* [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries @ 2025-08-22 17:23 Stefano Brivio 2025-08-22 23:09 ` Andrew Morton 2025-08-23 1:53 ` wangzijie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Brivio @ 2025-08-22 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel Cc: Andrew Morton, wangzijie, Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Brauner, passt-dev, Al Viro, Ye Bin, Alexei Starovoitov, Rick P . Edgecombe, Kirill A . Shutemov Commit ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") breaks lseek() for all /proc/net entries, as shown for instance by pasta(1), a user-mode network implementation using those entries to scan for bound ports: $ strace -e openat,lseek -e s=none pasta -- true [...] openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 12 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 13 lseek(12, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek lseek(13, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 14 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 lseek(14, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek lseek(15, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek [...] That's because PROC_ENTRY_proc_lseek isn't set for /proc/net entries, and it's now mandatory for lseek(). In fact, flags aren't set at all for those entries because pde_set_flags() isn't called for them. As commit d919b33dafb3 ("proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" files") introduced flags for procfs directory entries, along with the pde_set_flags() helper, they weren't relevant for /proc/net entries, so the lack of pde_set_flags() calls in proc_create_net_*() functions was harmless. Now that the calls are strictly needed for lseek() functionality, add them. Fixes: ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> --- fs/proc/generic.c | 2 +- fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + fs/proc/proc_net.c | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c index 76e800e38c8f..57ec5e385d1b 100644 --- a/fs/proc/generic.c +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_reg(const char *name, umode_t mode, return p; } -static void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) { if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT; diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index e737401d7383..a358974f14d2 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ extern struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int) struct dentry *proc_lookup_de(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct proc_dir_entry *); extern int proc_readdir(struct file *, struct dir_context *); int proc_readdir_de(struct file *, struct dir_context *, struct proc_dir_entry *); +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde); static inline void pde_get(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) { diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c index 52f0b75cbce2..20bc7481b02c 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data(const char *name, umode_t mode, p->proc_ops = &proc_net_seq_ops; p->seq_ops = ops; p->state_size = state_size; + pde_set_flags(p); return proc_register(parent, p); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data); @@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data_write(const char *name, umode_t mode p->seq_ops = ops; p->state_size = state_size; p->write = write; + pde_set_flags(p); return proc_register(parent, p); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data_write); @@ -217,6 +219,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single(const char *name, umode_t mode, pde_force_lookup(p); p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; p->single_show = show; + pde_set_flags(p); return proc_register(parent, p); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single); @@ -261,6 +264,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single_write(const char *name, umode_t mo p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; p->single_show = show; p->write = write; + pde_set_flags(p); return proc_register(parent, p); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single_write); -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries 2025-08-22 17:23 [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries Stefano Brivio @ 2025-08-22 23:09 ` Andrew Morton 2025-08-23 8:42 ` Stefano Brivio 2025-08-23 1:53 ` wangzijie 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-08-22 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Brivio Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, wangzijie, Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Brauner, passt-dev, Al Viro, Ye Bin, Alexei Starovoitov, Rick P . Edgecombe, Kirill A . Shutemov On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 19:23:35 +0200 Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote: > Commit ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek > as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") breaks lseek() for all /proc/net > entries, as shown for instance by pasta(1), a user-mode network > implementation using those entries to scan for bound ports: > > $ strace -e openat,lseek -e s=none pasta -- true > [...] > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 12 > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 13 > lseek(12, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > lseek(13, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 14 > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 > lseek(14, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > lseek(15, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > [...] > > That's because PROC_ENTRY_proc_lseek isn't set for /proc/net entries, > and it's now mandatory for lseek(). In fact, flags aren't set at all > for those entries because pde_set_flags() isn't called for them. > > As commit d919b33dafb3 ("proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" > files") introduced flags for procfs directory entries, along with the > pde_set_flags() helper, they weren't relevant for /proc/net entries, > so the lack of pde_set_flags() calls in proc_create_net_*() functions > was harmless. > > Now that the calls are strictly needed for lseek() functionality, > add them. Thanks. We already have https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250821105806.1453833-1-wangzijie1@honor.com - does that look suitable? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries 2025-08-22 23:09 ` Andrew Morton @ 2025-08-23 8:42 ` Stefano Brivio 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Brivio @ 2025-08-23 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, wangzijie, Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Brauner, passt-dev, Al Viro, Ye Bin, Alexei Starovoitov, Rick P . Edgecombe, Kirill A . Shutemov On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:09:04 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 19:23:35 +0200 Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Commit ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek > > as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") breaks lseek() for all /proc/net > > entries, as shown for instance by pasta(1), a user-mode network > > implementation using those entries to scan for bound ports: > > > > $ strace -e openat,lseek -e s=none pasta -- true > > [...] > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 12 > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 13 > > lseek(12, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > lseek(13, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 14 > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 > > lseek(14, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > lseek(15, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > [...] > > > > That's because PROC_ENTRY_proc_lseek isn't set for /proc/net entries, > > and it's now mandatory for lseek(). In fact, flags aren't set at all > > for those entries because pde_set_flags() isn't called for them. > > > > As commit d919b33dafb3 ("proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" > > files") introduced flags for procfs directory entries, along with the > > pde_set_flags() helper, they weren't relevant for /proc/net entries, > > so the lack of pde_set_flags() calls in proc_create_net_*() functions > > was harmless. > > > > Now that the calls are strictly needed for lseek() functionality, > > add them. > > Thanks. We already have > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250821105806.1453833-1-wangzijie1@honor.com > - does that look suitable? Sorry, I didn't spot that one. It sure does! -- Stefano ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries 2025-08-22 17:23 [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries Stefano Brivio 2025-08-22 23:09 ` Andrew Morton @ 2025-08-23 1:53 ` wangzijie 2025-08-23 8:43 ` Stefano Brivio 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: wangzijie @ 2025-08-23 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sbrivio Cc: adobriyan, akpm, ast, brauner, kirill.shutemov, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, passt-dev, rick.p.edgecombe, viro, wangzijie1, jirislaby > Commit ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek > as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") breaks lseek() for all /proc/net > entries, as shown for instance by pasta(1), a user-mode network > implementation using those entries to scan for bound ports: > > $ strace -e openat,lseek -e s=none pasta -- true > [...] > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 12 > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 13 > lseek(12, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > lseek(13, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 14 > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 > lseek(14, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > lseek(15, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > [...] > > That's because PROC_ENTRY_proc_lseek isn't set for /proc/net entries, > and it's now mandatory for lseek(). In fact, flags aren't set at all > for those entries because pde_set_flags() isn't called for them. > > As commit d919b33dafb3 ("proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" > files") introduced flags for procfs directory entries, along with the > pde_set_flags() helper, they weren't relevant for /proc/net entries, > so the lack of pde_set_flags() calls in proc_create_net_*() functions > was harmless. > > Now that the calls are strictly needed for lseek() functionality, > add them. > > Fixes: ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> > --- > fs/proc/generic.c | 2 +- > fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + > fs/proc/proc_net.c | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c > index 76e800e38c8f..57ec5e385d1b 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/generic.c > +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c > @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_reg(const char *name, umode_t mode, > return p; > } > > -static void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > { > if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) > pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT; > diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h > index e737401d7383..a358974f14d2 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/internal.h > +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h > @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ extern struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int) > struct dentry *proc_lookup_de(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > extern int proc_readdir(struct file *, struct dir_context *); > int proc_readdir_de(struct file *, struct dir_context *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde); > > static inline void pde_get(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > { > diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c > index 52f0b75cbce2..20bc7481b02c 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data(const char *name, umode_t mode, > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_seq_ops; > p->seq_ops = ops; > p->state_size = state_size; > + pde_set_flags(p); > return proc_register(parent, p); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data); > @@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data_write(const char *name, umode_t mode > p->seq_ops = ops; > p->state_size = state_size; > p->write = write; > + pde_set_flags(p); > return proc_register(parent, p); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data_write); > @@ -217,6 +219,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single(const char *name, umode_t mode, > pde_force_lookup(p); > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; > p->single_show = show; > + pde_set_flags(p); > return proc_register(parent, p); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single); > @@ -261,6 +264,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single_write(const char *name, umode_t mo > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; > p->single_show = show; > p->write = write; > + pde_set_flags(p); > return proc_register(parent, p); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single_write); > -- > 2.43.0 Hi Stefano, Thanks for your patch, Lars reported this bug last week: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815195616.64497967@chagall.paradoxon.rec/ Jiri suggested to make pde_set_flags() part of proc_register(). I think it can help to avoid lack of pde_set_flags() calls in the future and make code clean. I have submitted a patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821105806.1453833-1-wangzijie1@honor.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries 2025-08-23 1:53 ` wangzijie @ 2025-08-23 8:43 ` Stefano Brivio 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Brivio @ 2025-08-23 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: wangzijie Cc: adobriyan, akpm, ast, brauner, kirill.shutemov, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, passt-dev, rick.p.edgecombe, viro, jirislaby, Lars Wendler Hi wangzijie, On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 09:53:49 +0800 wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com> wrote: > > Commit ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek > > as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") breaks lseek() for all /proc/net > > entries, as shown for instance by pasta(1), a user-mode network > > implementation using those entries to scan for bound ports: > > > > $ strace -e openat,lseek -e s=none pasta -- true > > [...] > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 12 > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 13 > > lseek(12, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > lseek(13, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 14 > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/net/udp6", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 15 > > lseek(14, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > lseek(15, 0, SEEK_SET) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > > lseek() failed on /proc/net file: Illegal seek > > [...] > > > > That's because PROC_ENTRY_proc_lseek isn't set for /proc/net entries, > > and it's now mandatory for lseek(). In fact, flags aren't set at all > > for those entries because pde_set_flags() isn't called for them. > > > > As commit d919b33dafb3 ("proc: faster open/read/close with "permanent" > > files") introduced flags for procfs directory entries, along with the > > pde_set_flags() helper, they weren't relevant for /proc/net entries, > > so the lack of pde_set_flags() calls in proc_create_net_*() functions > > was harmless. > > > > Now that the calls are strictly needed for lseek() functionality, > > add them. > > > > Fixes: ff7ec8dc1b64 ("proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al") > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> > > --- > > fs/proc/generic.c | 2 +- > > fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + > > fs/proc/proc_net.c | 4 ++++ > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c > > index 76e800e38c8f..57ec5e385d1b 100644 > > --- a/fs/proc/generic.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c > > @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_reg(const char *name, umode_t mode, > > return p; > > } > > > > -static void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > > +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > > { > > if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) > > pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT; > > diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h > > index e737401d7383..a358974f14d2 100644 > > --- a/fs/proc/internal.h > > +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h > > @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ extern struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int) > > struct dentry *proc_lookup_de(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > > extern int proc_readdir(struct file *, struct dir_context *); > > int proc_readdir_de(struct file *, struct dir_context *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > > +void pde_set_flags(struct proc_dir_entry *pde); > > > > static inline void pde_get(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > > { > > diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c > > index 52f0b75cbce2..20bc7481b02c 100644 > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c > > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data(const char *name, umode_t mode, > > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_seq_ops; > > p->seq_ops = ops; > > p->state_size = state_size; > > + pde_set_flags(p); > > return proc_register(parent, p); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data); > > @@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_data_write(const char *name, umode_t mode > > p->seq_ops = ops; > > p->state_size = state_size; > > p->write = write; > > + pde_set_flags(p); > > return proc_register(parent, p); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_data_write); > > @@ -217,6 +219,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single(const char *name, umode_t mode, > > pde_force_lookup(p); > > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; > > p->single_show = show; > > + pde_set_flags(p); > > return proc_register(parent, p); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single); > > @@ -261,6 +264,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create_net_single_write(const char *name, umode_t mo > > p->proc_ops = &proc_net_single_ops; > > p->single_show = show; > > p->write = write; > > + pde_set_flags(p); > > return proc_register(parent, p); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(proc_create_net_single_write); > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > Hi Stefano, > Thanks for your patch, Lars reported this bug last week: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815195616.64497967@chagall.paradoxon.rec/ Apologies, I didn't see that. It's definitely the same issue. > Jiri suggested to make pde_set_flags() part of proc_register(). I think it can help > to avoid lack of pde_set_flags() calls in the future and make code clean. Right, I was pondering to try something like that, but I just wanted to submit a minimal fix for the moment being. In any case, you have it ready, and it's obviously cleaner than my solution, so, of course, let's discard my patch. > I have submitted a patch: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821105806.1453833-1-wangzijie1@honor.com I just tested it, it works for me. Thanks for fixing that! -- Stefano ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-23 8:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-08-22 17:23 [PATCH] proc: Bring back lseek() operations for /proc/net entries Stefano Brivio 2025-08-22 23:09 ` Andrew Morton 2025-08-23 8:42 ` Stefano Brivio 2025-08-23 1:53 ` wangzijie 2025-08-23 8:43 ` Stefano Brivio
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).