linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
	Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mempolicy: Clarify what zone reclaim means
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:41:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250731224155.1646-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731210738.1451854-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:07:37 -0700 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> wrote:

> The zone_reclaim_mode API controls the reclaim behavior when a node runs out of
> memory. Contrary to its user-facing name, it is internally referred to as
> "node_reclaim_mode".
> 
> This can be confusing. But because we cannot change the name of the API since
> it has been in place since at least 2.6, let's try to be more explicit about
> what the behavior of this API is. 
> 
> Change the description to clarify what zone reclaim entails, and be explicit
> about the RECLAIM_ZONE bit, whose purpose has led to some confusion in the
> past already [1] [2].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1579005573-58923-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200626003459.D8E015CA@viggo.jf.intel.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
> index 1f9bb10d1a47..6c9c9385ff89 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
> @@ -66,10 +66,16 @@ enum {
>  #define MPOL_F_MORON	(1 << 4) /* Migrate On protnone Reference On Node */
>  
>  /*
> + * Enabling zone reclaim means the page allocator will attempt to fulfill
> + * the allocation request on the current node by triggering reclaim and
> + * trying to shrink the current node.
> + * Fallback allocations on the next candidates in the zonelist are considered
> + * zone when reclaim fails to free up enough memory in the current node/zone.

s/zone when reclaim fails/when reclaim fails/ ?

> + *
>   * These bit locations are exposed in the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl
>   * ABI.  New bits are OK, but existing bits can never change.
>   */
> -#define RECLAIM_ZONE	(1<<0)	/* Run shrink_inactive_list on the zone */
> +#define RECLAIM_ZONE	(1<<0)	/* Enable zone reclaim */
>  #define RECLAIM_WRITE	(1<<1)	/* Writeout pages during reclaim */
>  #define RECLAIM_UNMAP	(1<<2)	/* Unmap pages during reclaim */
>  
> 
> base-commit: 260f6f4fda93c8485c8037865c941b42b9cba5d2
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Other than the above trivial thing,

Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-31 21:07 [PATCH v2] mempolicy: Clarify what zone reclaim means Joshua Hahn
2025-07-31 22:41 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-08-01  9:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-01 14:50     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-01  0:59 ` Huang, Ying
2025-08-01 14:48   ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-04  1:24     ` Huang, Ying
2025-08-04 14:41       ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-05  1:27         ` Huang, Ying
2025-08-05 20:03           ` Joshua Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250731224155.1646-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).