public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: 8250: exar: fix kernel warning in default_setup function
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:06:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250813130629.03832804@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJJ49CSBqGZM_b1Y@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 00:34:44 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 11:03:50AM +0000, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 10:48:17 +0200
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > > > index 04a0cbab02c2..5660bb897803 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > > > @@ -500,12 +500,13 @@ static int default_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev
> > > > *pcidev, struct uart_8250_port *port)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	const struct exar8250_board *board = priv->board;
> > > > +	unsigned int bar = 0;
> > > >  	unsigned char status;
> > > > -	int err;
> > > >  
> > > > -	err = serial8250_pci_setup_port(pcidev, port, 0, offset, board->reg_shift);
> > > > -	if (err)
> > > > -		return err;
> > > > +	port->port.iotype = UPIO_MEM;
> > > > +	port->port.mapbase = pci_resource_start(pcidev, bar) + offset;
> > > > +	port->port.membase = priv->virt + offset;
> > > > +	port->port.regshift = board->reg_shift;
> > > 
> > > And so now serial8250_pci_setup_port() is never called?  Are you sure
> > > that's ok?
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > I will not provide a second version of this patch, because this is a bigger
> > problem involving 8250_exar, 8250_pci and 8250_pci1xxxx. With the changes from
> > kernel 6.10 to 6.11 the underlying pcim_* functions where changed. The
> > serial8250_pci_setup_port() does checks on pci_dev + BAR where resources were
> > already mapped via pcim_iomap(), pci_iomap() or even pci_ioremap_bar(). Not
> > sure if mixing this is a good idea after the kernel 6.11 changes.
> > 
> > serial8250_pci_setup_port() uses pcim_iomap() and pcim_iomap_table() for checking
> > these already mapped resources. But the pcim_iomap_table() is deprecated and
> > suggests to use pcim_iomap() function to aquire the pointer to the resources
> > while at the same time pcim_iomap() description states, don't use this function 
> > twice on the same BAR. I think the most sane approach would be to drop the
> > pcim_iomap() and pcim_iomap_table() checks from the serial8250_pci_setup_port()
> > function. But I can not fully test this, I only have access to some hardware
> > used by the 8250_exar driver. I also CC Andy and Parker, both worked on the
> > affected code.
> 
> I'm on vacations right now and I lost context of this a long ago, please Cc me
> to any new version of this change to have a fresh look.

Hi Andy,

there is not much to add here. It is basically a recursivly added issue and
affects the three mentioned drivers. In my opinion it is safe to remove the
pcim_iomap() and pcim_iomap_table() functions checks from the generic
serial8250_pci_setup_port() function. To me it looks like the "newly"
implemented pcim_iomap(), which should not be used twice on the same pci bar,
is the only issue here. But I can only speak for the 8250_exar driver. We
use the fix in productions systems and it solves the issue. But beyond that?
To me the change of the pcim_iomap() looks like a design flaw in general,
allowing io-mapping only one resource per pci bar looks odd to me, but I am
not knowleged enough about these subsystems.

greetings

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29  8:17 [PATCH] tty: serial: 8250: exar: fix kernel warning in default_setup function Wilken Gottwalt
2025-07-29  8:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-29  9:32   ` Wilken Gottwalt
2025-07-30 11:03   ` Wilken Gottwalt
2025-08-05 21:34     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-13 11:06       ` Wilken Gottwalt [this message]
2025-08-13 13:30         ` Parker Newman
2025-10-27 12:18           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-27 12:31             ` Parker Newman
2025-10-27 14:33               ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250813130629.03832804@posteo.net \
    --to=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pnewman@connecttech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox