From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] module: separate vermagic and livepatch checks
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:49:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829084927.156676-5-wangjinchao600@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829084927.156676-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Rename check_modinfo() to check_modinfo_vermagic() to clarify it only
checks vermagic compatibility.
Move livepatch check to happen after vermagic check in early_mod_check(),
creating proper separation of concerns.
No functional changes, just clearer code organization.
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
---
kernel/module/main.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
index e7484c6ce6e3..98a678a18300 100644
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@ -2571,7 +2571,8 @@ static void module_augment_kernel_taints(struct module *mod, struct load_info *i
}
-static int check_modinfo(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info, int flags)
+static int check_modinfo_vermagic(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info,
+ int flags)
{
const char *modmagic = get_modinfo(info, "vermagic");
int err;
@@ -2590,10 +2591,6 @@ static int check_modinfo(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info, int flags)
return -ENOEXEC;
}
- err = check_modinfo_livepatch(mod, info);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -3334,7 +3331,11 @@ static int early_mod_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
if (!check_modstruct_version(info, info->mod))
return -ENOEXEC;
- err = check_modinfo(info->mod, info, flags);
+ err = check_modinfo_vermagic(info->mod, info, flags);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = check_modinfo_livepatch(info->mod, info);
if (err)
return err;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 8:49 [PATCH v3 0/4] module: logging and code improvements Jinchao Wang
2025-08-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] module: signing: Use pr_err for signature rejection Jinchao Wang
2025-09-01 9:25 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-09-01 18:18 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-09-02 1:57 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-08-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] module: show why force load fails Jinchao Wang
2025-09-01 9:26 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-09-01 18:29 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-09-02 2:06 ` Jinchao Wang
2025-08-29 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] module: centralize no-versions force load check Jinchao Wang
2025-09-01 9:30 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-08-29 8:49 ` Jinchao Wang [this message]
2025-09-01 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] module: separate vermagic and livepatch checks Petr Pavlu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829084927.156676-5-wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
--to=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).