linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@orca.pet>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
	Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add hintable NOPs emulation
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:26:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250821132605.2093c37a@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250820013452.495481-1-marcos@orca.pet>

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 03:34:46 +0200
Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@orca.pet> wrote:

> Hintable NOPs are a series of instructions introduced by Intel with the
> Pentium Pro (i686), and described in US patent US5701442A.
> 
> These instructions were reserved to allow backwards-compatible changes
> in the instruction set possible, by having old processors treat them as
> variable-length NOPs, while having other semantics in modern processors.
> 
> Some modern uses are:
>  - Multi-byte/long NOPs
>  - Indirect Branch Tracking (ENDBR32)
>  - Shadow Stack (part of CET)
> 
> Some processors advertising i686 compatibility lack full support for
> them, which may cause #UD to be incorrectly triggered, crashing software
> that uses then with an unexpected SIGILL.
> 
> One such software is sudo in Debian bookworm, which is compiled with
> GCC -fcf-protection=branch and contains ENDBR32 instructions. It crashes
> on my Vortex86DX3 processor and VIA C3 Nehalem processors [1].
> 
> This patch is a much simplified version of my previous patch for x86
> instruction emulation [2], that only emulates hintable NOPs.
> 
> When #UD is raised, it checks if the opcode corresponds to a hintable NOP
> in user space. If true, it warns the user via the dmesg and advances the
> instruction pointer, thus emulating its expected NOP behaviour.
> 
> [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/10/msg00118.html
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210626130313.1283485-1-marcos@orca.pet/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@orca.pet>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                 | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |  4 ++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c        |  3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 58d890fe2100..a6daebdc2573 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,35 @@ config X86_IOPL_IOPERM
>  	  ability to disable interrupts from user space which would be
>  	  granted if the hardware IOPL mechanism would be used.
>  
> +config X86_HNOP_EMU
> +	bool "Hintable NOPs emulation"
> +	depends on X86_32
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  Hintable NOPs are a series of instructions introduced by Intel with
> +	  the Pentium Pro (i686), and described in US patent US5701442A.
> +
> +	  These instructions were reserved to allow backwards-compatible
> +	  changes in the instruction set possible, by having old processors
> +	  treat them as variable-length NOPs, while having other semantics in
> +	  modern processors.
> +
> +	  Some modern uses are:
> +	   - Multi-byte/long NOPs
> +	   - Indirect Branch Tracking (ENDBR32)
> +	   - Shadow Stack (part of CET)
> +
> +	  Some processors advertising i686 compatibility (such as Cyrix MII,
> +	  VIA C3 Nehalem or DM&P Vortex86DX3) lack full support for them,
> +	  which may cause SIGILL to be incorrectly raised in user space when
> +	  a hintable NOP is encountered.
> +
> +	  Say Y here if you want the kernel to emulate them, allowing programs
> +	  that make use of them to run transparently on such processors.
> +
> +	  This emulation has no performance penalty for processors that
> +	  properly support them, so if unsure, enable it.
> +
>  config TOSHIBA
>  	tristate "Toshiba Laptop support"
>  	depends on X86_32
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index bde58f6510ac..c34fb678c4de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -499,6 +499,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
>  
>  	unsigned int		iopl_warn:1;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
> +	unsigned int		hnop_warn:1;
> +#endif
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Protection Keys Register for Userspace.  Loaded immediately on
>  	 * context switch. Store it in thread_struct to avoid a lookup in
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 1b7960cf6eb0..6ec8021638d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
>  	p->thread.io_bitmap = NULL;
>  	clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_IO_BITMAP);
>  	p->thread.iopl_warn = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
> +	p->thread.hnop_warn = 0;
> +#endif
>  	memset(p->thread.ptrace_bps, 0, sizeof(p->thread.ptrace_bps));
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index 36354b470590..2dcb7d7edf8a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -295,12 +295,48 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_overflow)
>  	do_error_trap(regs, 0, "overflow", X86_TRAP_OF, SIGSEGV, 0, NULL);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
> +static bool handle_hnop(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct thread_struct *t = &current->thread;
> +	unsigned char buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
> +	unsigned long nr_copied;
> +	struct insn insn;
> +
> +	nr_copied = insn_fetch_from_user(regs, buf);
> +	if (nr_copied <= 0)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!insn_decode_from_regs(&insn, regs, buf, nr_copied))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Hintable NOPs cover 0F 18 to 0F 1F */
> +	if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] != 0x0F ||
> +		insn.opcode.bytes[1] < 0x18 || insn.opcode.bytes[1] > 0x1F)
> +		return false;

Can you swap the order of those tests?
Looks like the 'decode' is only needed for the length.

> +
> +	if (!t->hnop_warn) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("%s[%d] emulating hintable NOP, ip:%lx\n",
> +		       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), regs->ip);
> +		t->hnop_warn = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	regs->ip += insn.length;
> +	return true;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
>  void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  #else
>  static inline void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  #endif
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
> +	if (user_mode(regs) && handle_hnop(regs))
> +		return;

Why not move the user_mode() test into handle_hnop() ?
Should make the config tests easier.

	David

> +#endif
> +
>  	do_error_trap(regs, 0, "invalid opcode", X86_TRAP_UD, SIGILL,
>  		      ILL_ILLOPN, error_get_trap_addr(regs));
>  }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-20  1:34 [PATCH] x86: add hintable NOPs emulation Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 12:28   ` David Laight
2025-08-21 12:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 18:40       ` David Laight
2025-08-21 19:46         ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 15:11     ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20  9:14 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-20  9:33   ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20  9:43     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  9:51       ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20  9:55         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20 10:01           ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20 10:08             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20 10:21               ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-20 10:30                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-21  2:00             ` Kees Cook
2025-08-20 10:11     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-20 10:30       ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-21  1:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-08-21  9:35   ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21  5:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-08-21 12:26 ` David Laight [this message]
2025-08-21 12:48   ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 13:45   ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 13:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-22 22:12   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250821132605.2093c37a@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcos@orca.pet \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=snovitoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).