From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102062D6418; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756315716; cv=none; b=NHxDvVnRrDsIQk/dtq3uRTT/tC7cgL7aTRPpQ794yJtHwSdqbdoPLovtA7Gni/MVmuP+Ty0vjkuO2ftgcAOoEgTIpKbs0fzKx7WkTDOm6K0cHNfryTlKujmE2hEx745lsxrBm55sUM1z2sstFLd3sJ28XwUeNUfnUkSuAqMPxQU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756315716; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UtrbolA1HHDmLzgsn3xYeflYPsigIkwUh0momqKEeHk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=btFvVokbSZxUuWLbSRwoWgNyDucski/lHF9pLv49hElHS4JVUqhbppVJCCFHVDVgoyoVEdXilExvWaysshsuKQqZiMQhTNmb0Fobsdvxv81/8tfRKv7AHdBqgQ8PFp88+OH2sYxSGHVWdAgvzJlePdKmoo+iYN2gNPY0hxwjCMc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PqU8HTMS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PqU8HTMS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 620B1C4CEEB; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756315713; bh=UtrbolA1HHDmLzgsn3xYeflYPsigIkwUh0momqKEeHk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PqU8HTMSa5I6ObcVPSD4d6fKFh1wfzdb23B3poxfHNfoGUDbJCIqkxP6+I4ROQbd2 Z6xA07kdpSE/mdfKDSKk+ea2P5RvKDCmcmk9GQ2e/M41195zoHe20Yc4cCoRhjrmQm GN3g9T4c7il6y5uFDmLbfIqONUInMwlXcDlgfcdS5ZMSBmP/S6CmkvquFnzYZMdtHx gRKpt14RcBAfZ1nR9UYvuLDLQ8L+tVLj7CopjeLh4i31juvpj2ak2NT2vwh/nUL3Wr w+x0MN175xpyHRzneD8cpnC70V4KmE74o56eLhzuUlFhYrxaL0+6necozhXfn6n/V6 nBOgBoF20lxwg== Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:28:28 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Michal Kubiak , Maciej Fijalkowski , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , nxne.cnse.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v5 00/13] idpf: add XDP support Message-ID: <20250827172828.GP10519@horms.kernel.org> References: <20250826155507.2138401-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250826155507.2138401-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > Add XDP support (w/o XSk for now) to the idpf driver using the libeth_xdp > sublib. All possible verdicts, .ndo_xdp_xmit(), multi-buffer etc. are here. > In general, nothing outstanding comparing to ice, except performance -- > let's say, up to 2x for .ndo_xdp_xmit() on certain platforms and > scenarios. > idpf doesn't support VLAN Rx offload, so only the hash hint is > available for now. > > Patches 1-7 are prereqs, without which XDP would either not work at all or > work slower/worse/... Hi Alexander, I'm wondering if you could give a hash that this patch-set applies to. Or a branch where it has been applied. I suspect it's terribly obvious how to do this, but I'm drawing a blank here. Thanks!