struct bus_type auxiliary_bus_type = {
> >> > .pm = &auxiliary_dev_pm_ops,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > +static DEFINE_IDA(auxiliary_id);
> >>
> >> I think this is the correct thing to do, even though the per device IDA drivers
> >> typically went for so far produces IDs that are easier to handle when debugging
> >> things.
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > /**
> >> > * auxiliary_device_init - check auxiliary_device and initialize
> >> > * @auxdev: auxiliary device struct
> >> > @@ -331,20 +333,37 @@ int __auxiliary_device_add(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const char *modname)
> >> > return -EINVAL;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > + ret = ida_alloc(&auxiliary_id, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > + if (ret < 0) {
> >> > + dev_err(dev, "auxiliary device id_alloc fauiled: %d\n", ret);
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > + }
> >> > + auxdev->id = ret;
> >>
> >> This overwrites the ID number set by various drivers that (still) use the
> >> auxiliary_device_init() and auxiliary_device_add() pair.
> >>
> >> While I agree with the general intent, I think it's a very bad idea to just
> >> perform this change silently leaving drivers with their IDA instances not
> >> knowing that the set ID numbers do not have an effect anymore.
> >>
> >> I think this should be multiple steps:
> >>
> >> (1) Remove the id parameter and force an internal ID only for
> >> auxiliary_device_create().
> >>
> >> (2) Convert applicable drivers (and the Rust abstraction) to use
> >> auxiliary_device_create() rather than auxiliary_device_init() and
> >> auxiliary_device_add().
> >>
> >> (3) Treewide change to force an internal ID for all auxiliary devices
> >> considering this change in all affected drivers.
> >
> > I would suggest easier approach.
> > 1. Add to the proposal patch, the sed generated line which removes auxdev->id
> > assignment in the drivers.
> > Something like this from mlx5:
> > - sf_dev->adev.id = id;
> >
> > 2. Add standalone patches to remove not used ida_alloc/ida_free calls
> > from the drivers.
>
> I assume you suggest this as an alternative to (3) above? If so, that's what I
> meant in (3), I should have written "treewide series" instead of "treewide
> change".
I would say for all steps. Very important reason to use
auxiliary_device_init() and not auxiliary_device_create() is to bind
custom release callback, which is needed to release private data.
In addition, complex devices embed struct auxiliary_device in their
internal struct to rely on container_of to access the data.
See mlx5_sf_dev_add() in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/dev/dev.c
as an example.
>
> Technically (2) is orthogonal, yet I think it's a bit better to do the desired
> change right away. Otherwise we end up converting all applicable drivers to
> implement the auxiliary device release callback (which we need for a common
> ida_free()) first, just to remove it later on when we convert to
> auxiliary_device_create().
My expectation is to see extension of driver/base/core.c. Something like that:
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index cbc0099d8ef24..63847c84dbdc0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -2560,8 +2560,10 @@ static void device_release(struct kobject *kobj)
kfree(dev->dma_range_map);
- if (dev->release)
+ if (dev->release) {
+ dev->bus_specific_cleanup(dev);
dev->release(dev);
+ }
else if (dev->type && dev->type->release)
dev->type->release(dev);
else if (dev->class && dev->class->dev_release)
(END)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 21:10 [PATCH] auxiliary: Automatically generate id Sean Anderson
2025-07-29 9:36 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-29 10:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-29 10:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-29 11:11 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-07-29 11:28 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-29 11:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-29 12:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-29 12:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729111130.GI402218@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).