* [PATCH v20 1/8] arm64/gcs: Return a success value from gcs_alloc_thread_stack()
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 2/8] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation Mark Brown
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook
Currently as a result of templating from x86 code gcs_alloc_thread_stack()
returns a pointer as an unsigned int however on arm64 we don't actually use
this pointer value as anything other than a pass/fail flag. Simplify the
interface to just return an int with 0 on success and a negative error code
on failure.
Acked-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h | 8 ++++----
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 8 ++++----
arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h
index 5bc432234d3a..b4bbec9382a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static inline bool task_gcs_el0_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
void gcs_set_el0_mode(struct task_struct *task);
void gcs_free(struct task_struct *task);
void gcs_preserve_current_state(void);
-unsigned long gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
- const struct kernel_clone_args *args);
+int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args);
static inline int gcs_check_locked(struct task_struct *task,
unsigned long new_val)
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static inline bool task_gcs_el0_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
static inline void gcs_set_el0_mode(struct task_struct *task) { }
static inline void gcs_free(struct task_struct *task) { }
static inline void gcs_preserve_current_state(void) { }
-static inline unsigned long gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
- const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+static inline int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
{
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 96482a1412c6..f0b1bea9c873 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void flush_gcs(void)
static int copy_thread_gcs(struct task_struct *p,
const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
{
- unsigned long gcs;
+ int ret;
if (!system_supports_gcs())
return 0;
@@ -310,9 +310,9 @@ static int copy_thread_gcs(struct task_struct *p,
p->thread.gcs_el0_mode = current->thread.gcs_el0_mode;
p->thread.gcs_el0_locked = current->thread.gcs_el0_locked;
- gcs = gcs_alloc_thread_stack(p, args);
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(gcs))
- return PTR_ERR((void *)gcs);
+ ret = gcs_alloc_thread_stack(p, args);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
index 6e93f78de79b..3abcbf9adb5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ static unsigned long gcs_size(unsigned long size)
return max(PAGE_SIZE, size);
}
-unsigned long gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
- const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
{
unsigned long addr, size;
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ unsigned long gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
size = gcs_size(size);
addr = alloc_gcs(0, size);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
- return addr;
+ return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
tsk->thread.gcs_base = addr;
tsk->thread.gcs_size = size;
tsk->thread.gcspr_el0 = addr + size - sizeof(u64);
- return addr;
+ return 0;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 2/8] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 1/8] arm64/gcs: Return a success value from gcs_alloc_thread_stack() Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 3/8] selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing Mark Brown
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
There are a number of architectures with shadow stack features which we are
presenting to userspace with as consistent an API as we can (though there
are some architecture specifics). Especially given that there are some
important considerations for userspace code interacting directly with the
feature let's provide some documentation covering the common aspects.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
index b8c73be4fb11..0167e59b541e 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ Everything else
ELF
netlink/index
+ shadow_stack
sysfs-platform_profile
vduse
futex2
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..42617d0470ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=============
+Shadow Stacks
+=============
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Several architectures have features which provide backward edge
+control flow protection through a hardware maintained stack, only
+writable by userspace through very limited operations. This feature
+is referred to as shadow stacks on Linux, on x86 it is part of Intel
+Control Enforcement Technology (CET), on arm64 it is Guarded Control
+Stacks feature (FEAT_GCS) and for RISC-V it is the Zicfiss extension.
+It is expected that this feature will normally be managed by the
+system dynamic linker and libc in ways broadly transparent to
+application code, this document covers interfaces and considerations.
+
+
+Enabling
+========
+
+Shadow stacks default to disabled when a userspace process is
+executed, they can be enabled for the current thread with a syscall:
+
+ - For x86 the ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE arch_prctl()
+ - For other architectures the PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE prctl()
+
+It is expected that this will normally be done by the dynamic linker.
+Any new threads created by a thread with shadow stacks enabled will
+themselves have shadow stacks enabled.
+
+
+Enablement considerations
+=========================
+
+- Returning from the function that enables shadow stacks without first
+ disabling them will cause a shadow stack exception. This includes
+ any syscall wrapper or other library functions, the syscall will need
+ to be inlined.
+- A lock feature allows userspace to prevent disabling of shadow stacks.
+- Those that change the stack context like longjmp() or use of ucontext
+ changes on signal return will need support from libc.
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 3/8] selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 1/8] arm64/gcs: Return a success value from gcs_alloc_thread_stack() Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 2/8] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
While almost all users of shadow stacks should be relying on the dynamic
linker and libc to enable the feature there are several low level test
programs where it is useful to enable without any libc support, allowing
testing without full system enablement. This low level testing is helpful
during bringup of the support itself, and also in enabling coverage by
automated testing without needing all system components in the target root
filesystems to have enablement.
Provide a header with helpers for this purpose, intended for use only by
test programs directly exercising shadow stack interfaces.
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/ksft_shstk.h | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ksft_shstk.h b/tools/testing/selftests/ksft_shstk.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fecf91218ea5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ksft_shstk.h
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Helpers for shadow stack enablement, this is intended to only be
+ * used by low level test programs directly exercising interfaces for
+ * working with shadow stacks.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 ARM Ltd.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __KSFT_SHSTK_H
+#define __KSFT_SHSTK_H
+
+#include <asm/mman.h>
+
+/* This is currently only defined for x86 */
+#ifndef SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN
+#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN (1ULL << 0)
+#endif
+
+static bool shadow_stack_enabled;
+
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+#define ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE 0x5001
+#define ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK (1ULL << 0)
+
+#define ARCH_PRCTL(arg1, arg2) \
+({ \
+ long _ret; \
+ register long _num asm("eax") = __NR_arch_prctl; \
+ register long _arg1 asm("rdi") = (long)(arg1); \
+ register long _arg2 asm("rsi") = (long)(arg2); \
+ \
+ asm volatile ( \
+ "syscall\n" \
+ : "=a"(_ret) \
+ : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2), \
+ "0"(_num) \
+ : "rcx", "r11", "memory", "cc" \
+ ); \
+ _ret; \
+})
+
+#define ENABLE_SHADOW_STACK
+static __always_inline void enable_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ int ret = ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ shadow_stack_enabled = true;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __aarch64__
+#define PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS 75
+# define PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE (1UL << 0)
+
+#define my_syscall2(num, arg1, arg2) \
+({ \
+ register long _num __asm__ ("x8") = (num); \
+ register long _arg1 __asm__ ("x0") = (long)(arg1); \
+ register long _arg2 __asm__ ("x1") = (long)(arg2); \
+ register long _arg3 __asm__ ("x2") = 0; \
+ register long _arg4 __asm__ ("x3") = 0; \
+ register long _arg5 __asm__ ("x4") = 0; \
+ \
+ __asm__ volatile ( \
+ "svc #0\n" \
+ : "=r"(_arg1) \
+ : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2), \
+ "r"(_arg3), "r"(_arg4), \
+ "r"(_arg5), "r"(_num) \
+ : "memory", "cc" \
+ ); \
+ _arg1; \
+})
+
+#define ENABLE_SHADOW_STACK
+static __always_inline void enable_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ shadow_stack_enabled = true;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#ifndef __NR_map_shadow_stack
+#define __NR_map_shadow_stack 453
+#endif
+
+#ifndef ENABLE_SHADOW_STACK
+static inline void enable_shadow_stack(void) { }
+#endif
+
+#endif
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 3/8] selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 21:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-05 15:21 ` Christian Brauner
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 5/8] selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams Mark Brown
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook
Unlike with the normal stack there is no API for configuring the shadow
stack for a new thread, instead the kernel will dynamically allocate a
new shadow stack with the same size as the normal stack. This appears to
be due to the shadow stack series having been in development since
before the more extensible clone3() was added rather than anything more
deliberate.
Add a parameter to clone3() specifying a shadow stack pointer to use
for the new thread, this is inconsistent with the way we specify the
normal stack but during review concerns were expressed about having to
identify where the shadow stack pointer should be placed especially in
cases where the shadow stack has been previously active. If no shadow
stack is specified then the existing implicit allocation behaviour is
maintained.
If a shadow stack pointer is specified then it is required to have an
architecture defined token placed on the stack, this will be consumed by
the new task, the shadow stack is specified by pointing to this token. If
no valid token is present then this will be reported with -EINVAL. This
token prevents new threads being created pointing at the shadow stack of
an existing running thread. On architectures with support for userspace
pivoting of shadow stacks it is expected that the same format and placement
of tokens will be used, this is the case for arm64 and x86.
If the architecture does not support shadow stacks the shadow stack
pointer must be not be specified, architectures that do support the
feature are expected to enforce the same requirement on individual
systems that lack shadow stack support.
Update the existing arm64 and x86 implementations to pay attention to
the newly added arguments, in order to maintain compatibility we use the
existing behaviour if no shadow stack is specified. Since we are now
using more fields from the kernel_clone_args we pass that into the
shadow stack code rather than individual fields.
Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe.
Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
Tested-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h | 11 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++---
include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h | 11 +++++
include/linux/sched/task.h | 17 ++++++++
include/uapi/linux/sched.h | 9 ++--
kernel/fork.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
8 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
index 3abcbf9adb5c..249ff05bca45 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
@@ -43,8 +43,23 @@ int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
{
unsigned long addr, size;
- if (!system_supports_gcs())
+ if (!system_supports_gcs()) {
+ if (args->shadow_stack_token)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the user specified a GCS then use it, otherwise fall
+ * back to a default allocation strategy. Validation is done
+ * in arch_shstk_validate_clone().
+ */
+ if (args->shadow_stack_token) {
+ tsk->thread.gcs_base = 0;
+ tsk->thread.gcs_size = 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
if (!task_gcs_el0_enabled(tsk))
return 0;
@@ -68,6 +83,36 @@ int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
return 0;
}
+static bool gcs_consume_token(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
+ unsigned long user_addr)
+{
+ u64 expected = GCS_CAP(user_addr);
+ u64 *token = page_address(page) + offset_in_page(user_addr);
+
+ if (!cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, user_addr, token, expected, 0))
+ return false;
+ set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct page *page,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+{
+ unsigned long gcspr_el0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ gcspr_el0 = args->shadow_stack_token;
+ if (!gcs_consume_token(vma, page, gcspr_el0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ tsk->thread.gcspr_el0 = gcspr_el0 + sizeof(u64);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
{
unsigned long alloc_size;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
index ba6f2fe43848..827e983430aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
struct task_struct;
+struct kernel_clone_args;
struct ksignal;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK
@@ -16,8 +17,8 @@ struct thread_shstk {
long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long arg2);
void reset_thread_features(void);
-unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags,
- unsigned long stack_size);
+unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p,
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args);
void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p);
int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig);
int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void);
@@ -28,8 +29,10 @@ static inline long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option,
unsigned long arg2) { return -EINVAL; }
static inline void reset_thread_features(void) {}
static inline unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p,
- unsigned long clone_flags,
- unsigned long stack_size) { return 0; }
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
static inline int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig) { return 0; }
static inline int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void) { return 0; }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 1b7960cf6eb0..0a54af6c60df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
* is disabled, new_ssp will remain 0, and fpu_clone() will know not to
* update it.
*/
- new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, clone_flags, args->stack_size);
+ new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, args);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_ssp))
return PTR_ERR((void *)new_ssp);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
index 2ddf23387c7e..9926d58e5d41 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
@@ -191,18 +191,61 @@ void reset_thread_features(void)
current->thread.features_locked = 0;
}
-unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long clone_flags,
- unsigned long stack_size)
+int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *t,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct page *page,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+{
+ void *maddr = page_address(page);
+ unsigned long token;
+ int offset;
+ u64 expected;
+
+ /*
+ * kernel_clone_args() verification assures token address is 8
+ * byte aligned.
+ */
+ token = args->shadow_stack_token;
+ expected = (token + SS_FRAME_SIZE) | BIT(0);
+ offset = offset_in_page(token);
+
+ if (!cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, token, (unsigned long *)(maddr + offset),
+ expected, 0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
{
struct thread_shstk *shstk = &tsk->thread.shstk;
+ unsigned long clone_flags = args->flags;
unsigned long addr, size;
/*
* If shadow stack is not enabled on the new thread, skip any
- * switch to a new shadow stack.
+ * implicit switch to a new shadow stack and reject attempts to
+ * explicitly specify one.
*/
- if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK))
+ if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
+ if (args->shadow_stack_token)
+ return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the user specified a shadow stack then use it, otherwise
+ * fall back to a default allocation strategy. Validation is
+ * done in arch_shstk_validate_clone().
+ */
+ if (args->shadow_stack_token) {
+ shstk->base = 0;
+ shstk->size = 0;
+ return args->shadow_stack_token + 8;
+ }
/*
* For CLONE_VFORK the child will share the parents shadow stack.
@@ -222,7 +265,7 @@ unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long cl
if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM))
return 0;
- size = adjust_shstk_size(stack_size);
+ size = adjust_shstk_size(args->stack_size);
addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
return addr;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h b/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
index 7ee8a179d103..96cc0c7a5c90 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
@@ -124,4 +124,15 @@ static inline void flush_cache_vunmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
} while (0)
#endif
+#ifndef cmpxchg_to_user_page
+#define cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, vaddr, ptr, old, new) \
+({ \
+ bool ret; \
+ \
+ ret = try_cmpxchg(ptr, &old, new); \
+ flush_icache_user_page(vma, page, vaddr, sizeof(*ptr)); \
+ ret; \
+})
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_CACHEFLUSH_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
index ea41795a352b..b501f752fc9a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct task_struct;
struct rusage;
union thread_union;
struct css_set;
+struct vm_area_struct;
/* All the bits taken by the old clone syscall. */
#define CLONE_LEGACY_FLAGS 0xffffffffULL
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ struct kernel_clone_args {
struct cgroup *cgrp;
struct css_set *cset;
unsigned int kill_seq;
+ unsigned long shadow_stack_token;
};
/*
@@ -226,4 +228,19 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
DEFINE_GUARD(task_lock, struct task_struct *, task_lock(_T), task_unlock(_T))
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
+int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct page *page,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *args);
+#else
+static inline int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct page *page,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_TASK_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
index 359a14cc76a4..9cf5c419e109 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
* kernel's limit of nested PID namespaces.
* @cgroup: If CLONE_INTO_CGROUP is specified set this to
* a file descriptor for the cgroup.
+ * @shadow_stack_token: Pointer to shadow stack token at top of stack.
*
* The structure is versioned by size and thus extensible.
* New struct members must go at the end of the struct and
@@ -101,12 +102,14 @@ struct clone_args {
__aligned_u64 set_tid;
__aligned_u64 set_tid_size;
__aligned_u64 cgroup;
+ __aligned_u64 shadow_stack_token;
};
#endif
-#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER0 64 /* sizeof first published struct */
-#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1 80 /* sizeof second published struct */
-#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2 88 /* sizeof third published struct */
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER0 64 /* sizeof first published struct */
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1 80 /* sizeof second published struct */
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2 88 /* sizeof third published struct */
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3 96 /* sizeof fourth published struct */
/*
* Scheduling policies
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index af673856499d..d484ebeded33 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1907,6 +1907,51 @@ static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
return true;
}
+static int shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *args)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned long addr;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!args->shadow_stack_token)
+ return 0;
+
+ mm = get_task_mm(p);
+ if (!mm)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ mmap_read_lock(mm);
+
+ addr = untagged_addr_remote(mm, args->shadow_stack_token);
+ page = get_user_page_vma_remote(mm, addr, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE,
+ &vma);
+ if (IS_ERR(page)) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK) ||
+ !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out_page;
+ }
+
+ ret = arch_shstk_validate_clone(p, vma, page, args);
+
+out_page:
+ put_page(page);
+out:
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+ mmput(mm);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* This creates a new process as a copy of the old one,
* but does not actually start it yet.
@@ -2182,6 +2227,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
if (retval)
goto bad_fork_cleanup_namespaces;
retval = copy_thread(p, args);
+ if (retval)
+ goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
+ retval = shstk_validate_clone(p, args);
if (retval)
goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
@@ -2763,7 +2811,9 @@ static noinline int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1);
BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetofend(struct clone_args, cgroup) !=
CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct clone_args) != CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetofend(struct clone_args, shadow_stack_token) !=
+ CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct clone_args) != CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3);
if (unlikely(usize > PAGE_SIZE))
return -E2BIG;
@@ -2796,16 +2846,17 @@ static noinline int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
return -EINVAL;
*kargs = (struct kernel_clone_args){
- .flags = args.flags,
- .pidfd = u64_to_user_ptr(args.pidfd),
- .child_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.child_tid),
- .parent_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.parent_tid),
- .exit_signal = args.exit_signal,
- .stack = args.stack,
- .stack_size = args.stack_size,
- .tls = args.tls,
- .set_tid_size = args.set_tid_size,
- .cgroup = args.cgroup,
+ .flags = args.flags,
+ .pidfd = u64_to_user_ptr(args.pidfd),
+ .child_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.child_tid),
+ .parent_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.parent_tid),
+ .exit_signal = args.exit_signal,
+ .stack = args.stack,
+ .stack_size = args.stack_size,
+ .tls = args.tls,
+ .set_tid_size = args.set_tid_size,
+ .cgroup = args.cgroup,
+ .shadow_stack_token = args.shadow_stack_token,
};
if (args.set_tid &&
@@ -2846,6 +2897,24 @@ static inline bool clone3_stack_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
return true;
}
+/**
+ * clone3_shadow_stack_valid - check and prepare shadow stack
+ * @kargs: kernel clone args
+ *
+ * Verify that shadow stacks are only enabled if supported.
+ */
+static inline bool clone3_shadow_stack_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
+{
+ if (!kargs->shadow_stack_token)
+ return true;
+
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(kargs->shadow_stack_token, sizeof(void *)))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Fail if the kernel wasn't built with shadow stacks */
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK);
+}
+
static bool clone3_args_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
{
/* Verify that no unknown flags are passed along. */
@@ -2868,7 +2937,7 @@ static bool clone3_args_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
kargs->exit_signal)
return false;
- if (!clone3_stack_valid(kargs))
+ if (!clone3_stack_valid(kargs) || !clone3_shadow_stack_valid(kargs))
return false;
return true;
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 21:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-03 10:01 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-05 15:21 ` Christian Brauner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2025-09-02 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan,
linux-kernel, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev,
Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api, Kees Cook
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index af673856499d..d484ebeded33 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,51 @@ static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!args->shadow_stack_token)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mm = get_task_mm(p);
> + if (!mm)
> + return -EFAULT;
In theory, I don't think we need the get_task_mm() -> mmget() since
copy_mm() early on already did this and the task can't disappear from
underneath while we are creating it.
> +
> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +
> + addr = untagged_addr_remote(mm, args->shadow_stack_token);
> + page = get_user_page_vma_remote(mm, addr, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE,
> + &vma);
However, I wonder whether it makes sense to use the remote mm access
here at all. Does this code ever run without CLONE_VM? If not, this is
all done within the current mm context.
I can see the x86 shstk_alloc_thread_stack() returns early if !CLONE_VM.
Similarly on arm64. I think the behaviour is preserved with this series
but I'm not entirely sure from the contextual diff (I need to apply the
patches locally).
Otherwise the patch looks fine (well, even the above wouldn't fail, I
just find it strange that we pretend it's a remote mm but on the default
allocation path like alloc_gcs() we go for current->mm).
BTW, if you repost, it might be worth cross-posting to linux-arm-kernel
for wider exposure as not everyone reads LKML (and you can drop
Szabolcs, his arm address is no longer valid).
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-02 21:02 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-09-03 10:01 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-03 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-03 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan,
linux-kernel, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev,
Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api, Kees Cook
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1903 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:02:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > + mm = get_task_mm(p);
> > + if (!mm)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> In theory, I don't think we need the get_task_mm() -> mmget() since
> copy_mm() early on already did this and the task can't disappear from
> underneath while we are creating it.
mmget() will only have been done in the CLONE_VM case, if we're in the
!CLONE_VM case we do a dup_mm() but that also returns with a reference.
I didn't know if people would be happier with the reference clearly
taken by the code using things or not, the general pattern is that
whenever we're doing anything with remote VMs we take a reference.
> > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > +
> > + addr = untagged_addr_remote(mm, args->shadow_stack_token);
> > + page = get_user_page_vma_remote(mm, addr, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE,
> > + &vma);
> However, I wonder whether it makes sense to use the remote mm access
> here at all. Does this code ever run without CLONE_VM? If not, this is
> all done within the current mm context.
Yes, userspace can select if it wants CLONE_VM or not so we should
handle that case. We discussed this on prior versions and we felt that
while we couldn't immediately see the use case for !CLONE_VM there
wasn't a good reason to restrict the creativity of userspace developers,
and given that you can specify the regular stack in these cases it seems
logical that you'd also be able to specify the shadow stack.
> I can see the x86 shstk_alloc_thread_stack() returns early if !CLONE_VM.
> Similarly on arm64. I think the behaviour is preserved with this series
> but I'm not entirely sure from the contextual diff (I need to apply the
> patches locally).
That is all for the case where the kernel allocates and manages the
shadow stack, it's the behaviour that this series allows userspace to
override.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-03 10:01 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-03 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2025-09-03 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan,
linux-kernel, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev,
Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api, Kees Cook
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:01:05AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:02:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > > +
> > > + addr = untagged_addr_remote(mm, args->shadow_stack_token);
> > > + page = get_user_page_vma_remote(mm, addr, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE,
> > > + &vma);
>
> > However, I wonder whether it makes sense to use the remote mm access
> > here at all. Does this code ever run without CLONE_VM? If not, this is
> > all done within the current mm context.
>
> Yes, userspace can select if it wants CLONE_VM or not so we should
> handle that case. We discussed this on prior versions and we felt that
> while we couldn't immediately see the use case for !CLONE_VM there
> wasn't a good reason to restrict the creativity of userspace developers,
> and given that you can specify the regular stack in these cases it seems
> logical that you'd also be able to specify the shadow stack.
Yeah. Not sure it makes much sense in practice but if we allow a new
stack without CLONE_VM, we should also allow a shadow stack. Thanks for
the clarification.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
2025-09-02 21:02 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-09-05 15:21 ` Christian Brauner
2025-09-05 15:43 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2025-09-05 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Shuah Khan, linux-kernel,
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton,
Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api,
Kees Cook
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Unlike with the normal stack there is no API for configuring the shadow
> stack for a new thread, instead the kernel will dynamically allocate a
> new shadow stack with the same size as the normal stack. This appears to
> be due to the shadow stack series having been in development since
> before the more extensible clone3() was added rather than anything more
> deliberate.
>
> Add a parameter to clone3() specifying a shadow stack pointer to use
> for the new thread, this is inconsistent with the way we specify the
> normal stack but during review concerns were expressed about having to
> identify where the shadow stack pointer should be placed especially in
> cases where the shadow stack has been previously active. If no shadow
> stack is specified then the existing implicit allocation behaviour is
> maintained.
>
> If a shadow stack pointer is specified then it is required to have an
> architecture defined token placed on the stack, this will be consumed by
> the new task, the shadow stack is specified by pointing to this token. If
> no valid token is present then this will be reported with -EINVAL. This
> token prevents new threads being created pointing at the shadow stack of
> an existing running thread. On architectures with support for userspace
> pivoting of shadow stacks it is expected that the same format and placement
> of tokens will be used, this is the case for arm64 and x86.
>
> If the architecture does not support shadow stacks the shadow stack
> pointer must be not be specified, architectures that do support the
> feature are expected to enforce the same requirement on individual
> systems that lack shadow stack support.
>
> Update the existing arm64 and x86 implementations to pay attention to
> the newly added arguments, in order to maintain compatibility we use the
> existing behaviour if no shadow stack is specified. Since we are now
> using more fields from the kernel_clone_args we pass that into the
> shadow stack code rather than individual fields.
>
> Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe.
>
> Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h | 11 +++--
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h | 11 +++++
> include/linux/sched/task.h | 17 ++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/sched.h | 9 ++--
> kernel/fork.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 8 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
> index 3abcbf9adb5c..249ff05bca45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,23 @@ int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
> {
> unsigned long addr, size;
>
> - if (!system_supports_gcs())
> + if (!system_supports_gcs()) {
> + if (args->shadow_stack_token)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the user specified a GCS then use it, otherwise fall
> + * back to a default allocation strategy. Validation is done
> + * in arch_shstk_validate_clone().
> + */
> + if (args->shadow_stack_token) {
> + tsk->thread.gcs_base = 0;
> + tsk->thread.gcs_size = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> if (!task_gcs_el0_enabled(tsk))
> return 0;
> @@ -68,6 +83,36 @@ int gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool gcs_consume_token(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> + unsigned long user_addr)
> +{
> + u64 expected = GCS_CAP(user_addr);
> + u64 *token = page_address(page) + offset_in_page(user_addr);
> +
> + if (!cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, user_addr, token, expected, 0))
> + return false;
> + set_page_dirty_lock(page);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct page *page,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + unsigned long gcspr_el0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + gcspr_el0 = args->shadow_stack_token;
> + if (!gcs_consume_token(vma, page, gcspr_el0))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + tsk->thread.gcspr_el0 = gcspr_el0 + sizeof(u64);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
> {
> unsigned long alloc_size;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
> index ba6f2fe43848..827e983430aa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> struct task_struct;
> +struct kernel_clone_args;
> struct ksignal;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> @@ -16,8 +17,8 @@ struct thread_shstk {
>
> long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long arg2);
> void reset_thread_features(void);
> -unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags,
> - unsigned long stack_size);
> +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p,
> + const struct kernel_clone_args *args);
> void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p);
> int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig);
> int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void);
> @@ -28,8 +29,10 @@ static inline long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option,
> unsigned long arg2) { return -EINVAL; }
> static inline void reset_thread_features(void) {}
> static inline unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p,
> - unsigned long clone_flags,
> - unsigned long stack_size) { return 0; }
> + const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> static inline void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
> static inline int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksignal *ksig) { return 0; }
> static inline int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void) { return 0; }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 1b7960cf6eb0..0a54af6c60df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> * is disabled, new_ssp will remain 0, and fpu_clone() will know not to
> * update it.
> */
> - new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, clone_flags, args->stack_size);
> + new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, args);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_ssp))
> return PTR_ERR((void *)new_ssp);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> index 2ddf23387c7e..9926d58e5d41 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> @@ -191,18 +191,61 @@ void reset_thread_features(void)
> current->thread.features_locked = 0;
> }
>
> -unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long clone_flags,
> - unsigned long stack_size)
> +int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *t,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct page *page,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + void *maddr = page_address(page);
> + unsigned long token;
> + int offset;
> + u64 expected;
> +
> + /*
> + * kernel_clone_args() verification assures token address is 8
> + * byte aligned.
> + */
> + token = args->shadow_stack_token;
> + expected = (token + SS_FRAME_SIZE) | BIT(0);
> + offset = offset_in_page(token);
> +
> + if (!cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, token, (unsigned long *)(maddr + offset),
> + expected, 0))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + set_page_dirty_lock(page);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> {
> struct thread_shstk *shstk = &tsk->thread.shstk;
> + unsigned long clone_flags = args->flags;
> unsigned long addr, size;
>
> /*
> * If shadow stack is not enabled on the new thread, skip any
> - * switch to a new shadow stack.
> + * implicit switch to a new shadow stack and reject attempts to
> + * explicitly specify one.
> */
> - if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK))
> + if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
> + if (args->shadow_stack_token)
> + return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the user specified a shadow stack then use it, otherwise
> + * fall back to a default allocation strategy. Validation is
> + * done in arch_shstk_validate_clone().
> + */
> + if (args->shadow_stack_token) {
> + shstk->base = 0;
> + shstk->size = 0;
> + return args->shadow_stack_token + 8;
> + }
>
> /*
> * For CLONE_VFORK the child will share the parents shadow stack.
> @@ -222,7 +265,7 @@ unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long cl
> if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM))
> return 0;
>
> - size = adjust_shstk_size(stack_size);
> + size = adjust_shstk_size(args->stack_size);
> addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h b/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
> index 7ee8a179d103..96cc0c7a5c90 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h
> @@ -124,4 +124,15 @@ static inline void flush_cache_vunmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef cmpxchg_to_user_page
> +#define cmpxchg_to_user_page(vma, page, vaddr, ptr, old, new) \
> +({ \
> + bool ret; \
> + \
> + ret = try_cmpxchg(ptr, &old, new); \
> + flush_icache_user_page(vma, page, vaddr, sizeof(*ptr)); \
> + ret; \
> +})
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_CACHEFLUSH_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
> index ea41795a352b..b501f752fc9a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct task_struct;
> struct rusage;
> union thread_union;
> struct css_set;
> +struct vm_area_struct;
>
> /* All the bits taken by the old clone syscall. */
> #define CLONE_LEGACY_FLAGS 0xffffffffULL
> @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ struct kernel_clone_args {
> struct cgroup *cgrp;
> struct css_set *cset;
> unsigned int kill_seq;
> + unsigned long shadow_stack_token;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -226,4 +228,19 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
>
> DEFINE_GUARD(task_lock, struct task_struct *, task_lock(_T), task_unlock(_T))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> +int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct page *page,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args);
> +#else
> +static inline int arch_shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct page *page,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_TASK_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> index 359a14cc76a4..9cf5c419e109 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
> * kernel's limit of nested PID namespaces.
> * @cgroup: If CLONE_INTO_CGROUP is specified set this to
> * a file descriptor for the cgroup.
> + * @shadow_stack_token: Pointer to shadow stack token at top of stack.
> *
> * The structure is versioned by size and thus extensible.
> * New struct members must go at the end of the struct and
> @@ -101,12 +102,14 @@ struct clone_args {
> __aligned_u64 set_tid;
> __aligned_u64 set_tid_size;
> __aligned_u64 cgroup;
> + __aligned_u64 shadow_stack_token;
> };
> #endif
>
> -#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER0 64 /* sizeof first published struct */
> -#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1 80 /* sizeof second published struct */
> -#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2 88 /* sizeof third published struct */
> +#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER0 64 /* sizeof first published struct */
> +#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1 80 /* sizeof second published struct */
> +#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2 88 /* sizeof third published struct */
> +#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3 96 /* sizeof fourth published struct */
>
> /*
> * Scheduling policies
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index af673856499d..d484ebeded33 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,51 @@ static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int shstk_validate_clone(struct task_struct *p,
> + struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!args->shadow_stack_token)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mm = get_task_mm(p);
> + if (!mm)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +
> + addr = untagged_addr_remote(mm, args->shadow_stack_token);
> + page = get_user_page_vma_remote(mm, addr, FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE,
> + &vma);
> + if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK) ||
> + !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out_page;
> + }
> +
> + ret = arch_shstk_validate_clone(p, vma, page, args);
> +
> +out_page:
> + put_page(page);
> +out:
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + mmput(mm);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This creates a new process as a copy of the old one,
> * but does not actually start it yet.
> @@ -2182,6 +2227,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> if (retval)
> goto bad_fork_cleanup_namespaces;
> retval = copy_thread(p, args);
> + if (retval)
> + goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
> + retval = shstk_validate_clone(p, args);
> if (retval)
> goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
>
> @@ -2763,7 +2811,9 @@ static noinline int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
> CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER1);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetofend(struct clone_args, cgroup) !=
> CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2);
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct clone_args) != CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetofend(struct clone_args, shadow_stack_token) !=
> + CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct clone_args) != CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3);
>
> if (unlikely(usize > PAGE_SIZE))
> return -E2BIG;
> @@ -2796,16 +2846,17 @@ static noinline int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> *kargs = (struct kernel_clone_args){
> - .flags = args.flags,
> - .pidfd = u64_to_user_ptr(args.pidfd),
> - .child_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.child_tid),
> - .parent_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.parent_tid),
> - .exit_signal = args.exit_signal,
> - .stack = args.stack,
> - .stack_size = args.stack_size,
> - .tls = args.tls,
> - .set_tid_size = args.set_tid_size,
> - .cgroup = args.cgroup,
> + .flags = args.flags,
> + .pidfd = u64_to_user_ptr(args.pidfd),
> + .child_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.child_tid),
> + .parent_tid = u64_to_user_ptr(args.parent_tid),
> + .exit_signal = args.exit_signal,
> + .stack = args.stack,
> + .stack_size = args.stack_size,
> + .tls = args.tls,
> + .set_tid_size = args.set_tid_size,
> + .cgroup = args.cgroup,
> + .shadow_stack_token = args.shadow_stack_token,
I'm not sure why this has to be named "shadow_stack_token" I think
that's just confusing and we should just call it "shadow_stack" and be
done with it. It's also a bit long of a field name imho.
I have a kernel-6.18.clone3 branch
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=kernel-6.18.clone3
because there's another cross-arch cleanup that cleans up copy_thread(),
copy_sighand(), and copy_process() and - surprisingly - also adds
clone3() support for nios2...
Anyway, if you just want me to slap it on top of that branch then I can
simply rename while applying so no need to resend in that case.
> };
>
> if (args.set_tid &&
> @@ -2846,6 +2897,24 @@ static inline bool clone3_stack_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
> return true;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * clone3_shadow_stack_valid - check and prepare shadow stack
> + * @kargs: kernel clone args
> + *
> + * Verify that shadow stacks are only enabled if supported.
> + */
> +static inline bool clone3_shadow_stack_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
> +{
> + if (!kargs->shadow_stack_token)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(kargs->shadow_stack_token, sizeof(void *)))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Fail if the kernel wasn't built with shadow stacks */
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK);
> +}
> +
> static bool clone3_args_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
> {
> /* Verify that no unknown flags are passed along. */
> @@ -2868,7 +2937,7 @@ static bool clone3_args_valid(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
> kargs->exit_signal)
> return false;
>
> - if (!clone3_stack_valid(kargs))
> + if (!clone3_stack_valid(kargs) || !clone3_shadow_stack_valid(kargs))
> return false;
>
> return true;
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-05 15:21 ` Christian Brauner
@ 2025-09-05 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-05 15:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-09-05 16:00 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-05 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Shuah Khan, linux-kernel,
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton,
Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api,
Kees Cook
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > + .shadow_stack_token = args.shadow_stack_token,
> I'm not sure why this has to be named "shadow_stack_token" I think
> that's just confusing and we should just call it "shadow_stack" and be
> done with it. It's also a bit long of a field name imho.
I'm not hugely attached to the name, if you want to rename that's
perfectly fine by me. My thinking was that there's a potential
confusion with it being a pointer to the base of the shadow stack by
comparison with the existing "stack" but I do agree that the resulting
name is quite long and if someone does actually get confused they should
discover the problem fairly rapidly in testing. ss_token would shorter
but the abbreviation is less clear, whatever name you prefer is fine by
me.
> I have a kernel-6.18.clone3 branch
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=kernel-6.18.clone3
> because there's another cross-arch cleanup that cleans up copy_thread(),
> copy_sighand(), and copy_process() and - surprisingly - also adds
> clone3() support for nios2...
> Anyway, if you just want me to slap it on top of that branch then I can
> simply rename while applying so no need to resend in that case.
That would be amazing, I'm totally happy with you doing that. If I do
need to rebase and resend let me know.
It's probably worth mentioning that the RISC-V shadow stack support was
getting near to being merged, if that ends up being OK for this release
(it's not been posted yet though) there might be some cross tree merge
needed or something.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-05 15:43 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-05 15:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-09-05 16:00 ` Kees Cook
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Edgecombe, Rick P @ 2025-09-05 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, debug@rivosinc.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, kees@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, jannh@google.com,
yury.khrustalev@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, wilco.dijkstra@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 16:43 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > + .shadow_stack_token = args.shadow_stack_token,
>
> > I'm not sure why this has to be named "shadow_stack_token" I think
> > that's just confusing and we should just call it "shadow_stack" and be
> > done with it. It's also a bit long of a field name imho.
>
> I'm not hugely attached to the name, if you want to rename that's
> perfectly fine by me. My thinking was that there's a potential
> confusion with it being a pointer to the base of the shadow stack by
> comparison with the existing "stack" but I do agree that the resulting
> name is quite long and if someone does actually get confused they should
> discover the problem fairly rapidly in testing. ss_token would shorter
> but the abbreviation is less clear, whatever name you prefer is fine by
> me.
Yea the token point here is kind of important. That said, we could probably make
up for it with documentation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-05 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-05 15:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
@ 2025-09-05 16:00 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-05 16:02 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2025-09-05 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Christian Brauner, Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy,
H.J. Lu, Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt,
Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Shuah Khan,
linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton,
Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 04:43:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > + .shadow_stack_token = args.shadow_stack_token,
>
> > I'm not sure why this has to be named "shadow_stack_token" I think
> > that's just confusing and we should just call it "shadow_stack" and be
> > done with it. It's also a bit long of a field name imho.
>
> I'm not hugely attached to the name, if you want to rename that's
> perfectly fine by me. My thinking was that there's a potential
> confusion with it being a pointer to the base of the shadow stack by
> comparison with the existing "stack" but I do agree that the resulting
> name is quite long and if someone does actually get confused they should
> discover the problem fairly rapidly in testing. ss_token would shorter
> but the abbreviation is less clear, whatever name you prefer is fine by
> me.
Bike shed: shstk_token?
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
2025-09-05 16:00 ` Kees Cook
@ 2025-09-05 16:02 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-05 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook
Cc: Christian Brauner, Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy,
H.J. Lu, Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt,
Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Shuah Khan,
linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, Andrew Morton,
Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest, linux-api
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 09:00:51AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 04:43:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > discover the problem fairly rapidly in testing. ss_token would shorter
> > but the abbreviation is less clear, whatever name you prefer is fine by
> > me.
> Bike shed: shstk_token?
That also works and is fine by me, probably better than my idea.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v20 5/8] selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 6/8] selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3() Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
Since there were widespread issues with output not being flushed the
kselftest framework was modified to explicitly set the output streams
unbuffered in commit 58e2847ad2e6 ("selftests: line buffer test
program's stdout") so there is no need to explicitly flush in the clone3
tests.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
index eeca8005723f..939b26c86d42 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ struct __clone_args {
static pid_t sys_clone3(struct __clone_args *args, size_t size)
{
- fflush(stdout);
- fflush(stderr);
return syscall(__NR_clone3, args, size);
}
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 6/8] selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3()
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 5/8] selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 7/8] selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 8/8] selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support Mark Brown
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
In order to make it easier to add more configuration for the tests and
more support for runtime detection of when tests can be run pass the
structure describing the tests into test_clone3() rather than picking
the arguments out of it and have that function do all the per-test work.
No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index e61f07973ce5..e066b201fa64 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -30,6 +30,19 @@ enum test_mode {
CLONE3_ARGS_INVAL_EXIT_SIGNAL_NSIG,
};
+typedef bool (*filter_function)(void);
+typedef size_t (*size_function)(void);
+
+struct test {
+ const char *name;
+ uint64_t flags;
+ size_t size;
+ size_function size_function;
+ int expected;
+ enum test_mode test_mode;
+ filter_function filter;
+};
+
static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
{
struct __clone_args args = {
@@ -109,30 +122,40 @@ static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
return 0;
}
-static bool test_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, int expected,
- enum test_mode test_mode)
+static void test_clone3(const struct test *test)
{
+ size_t size;
int ret;
+ if (test->filter && test->filter()) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s\n", test->name);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (test->size_function)
+ size = test->size_function();
+ else
+ size = test->size;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("Running test '%s'\n", test->name);
+
ksft_print_msg(
"[%d] Trying clone3() with flags %#" PRIx64 " (size %zu)\n",
- getpid(), flags, size);
- ret = call_clone3(flags, size, test_mode);
+ getpid(), test->flags, size);
+ ret = call_clone3(test->flags, size, test->test_mode);
ksft_print_msg("[%d] clone3() with flags says: %d expected %d\n",
- getpid(), ret, expected);
- if (ret != expected) {
+ getpid(), ret, test->expected);
+ if (ret != test->expected) {
ksft_print_msg(
"[%d] Result (%d) is different than expected (%d)\n",
- getpid(), ret, expected);
- return false;
+ getpid(), ret, test->expected);
+ ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", test->name);
+ return;
}
- return true;
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", test->name);
}
-typedef bool (*filter_function)(void);
-typedef size_t (*size_function)(void);
-
static bool not_root(void)
{
if (getuid() != 0) {
@@ -160,16 +183,6 @@ static size_t page_size_plus_8(void)
return getpagesize() + 8;
}
-struct test {
- const char *name;
- uint64_t flags;
- size_t size;
- size_function size_function;
- int expected;
- enum test_mode test_mode;
- filter_function filter;
-};
-
static const struct test tests[] = {
{
.name = "simple clone3()",
@@ -319,24 +332,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(tests));
test_clone3_supported();
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
- if (tests[i].filter && tests[i].filter()) {
- ksft_test_result_skip("%s\n", tests[i].name);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (tests[i].size_function)
- size = tests[i].size_function();
- else
- size = tests[i].size;
-
- ksft_print_msg("Running test '%s'\n", tests[i].name);
-
- ksft_test_result(test_clone3(tests[i].flags, size,
- tests[i].expected,
- tests[i].test_mode),
- "%s\n", tests[i].name);
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++)
+ test_clone3(&tests[i]);
ksft_finished();
}
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 7/8] selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 6/8] selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3() Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 8/8] selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support Mark Brown
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
The clone_args structure is extensible, with the syscall passing in the
length of the structure. Inside the kernel we use copy_struct_from_user()
to read the struct but this has the unfortunate side effect of silently
accepting some overrun in the structure size providing the extra data is
all zeros. This means that we can't discover the clone3() features that
the running kernel supports by simply probing with various struct sizes.
We need to check this for the benefit of test systems which run newer
kselftests on old kernels.
Add a flag which can be set on a test to indicate that clone3() may return
-E2BIG due to the use of newer struct versions. Currently no tests need
this but it will become an issue for testing clone3() support for shadow
stacks, the support for shadow stacks is already present on x86.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index e066b201fa64..5b8b7d640e70 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct test {
size_t size;
size_function size_function;
int expected;
+ bool e2big_valid;
enum test_mode test_mode;
filter_function filter;
};
@@ -146,6 +147,11 @@ static void test_clone3(const struct test *test)
ksft_print_msg("[%d] clone3() with flags says: %d expected %d\n",
getpid(), ret, test->expected);
if (ret != test->expected) {
+ if (test->e2big_valid && ret == -E2BIG) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Test reported -E2BIG\n");
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s\n", test->name);
+ return;
+ }
ksft_print_msg(
"[%d] Result (%d) is different than expected (%d)\n",
getpid(), ret, test->expected);
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v20 8/8] selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support
2025-09-02 10:21 [PATCH v20 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-02 10:21 ` [PATCH v20 7/8] selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code Mark Brown
@ 2025-09-02 10:21 ` Mark Brown
7 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-09-02 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rick P. Edgecombe, Deepak Gupta, Szabolcs Nagy, H.J. Lu,
Florian Weimer, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, Christian Brauner, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, jannh, bsegall,
Andrew Morton, Yury Khrustalev, Wilco Dijkstra, linux-kselftest,
linux-api, Mark Brown, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan
Add basic test coverage for specifying the shadow stack for a newly
created thread via clone3(), including coverage of the newly extended
argument structure. We check that a user specified shadow stack can be
provided, and that invalid combinations of parameters are rejected.
In order to facilitate testing on systems without userspace shadow stack
support we manually enable shadow stacks on startup, this is architecture
specific due to the use of an arch_prctl() on x86. Due to interactions with
potential userspace locking of features we actually detect support for
shadow stacks on the running system by attempting to allocate a shadow
stack page during initialisation using map_shadow_stack(), warning if this
succeeds when the enable failed.
In order to allow testing of user configured shadow stacks on
architectures with that feature we need to ensure that we do not return
from the function where the clone3() syscall is called in the child
process, doing so would trigger a shadow stack underflow. To do this we
use inline assembly rather than the standard syscall wrapper to call
clone3(). In order to avoid surprises we also use a syscall rather than
the libc exit() function., this should be overly cautious.
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h | 63 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index 5b8b7d640e70..6fd2b3238e2c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
/* Based on Christian Brauner's clone3() example */
#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <asm/mman.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -11,6 +12,7 @@
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/un.h>
@@ -19,8 +21,12 @@
#include <sched.h>
#include "../kselftest.h"
+#include "../ksft_shstk.h"
#include "clone3_selftests.h"
+static bool shadow_stack_supported;
+static size_t max_supported_args_size;
+
enum test_mode {
CLONE3_ARGS_NO_TEST,
CLONE3_ARGS_ALL_0,
@@ -28,6 +34,10 @@ enum test_mode {
CLONE3_ARGS_INVAL_EXIT_SIGNAL_NEG,
CLONE3_ARGS_INVAL_EXIT_SIGNAL_CSIG,
CLONE3_ARGS_INVAL_EXIT_SIGNAL_NSIG,
+ CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK,
+ CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_MISALIGNED,
+ CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NO_TOKEN,
+ CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NORMAL_MEMORY,
};
typedef bool (*filter_function)(void);
@@ -44,6 +54,44 @@ struct test {
filter_function filter;
};
+
+/*
+ * We check for shadow stack support by attempting to use
+ * map_shadow_stack() since features may have been locked by the
+ * dynamic linker resulting in spurious errors when we attempt to
+ * enable on startup. We warn if the enable failed.
+ */
+static void test_shadow_stack_supported(void)
+{
+ long ret;
+
+ ret = syscall(__NR_map_shadow_stack, 0, getpagesize(), 0);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ ksft_print_msg("map_shadow_stack() not supported\n");
+ } else if ((void *)ret == MAP_FAILED) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to map shadow stack\n");
+ } else {
+ ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack supportd\n");
+ shadow_stack_supported = true;
+
+ if (!shadow_stack_enabled)
+ ksft_print_msg("Mapped but did not enable shadow stack\n");
+ }
+}
+
+static void *get_shadow_stack_page(unsigned long flags)
+{
+ unsigned long long page;
+
+ page = syscall(__NR_map_shadow_stack, 0, getpagesize(), flags);
+ if ((void *)page == MAP_FAILED) {
+ ksft_print_msg("map_shadow_stack() failed: %d\n", errno);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return (void *)page;
+}
+
static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
{
struct __clone_args args = {
@@ -57,6 +105,7 @@ static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
} args_ext;
pid_t pid = -1;
+ void *p;
int status;
memset(&args_ext, 0, sizeof(args_ext));
@@ -89,6 +138,26 @@ static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
case CLONE3_ARGS_INVAL_EXIT_SIGNAL_NSIG:
args.exit_signal = 0x00000000000000f0ULL;
break;
+ case CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK:
+ p = get_shadow_stack_page(SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN);
+ p += getpagesize() - sizeof(void *);
+ args.shadow_stack_token = (unsigned long long)p;
+ break;
+ case CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_MISALIGNED:
+ p = get_shadow_stack_page(SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN);
+ p += getpagesize() - sizeof(void *) - 1;
+ args.shadow_stack_token = (unsigned long long)p;
+ break;
+ case CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NORMAL_MEMORY:
+ p = malloc(getpagesize());
+ p += getpagesize() - sizeof(void *);
+ args.shadow_stack_token = (unsigned long long)p;
+ break;
+ case CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NO_TOKEN:
+ p = get_shadow_stack_page(0);
+ p += getpagesize() - sizeof(void *);
+ args.shadow_stack_token = (unsigned long long)p;
+ break;
}
memcpy(&args_ext.args, &args, sizeof(struct __clone_args));
@@ -102,7 +171,12 @@ static int call_clone3(uint64_t flags, size_t size, enum test_mode test_mode)
if (pid == 0) {
ksft_print_msg("I am the child, my PID is %d\n", getpid());
- _exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+ /*
+ * Use a raw syscall to ensure we don't get issues
+ * with manually specified shadow stack and exit handlers.
+ */
+ syscall(__NR_exit, EXIT_SUCCESS);
+ ksft_print_msg("CHILD FAILED TO EXIT PID is %d\n", getpid());
}
ksft_print_msg("I am the parent (%d). My child's pid is %d\n",
@@ -184,6 +258,26 @@ static bool no_timenamespace(void)
return true;
}
+static bool have_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ if (shadow_stack_supported) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack supported\n");
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool no_shadow_stack(void)
+{
+ if (!shadow_stack_supported) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Shadow stack not supported\n");
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static size_t page_size_plus_8(void)
{
return getpagesize() + 8;
@@ -327,6 +421,50 @@ static const struct test tests[] = {
.expected = -EINVAL,
.test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_NO_TEST,
},
+ {
+ .name = "Shadow stack on system with shadow stack",
+ .size = 0,
+ .expected = 0,
+ .e2big_valid = true,
+ .test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK,
+ .filter = no_shadow_stack,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Shadow stack with misaligned address",
+ .flags = CLONE_VM,
+ .size = 0,
+ .expected = -EINVAL,
+ .e2big_valid = true,
+ .test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_MISALIGNED,
+ .filter = no_shadow_stack,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Shadow stack with normal memory",
+ .flags = CLONE_VM,
+ .size = 0,
+ .expected = -EFAULT,
+ .e2big_valid = true,
+ .test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NORMAL_MEMORY,
+ .filter = no_shadow_stack,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Shadow stack with no token",
+ .flags = CLONE_VM,
+ .size = 0,
+ .expected = -EINVAL,
+ .e2big_valid = true,
+ .test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NO_TOKEN,
+ .filter = no_shadow_stack,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Shadow stack on system without shadow stack",
+ .flags = CLONE_VM,
+ .size = 0,
+ .expected = -EFAULT,
+ .e2big_valid = true,
+ .test_mode = CLONE3_ARGS_SHADOW_STACK_NORMAL_MEMORY,
+ .filter = have_shadow_stack,
+ },
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
@@ -334,9 +472,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
size_t size;
int i;
+ enable_shadow_stack();
+
ksft_print_header();
ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(tests));
test_clone3_supported();
+ test_shadow_stack_supported();
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++)
test_clone3(&tests[i]);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
index 939b26c86d42..8151c4fc971a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h
@@ -31,12 +31,75 @@ struct __clone_args {
__aligned_u64 set_tid;
__aligned_u64 set_tid_size;
__aligned_u64 cgroup;
+#ifndef CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER2 88 /* sizeof third published struct */
+#endif
+ __aligned_u64 shadow_stack_token;
+#ifndef CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3
+#define CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER3 96 /* sizeof fourth published struct */
+#endif
};
+/*
+ * For architectures with shadow stack support we need to be
+ * absolutely sure that the clone3() syscall will be inline and not a
+ * function call so we open code.
+ */
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+static __always_inline pid_t sys_clone3(struct __clone_args *args, size_t size)
+{
+ register long _num __asm__ ("rax") = __NR_clone3;
+ register long _args __asm__ ("rdi") = (long)(args);
+ register long _size __asm__ ("rsi") = (long)(size);
+ long ret;
+
+ __asm__ volatile (
+ "syscall\n"
+ : "=a"(ret)
+ : "r"(_args), "r"(_size),
+ "0"(_num)
+ : "rcx", "r11", "memory", "cc"
+ );
+
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ errno = -ret;
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+#elif defined(__aarch64__)
+static __always_inline pid_t sys_clone3(struct __clone_args *args, size_t size)
+{
+ register long _num __asm__ ("x8") = __NR_clone3;
+ register long _args __asm__ ("x0") = (long)(args);
+ register long _size __asm__ ("x1") = (long)(size);
+ register long arg2 __asm__ ("x2") = 0;
+ register long arg3 __asm__ ("x3") = 0;
+ register long arg4 __asm__ ("x4") = 0;
+
+ __asm__ volatile (
+ "svc #0\n"
+ : "=r"(_args)
+ : "r"(_args), "r"(_size),
+ "r"(_num), "r"(arg2),
+ "r"(arg3), "r"(arg4)
+ : "memory", "cc"
+ );
+
+ if ((int)_args < 0) {
+ errno = -((int)_args);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return _args;
+}
+#else
static pid_t sys_clone3(struct __clone_args *args, size_t size)
{
return syscall(__NR_clone3, args, size);
}
+#endif
static inline void test_clone3_supported(void)
{
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread