From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Danct12 <danct12@disroot.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: fix msm_gem_vma_new() allocations for managed GPUVMs
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:09:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825090908.269e1119@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250823-msm-fix-gpuvm-init-v1-1-e199cd5b1983@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 03:12:00 +0300
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Since commit 3309323241fb ("drm/gpuvm: Kill drm_gpuva_init()") MSM
> driver fails to init, failing with "[drm:msm_gpu_init] *ERROR* could not
> allocate memptrs: -22" errors. The mentioned commit reworked the
> function, but didn't take into account that op_map is initialized at the
> top of the function, while ranges might change if GPUVM is managed by
> the kernel.
>
> Move op_mode initialization after finalizing all addresses and right
> before the drm_gpuva_init_from_op() call.
>
> Reported-by: Danct12 <danct12@disroot.org>
> Fixes: 3309323241fb ("drm/gpuvm: Kill drm_gpuva_init()")
> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> index 3f440bc1f7106f3b0091f037611d0b433e5e2c18..6df6b7c0984da57fe64de41fa54f7dea0a324c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> @@ -368,12 +368,6 @@ struct drm_gpuva *
> msm_gem_vma_new(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> u64 offset, u64 range_start, u64 range_end)
> {
> - struct drm_gpuva_op_map op_map = {
> - .va.addr = range_start,
> - .va.range = range_end - range_start,
> - .gem.obj = obj,
> - .gem.offset = offset,
> - };
> struct msm_gem_vm *vm = to_msm_vm(gpuvm);
> struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo;
> struct msm_gem_vma *vma;
> @@ -402,6 +396,13 @@ msm_gem_vma_new(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> if (obj)
> GEM_WARN_ON((range_end - range_start) > obj->size);
>
> + struct drm_gpuva_op_map op_map = {
> + .va.addr = range_start,
> + .va.range = range_end - range_start,
> + .gem.obj = obj,
> + .gem.offset = offset,
> + };
OOC, are we now allowed to declare local variables in the middle of a
code block in kernel code? I must admit that's not something I tried
doing recently, but I've had gcc warnings in the past because of that.
> +
> drm_gpuva_init_from_op(&vma->base, &op_map);
> vma->mapped = false;
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0f4c93f7eb861acab537dbe94441817a270537bf
> change-id: 20250823-msm-fix-gpuvm-init-520d87ebcf26
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-23 0:12 [PATCH] drm/msm: fix msm_gem_vma_new() allocations for managed GPUVMs Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-08-23 0:14 ` Rob Clark
2025-08-23 13:50 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-08-23 14:14 ` Rob Clark
2025-08-23 14:21 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-08-25 7:09 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2025-08-25 13:08 ` Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250825090908.269e1119@fedora \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=danct12@disroot.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).