From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
saravanak@google.com, robh@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenjun102@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Fix concurrent problem of deferred_probe_extend_timeout()
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:37:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025081431-puzzling-mumble-9570@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814111023.2693-2-wangwensheng4@huawei.com>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 07:10:21PM +0800, Wang Wensheng wrote:
> The deferred_probe_timeout_work may be canceled forever unexpected when
> deferred_probe_extend_timeout() executes concurrently. Start with
> deferred_probe_timeout_work pending, and the problem would
> occur after the following sequence.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> deferred_probe_extend_timeout
> -> cancel_delayed_work => true
> deferred_probe_extend_timeout
> -> cancel_delayed_wrok
> -> __cancel_work
> -> try_grab_pending
> -> schedule_delayed_work
> -> queue_delayed_work_on
> since pending bit is grabbed,
> just return without doing anything
> -> set_work_pool_and_clear_pending
> this __cancel_work return false and
> the work would never be queued again
>
> The root cause is that the PENDING_BIT of the work_struct would be set
> temporaily in __cancel_work and this bit could prevent the work_struct
> to be queued in another CPU.
>
> Use deferred_probe_mutex to protect the cancel and queue operations for
> the deferred_probe_timeout_work to fix this problem.
>
> Fixes: 2b28a1a84a0e ("driver core: Extend deferred probe timeout on driver registration")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/dd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 13ab98e033ea..1983919917e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(deferred_probe_timeout_work, deferred_probe_timeout_
>
> void deferred_probe_extend_timeout(void)
> {
> + mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> /*
> * If the work hasn't been queued yet or if the work expired, don't
> * start a new one.
> @@ -333,6 +334,7 @@ void deferred_probe_extend_timeout(void)
> pr_debug("Extended deferred probe timeout by %d secs\n",
> driver_deferred_probe_timeout);
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.22.0
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please
follow the documented rules in the
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 11:10 [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues for device probe Wang Wensheng
2025-08-14 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Fix concurrent problem of deferred_probe_extend_timeout() Wang Wensheng
2025-08-14 11:37 ` Greg KH
2025-08-14 12:45 ` wangwensheng (C)
2025-08-14 11:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-08-14 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] driver core: Introduce fw_devlink_relax_consumers helper Wang Wensheng
2025-08-14 11:39 ` Greg KH
2025-08-14 17:54 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-08-14 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/mbigen: Use fw_devlink_relax_consumers() helper Wang Wensheng
2025-08-14 11:39 ` Greg KH
2025-08-14 18:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-08-15 2:15 ` wangwensheng (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025081431-puzzling-mumble-9570@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chenjun102@huawei.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangwensheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).