* [PATCH][v3] mm/hugetlb: Retry to allocate for early boot hugepage allocation
@ 2025-08-29 9:52 lirongqing
2025-08-29 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: lirongqing @ 2025-08-29 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
giorgitchankvetadze1997
Cc: Li RongQing
From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
In cloud environments with massive hugepage reservations (95%+ of system
RAM), single-attempt allocation during early boot often fails due to
memory pressure.
Commit 91f386bf0772 ("hugetlb: batch freeing of vmemmap pages") intensified
this by deferring page frees, increase peak memory usage during allocation.
Introduce a retry mechanism that leverages vmemmap optimization reclaim
(~1.6% memory) when available. Upon initial allocation failure, the system
retries until successful or no further progress is made, ensuring reliable
hugepage allocation while preserving batched vmemmap freeing benefits.
Testing on a 256G machine allocating 252G of hugepages:
Before: 128056/129024 hugepages allocated
After: Successfully allocated all 129024 hugepages
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
---
Diff with v2: auto retry mechanism
Diff with v1: add log if two-phase hugepage allocation is triggered
add the knod to control split ratio
mm/hugetlb.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 753f99b..18e54ea 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3589,10 +3589,9 @@ static unsigned long __init hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
unsigned long jiffies_start;
unsigned long jiffies_end;
+ unsigned long remaining;
job.thread_fn = hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot_node;
- job.start = 0;
- job.size = h->max_huge_pages;
/*
* job.max_threads is 25% of the available cpu threads by default.
@@ -3616,10 +3615,30 @@ static unsigned long __init hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
}
job.max_threads = hugepage_allocation_threads;
- job.min_chunk = h->max_huge_pages / hugepage_allocation_threads;
jiffies_start = jiffies;
- padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
+ do {
+ remaining = h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages;
+
+ job.start = h->nr_huge_pages;
+ job.size = remaining;
+ job.min_chunk = remaining / hugepage_allocation_threads;
+ padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
+
+ if (h->nr_huge_pages == h->max_huge_pages)
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * Retry allocation if vmemmap optimization is available, the
+ * optimization frees ~1.6% of memory of hugepages, this reclaimed
+ * memory enables additional hugepage allocations
+ */
+ if (!hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable(h))
+ break;
+
+ /* Continue if progress was made in last iteration */
+ } while (remaining != (h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages));
+
jiffies_end = jiffies;
pr_info("HugeTLB: allocation took %dms with hugepage_allocation_threads=%ld\n",
--
2.9.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][v3] mm/hugetlb: Retry to allocate for early boot hugepage allocation
2025-08-29 9:52 [PATCH][v3] mm/hugetlb: Retry to allocate for early boot hugepage allocation lirongqing
@ 2025-08-29 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-08-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lirongqing, muchun.song, osalvador, akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
giorgitchankvetadze1997
On 29.08.25 11:52, lirongqing wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>
> In cloud environments with massive hugepage reservations (95%+ of system
> RAM), single-attempt allocation during early boot often fails due to
> memory pressure.
>
> Commit 91f386bf0772 ("hugetlb: batch freeing of vmemmap pages") intensified
> this by deferring page frees, increase peak memory usage during allocation.
>
> Introduce a retry mechanism that leverages vmemmap optimization reclaim
> (~1.6% memory) when available. Upon initial allocation failure, the system
> retries until successful or no further progress is made, ensuring reliable
> hugepage allocation while preserving batched vmemmap freeing benefits.
>
> Testing on a 256G machine allocating 252G of hugepages:
> Before: 128056/129024 hugepages allocated
> After: Successfully allocated all 129024 hugepages
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
> Diff with v2: auto retry mechanism
> Diff with v1: add log if two-phase hugepage allocation is triggered
> add the knod to control split ratio
>
> mm/hugetlb.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 753f99b..18e54ea 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3589,10 +3589,9 @@ static unsigned long __init hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
>
> unsigned long jiffies_start;
> unsigned long jiffies_end;
> + unsigned long remaining;
>
> job.thread_fn = hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot_node;
> - job.start = 0;
> - job.size = h->max_huge_pages;
>
> /*
> * job.max_threads is 25% of the available cpu threads by default.
> @@ -3616,10 +3615,30 @@ static unsigned long __init hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
> }
>
> job.max_threads = hugepage_allocation_threads;
> - job.min_chunk = h->max_huge_pages / hugepage_allocation_threads;
>
> jiffies_start = jiffies;
> - padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
> + do {
> + remaining = h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages;
> +
> + job.start = h->nr_huge_pages;
> + job.size = remaining;
> + job.min_chunk = remaining / hugepage_allocation_threads;
> + padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
> +
> + if (h->nr_huge_pages == h->max_huge_pages)
> + break;
> +
> + /*
> + * Retry allocation if vmemmap optimization is available, the
> + * optimization frees ~1.6% of memory of hugepages, this reclaimed
> + * memory enables additional hugepage allocations
As I said, please remove any calculation details about the vmemmap.
That's not the place to have such calculations easily become stale.
Something like the following:
/*
* Retry only if the vmemmap optimization might have been able to free
* some memory back to the system.
*/
> + */
> + if (!hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable(h))
> + break;
> +
> + /* Continue if progress was made in last iteration */
Comment wrongly indented.
> + } while (remaining != (h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages));
Why would you want to retry if you allocated all pages (IOW the common
case)?
E.g.,
remaining == 1
h->max_huge_pages == 1
h->nr_huge_pages == 1
while (1 != 1 -1) -> while (1 != 0)
you should probably do
do {
...
/* Stop if there is no progress */
if (remaining == h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages)
break;
} (h->max_huge_pages != h->nr_huge_pages);
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][v3] mm/hugetlb: Retry to allocate for early boot hugepage allocation
2025-08-29 15:20 Li,Rongqing
@ 2025-08-29 19:20 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-08-29 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li,Rongqing, muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com
On 29.08.25 17:20, Li,Rongqing wrote:
>
>
>> On 29.08.25 11:52, lirongqing wrote:
>>> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>>
>>> In cloud environments with massive hugepage reservations (95%+ of
>>> system RAM), single-attempt allocation during early boot often fails
>>> due to memory pressure.
>>>
>>> Commit 91f386bf0772 ("hugetlb: batch freeing of vmemmap pages")
>>> intensified this by deferring page frees, increase peak memory usage during
>> allocation.
>>>
>>> Introduce a retry mechanism that leverages vmemmap optimization
>>> reclaim (~1.6% memory) when available. Upon initial allocation
>>> failure, the system retries until successful or no further progress is
>>> made, ensuring reliable hugepage allocation while preserving batched
>> vmemmap freeing benefits.
>>>
>>> Testing on a 256G machine allocating 252G of hugepages:
>>> Before: 128056/129024 hugepages allocated
>>> After: Successfully allocated all 129024 hugepages
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>> ---
>>> Diff with v2: auto retry mechanism
>>> Diff with v1: add log if two-phase hugepage allocation is triggered
>>> add the knod to control split ratio
>>>
>>> mm/hugetlb.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 753f99b..18e54ea 100644
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> @@ -3589,10 +3589,9 @@ static unsigned long __init
>>> hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
>>>
>>> unsigned long jiffies_start;
>>> unsigned long jiffies_end;
>>> + unsigned long remaining;
>>>
>>> job.thread_fn = hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot_node;
>>> - job.start = 0;
>>> - job.size = h->max_huge_pages;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * job.max_threads is 25% of the available cpu threads by default.
>>> @@ -3616,10 +3615,30 @@ static unsigned long __init
>> hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot(struct hstate *h)
>>> }
>>>
>>> job.max_threads = hugepage_allocation_threads;
>>> - job.min_chunk = h->max_huge_pages /
>> hugepage_allocation_threads;
>>>
>>> jiffies_start = jiffies;
>>> - padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
>>> + do {
>>> + remaining = h->max_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages;
>>> +
>>> + job.start = h->nr_huge_pages;
>>> + job.size = remaining;
>>> + job.min_chunk = remaining / hugepage_allocation_threads;
>>> + padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
>>> +
>>> + if (h->nr_huge_pages == h->max_huge_pages)
>>> + break;
>
> If all pages are allocated, it will break out from here. Since in most cases the first allocation is successful, I have moved this check to the very beginning.
Missed that, thanks!
>
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Retry allocation if vmemmap optimization is available, the
>>> + * optimization frees ~1.6% of memory of hugepages, this reclaimed
>>> + * memory enables additional hugepage allocations
>>
>> As I said, please remove any calculation details about the vmemmap.
>> That's not the place to have such calculations easily become stale.
>>
>> Something like the following:
>>
>> /*
>> * Retry only if the vmemmap optimization might have been able to free
>> * some memory back to the system.
>> */
>>
>
> Thanks, I will fix it
>
>>> + */
>>> + if (!hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable(h))
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + /* Continue if progress was made in last iteration */
>>
>> Comment wrongly indented.
>>
Maybe just comment above the loop that we retry as long as we are making
progress instead. It's unusual to see these tail comments in loops.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-29 19:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-29 9:52 [PATCH][v3] mm/hugetlb: Retry to allocate for early boot hugepage allocation lirongqing
2025-08-29 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-29 15:20 Li,Rongqing
2025-08-29 19:20 ` David Hildenbrand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).