From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kasong@tencent.com,
nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] huge_mm.h: disallow is_huge_zero_folio(NULL)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250827165309.44e465ff214e45f1a6665b24@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827150330.280399-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:03:30 +0200 Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> wrote:
> Calling is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should not be legal - it makes no
> sense, and a different (theoretical) implementation may dereference
> the pointer. But currently, lacking any explicit documentation, this
> call is possible.
>
> But if somebody really passes NULL, the function should not return
> true - this isn't the huge zero folio after all! However, if the
> `huge_zero_folio` hasn't been allocated yet, it's NULL, and
> is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) just happens to return true, which is a lie.
>
> This weird side effect prevented me from reproducing a kernel crash
> that occurred when the elements of a folio_batch were NULL - since
> folios_put_refs() skips huge zero folios, this sometimes causes a
> crash, but sometimes does not. For debugging, it is better to reveal
> such bugs reliably and not hide them behind random preconditions like
> "has the huge zero folio already been created?"
>
> To improve detection of such bugs, David Hildenbrand suggested adding
> a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE().
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_HUGE_MM_H
> #define _LINUX_HUGE_MM_H
>
> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h> // for VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>
> #include <linux/fs.h> /* only for vma_is_dax() */
> @@ -479,6 +480,8 @@ extern unsigned long huge_zero_pfn;
>
> static inline bool is_huge_zero_folio(const struct folio *folio)
> {
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio == NULL);
> +
> return READ_ONCE(huge_zero_folio) == folio;
> }
OK, but it remains the case that we have seen code which calls
is_huge_zero_folio() prior to the initialization of huge_zero_folio.
Is this a bug? I think so. Should we be checking for recurrences of
this bug?
Also, sigh. I do dislike seeing VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in an inline
function - heaven knows how much bloat that adds. Defconfig
mm/huge_memory.o (which has three calls) grows by 80 bytes so I guess
that's livable with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-27 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 23:16 [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false Max Kellermann
2025-08-26 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/swap: add BUG_ON(folio==NULL) to folios_put_refs() Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 1:42 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-27 2:12 ` Chris Li
2025-08-27 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 1:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false Zi Yan
2025-08-27 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-27 4:39 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 10:13 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 13:06 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] huge_mm.h: disallow is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 15:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-27 15:38 ` Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 20:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 20:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 20:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 8:48 ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kellermann
2025-08-28 9:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-29 1:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-27 23:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-08-28 5:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Max Kellermann
2025-08-28 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] huge_mm.h: is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) should return false Max Kellermann
2025-08-27 9:35 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250827165309.44e465ff214e45f1a6665b24@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).