From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m49197.qiye.163.com (mail-m49197.qiye.163.com [45.254.49.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 315D320B81B; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 07:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.254.49.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756796431; cv=none; b=MinZ0oVeqfkME2ooHfz0zCOmFx28ctLJ+zgHxWTJsMri2rj8Q1MkutHxqQsibEYfTIA56wqIhz1ykTDa3b1vVmrxNwwA8QGhp77agY2vgjbt5kdusou/3/EdSB1FaQH4H+emWUJpXes+dAXgSgoNCuS6QqCRRto1JBpoa9ZPw1w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756796431; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kn41AuD1tHC9cKxc8T65nTd7ets+m7wbkebswHfdUoQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=l7rvLRBwVNLaIoEFdoPNOvonk1GRF0Oq4mq+dxF14tnwRLeNkW5ftrhM/df+LBscSEc6RRIv/8XVPXdW4ugDe51atX8gaI5bdndbGuvoizMaHtD/MXlgY0HIuKg0Tnr2J25JNwdW3gNh7yzOn9g8fZ3YWmz9JyxJp0jZUZOxHyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=jmu.edu.cn; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jmu.edu.cn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.254.49.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=jmu.edu.cn Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jmu.edu.cn Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [119.122.212.9]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 2164fd079; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 15:00:22 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: Chukun Pan To: xunil@tahomasoft.com Cc: amadeus@jmu.edu.cn, andrew@lunn.ch, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HINLINK H68K Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 15:00:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20250902070019.856305-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20250901100639.234ba07b.xunil@tahomasoft.com> References: <20250901100639.234ba07b.xunil@tahomasoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a99093a0aff03a2kunm41dc6c2c7aad6 X-HM-MType: 10 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlCH08aVk5CHUwaSEJLHR1CS1YeHw5VEwETFhoSFy QUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlKSkJVSklJVUlKSVVCWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKS0lCTUtKVUpLS1VLWQ Y+ Hi, > So what I said earlier regarding rgmii vs rgmii-id DOES NOT hold up > under more rigorous and careful testing. So the following question does not exist? >> Changing this makes a huge difference in the ethernet throughput speed. With >> rgmii-id mode specified, throughput is about 6.5 Mbs. Changing this to rgmii >> mode increases throughput to about 960 Mbs. If the iperf3 test does not reach Gigabit, you can run it in multiple threads. e.g. `iperf3 -c xxx -P 4` -- 2.25.1