From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI from kernel
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814184646.GA1764877@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813-kbuild-userprogs-bits-v1-0-2d9f7f411083@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 07:43:39AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Make sure the byte order and ABI of the userprogs matches the one of the
> kernel, similar to how the bit size is handled.
> Otherwise the userprogs may not be executable.
> This happens for example on powerpc little endian, or riscv32.
>
> These patches where originally part of my series "kunit: Introduce UAPI
> testing framework" [0], but that isn't going anywhere right now and the
> patches are useful on their own.
>
> [0] kunit: Introduce UAPI testing framework
> ---
> Thomas Weißschuh (2):
> kbuild: userprogs: avoid duplication of flags inherited from kernel
> kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI from kernel
Seems reasonable to me. Should I fast track this via kbuild-fixes or
should I just apply it to kbuild-next? I am guessing you only noticed
this in the context of developing [0] so it might not be a big issue in
the wild?
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 5:43 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI from kernel Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-13 5:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: userprogs: avoid duplication of flags inherited " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-13 5:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-27 6:31 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-27 22:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-01 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-03 22:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-07 5:24 ` Nicolas Schier
2025-09-09 5:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-02 13:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-04 19:17 ` Nicolas Schier
2025-10-06 19:13 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-08-14 18:46 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-08-15 5:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-15 21:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250814184646.GA1764877@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox