From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] lib/test_vmalloc: add no_block_alloc_test case
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 09:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250807075810.358714-2-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250807075810.358714-1-urezki@gmail.com>
Introduce a new test case "no_block_alloc_test" that verifies
non-blocking allocations using __vmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC and
GFP_NOWAIT flags.
It is recommended to build kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
enabled to help catch "sleeping while atomic" issues. This test
ensures that memory allocation logic under atomic constraints
does not inadvertently sleep.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
lib/test_vmalloc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
index 2815658ccc37..aae5f4910aff 100644
--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ __param(int, run_test_mask, 7,
"\t\tid: 256, name: kvfree_rcu_1_arg_vmalloc_test\n"
"\t\tid: 512, name: kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test\n"
"\t\tid: 1024, name: vm_map_ram_test\n"
+ "\t\tid: 2048, name: no_block_alloc_test\n"
/* Add a new test case description here. */
);
@@ -283,6 +284,30 @@ static int fix_size_alloc_test(void)
return 0;
}
+static int no_block_alloc_test(void)
+{
+ void *ptr;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < test_loop_count; i++) {
+ bool use_atomic = !!(get_random_u8() % 2);
+ gfp_t gfp = use_atomic ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_NOWAIT;
+ unsigned long size = (nr_pages > 0 ? nr_pages : 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ ptr = __vmalloc(size, gfp);
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ if (!ptr)
+ return -1;
+
+ *((__u8 *)ptr) = 0;
+ vfree(ptr);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
pcpu_alloc_test(void)
{
@@ -411,6 +436,7 @@ static struct test_case_desc test_case_array[] = {
{ "kvfree_rcu_1_arg_vmalloc_test", kvfree_rcu_1_arg_vmalloc_test, },
{ "kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test", kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test, },
{ "vm_map_ram_test", vm_map_ram_test, },
+ { "no_block_alloc_test", no_block_alloc_test, true },
/* Add a new test case here. */
};
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 7:58 [PATCH 0/8] __vmalloc() and no-block support Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 7:58 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] lib/test_vmalloc: Remove xfail condition check Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 9:59 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/vmalloc: Remove cond_resched() in vm_area_alloc_pages() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:22 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 10:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/kasan, mm/vmalloc: Respect GFP flags in kasan_populate_vmalloc() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 16:05 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2025-08-08 10:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmalloc: Defer freeing partly initialized vm_struct Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:25 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 10:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 4:21 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-18 13:02 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-19 8:56 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-19 9:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in __vmalloc_area_node() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:54 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 11:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 4:35 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-18 13:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-19 8:46 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: Drop __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM flag if PF_MEMALLOC is set Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 13:12 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-08 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 16:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 11:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] __vmalloc() and no-block support Marco Elver
2025-08-08 8:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-23 9:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250807075810.358714-2-urezki@gmail.com \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).